Abstract
Encoding action phrases by enactment (self-performed tasks, or SPTs) leads to better memory than does observing actions (experimenter-performed tasks, or EPTs) or hearing action phrases (Engelkamp, 1998). In addition, recognition memory for SPTs is enhanced when test items are reenacted. Experiment 1 demonstrated a reenactment effect for EPTs, as well as for SPTs, indicating that the effect can be based on visual, as well as motoric, feedback. However, the reenactment effect in SPTs was found even when the participants were blindfolded at test (Experiment 2), indicating that the basis for the reenactment effect differs across SPTs and EPTs. Experiments 3 and 4 provided additional evidence that visual feedback is not critical for reenactment recognition in the case of SPTs. In addition, these experiments failed to show a hand congruency effect (enhanced recognition when the same hand enacts at study and at test), indicating that this effect is not as generalizable as the reenactment effect. These results have important implications for the motor-encoding hypothesis of the enactment effect.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Backman, L., &Nilsson, L. G. (1985). Prerequisites for lack of age differences in memory performance.Experimental Aging Research,11, 67–73.
Backman, L., Nilsson, L. G., &Kormi-Nouri, R. (1993). Attentional demands and recall of verbal and color information in action events.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology,34, 246–254.
Cohen, J. (1988).Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Cohen, R. L. (1981). On the generality of some memory laws.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology,22, 267–281.
Cohen, R. L., Peterson, M., &Mantini-Atkinson, T. (1987). Interevent differences in event memory: Why are some events more recallable than others?Memory & Cognition,15, 109–118.
Engelkamp, J. (1998).Memory for actions. Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
Engelkamp, J. (2001a). Action memory: A systems-oriented approach. In H. D. Zimmer, R. L. Cohen, M. J. Guynn, J. Engelkamp, R. Kormi-Nouri, & M. A. Foley (Eds.),Memory for action: A distinct form of episodic memory? (pp. 49–96). New York: Oxford University Press.
Engelkamp, J. (2001b). What does it mean that the motor component is not crucial? Comments on Kormi-Nouri and Nilsson. In H. D. Zimmer, R. L. Cohen, M. J. Guynn, J. Engelkamp, R. Kormi-Nouri, & M. A. Foley (Eds.),Memory for action: A distinct form of episodic memory? (pp. 144–150). New York: Oxford University Press.
Engelkamp, J., &Zimmer, H. D. (1985). Motor programs and their relation to semantic memory.German Journal of Psychology,9, 239–254.
Engelkamp, J., &Zimmer, H. D. (1994). Motor similarity in subjectperformed tasks.Psychological Research,57, 47–53.
Engelkamp, J., &Zimmer, H. D. (1997). Sensory factors in memory for subject-performed tasks.Acta Psychologica,96, 43–60.
Engelkamp, J., Zimmer, H. D., &Biegelmann, U. E. (1993). Bizarreness effects in verbal tasks and subject-performed tasks.European Journal of Cognitive Psychology,5, 393–415.
Engelkamp, J., Zimmer, H. D., Mohr, G., &Sellen, O. (1994). Memory of self-performed tasks: Self-performing during recognition.Memory & Cognition,22, 34–39.
Helstrup, T. (1986). Separate memory laws for recall of performed acts?Scandinavian Journal of Psychology,27, 1–29.
Hornstein, S. L. (2001).Memory for action events: The effects of reenactment during retrieval and enactment on source discrimination. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Southern Methodist University.
Hornstein, S. L., &Mulligan, N. W. (2001). Memory for action events: The role of objects in memory of self- and other-performed tasks.American Journal of Psychology,114, 199–217.
Kormi-Nouri, R. (2000). The role of movement and object in action memory: A comparative study between blind, blindfolded and sighted subjects.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology,41, 71–75.
Kormi-Nouri, R., &Nilsson, L. G. (2001). The motor component is not crucial! In H. D. Zimmer, R. L. Cohen, M. J. Guynn, J. Engelkamp, R. Kormi-Nouri, & M. A. Foley (Eds.),Memory for action: A distinct form of episodic memory? (pp. 97–111). New York: Oxford University Press.
Kormi-Nouri, R., Nyberg, L., &Nilsson, L. G. (1994). The effect of retrieval enactment on recall of subject-performed tasks and verbal tasks.Memory & Cognition,22, 723–728.
Nilsson, L. G. (2000). Remembering actions and words. In F. I. M. Craik & E. Tulving (Eds.),Oxford handbook of memory (pp. 137–148). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nilsson, L. G., &Kormi-Nouri, R. (2001). What is the meaning of a memory-systems approach? Comments on Engelkamp. In H. D. Zimmer, R. L. Cohen, M. J. Guynn, J. Engelkamp, R. Kormi-Nouri, & M. A. Foley (Eds.),Memory for action: A distinct form of episodic memory? (pp. 136–143). New York: Oxford University Press.
Norris, M. P., &West, R. L. (1993). Activity memory and aging: The role of motor retrieval and strategic processing.Psychology & Aging,8, 81–86.
Roediger, H. L., III, &Guynn, M. J. (1996). Retrieval processes. In E. L. Bjork & R. A. Bjork (Eds.),Handbook of perception and cognition: Memory (2nd ed., pp. 197–236). San Diego: Academic Press.
Saltz, E., &Dixon, D. (1982). Let’s pretend: The role of motoric imagery in memory for sentences and words.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,34, 77–92.
Tulving, E., &Thomson, D. M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory.Psychological Review,80, 352–373.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This article is based in part on S.L.H.’s dissertation under the direction of N.W.M.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mulligan, N.W., Hornstein, S.L. Memory for actions: Self-performed tasks and the reenactment effect. Memory & Cognition 31, 412–421 (2003). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194399
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194399