Abstract
The influence of relevant semantic context on the incidental formation of episodic associations between words was probed in two experiments. In Experiment 1, we examined the influence of associations formed incidentally between unrelated words presented either in isolation or embedded in a sentential context on subsequent explicit paired-associate learning tested by cued recall. The results of Experiment 1 showed that the cued-recall rate of words studied in sentential context was higher than that of words co-occurring in isolated pairs. A subsequent single-items recognition test showed equal item memory for words studied in sentences than for words studied in isolated pairs, suggesting that the sentential context effect in cued recall indeed reflected stronger associations between paired words rather than better memory for single words. In Experiment 2, we ruled out memory for the entire sentence as an alternative explanation for the results of Experiment 1. We suggest two possible mechanisms to account for this advantage: First, pairs embedded in a sentence undergo semantic elaboration that might lead to the incidental formation of an association between them. Second, words embedded in a sentence enjoy the conjoint activation of compatible semantic features, a fact that may also facilitate the formation of an episodic association between them. The implications of these results for computational models using word representations based on co-occurrence data are discussed. This research was supported by German-Israeli Science Foundation Grant 567 and by a doctoral research stipend to A. P. from the Israeli Foundation Trustees.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Arnold, P. G., Bower, G. H., &Bobrow, S. A. (1972). Mediated semantic compatibility in associative learning.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,11, 239–242.
Balch, W. R., &Shapiro, S. I. (1971). Studies of paired-associate learning as a function of normative word-association strength.Psychological Reports,29, 187–190.
Barsalou, L. W. (1982). Context-independent and context-dependent information in concepts.Memory & Cognition,10, 82–93.
Bentin, S., Moscovitch, M., &Nirhod, O. (1998). Levels of processing and selective attention effects on encoding in memory.Acta Psychologica,98, 311–341.
Berry, F. M., &Cole, S. R. (1973). Stimulus selection in paired-associate learning: Consonant-triad versus word-triad paradigms.Journal of Experimental Psychology,97, 402–404.
Brown, A. S., &Mitchell, D. B. (1994). A reevaluation of semantic versus nonsemantic processing in implicit memory.Memory & Cognition,22, 533–541.
Burgess, C. (1998). From simple associations to the building blocks of language: Modeling meaning in memory with the HAL model.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,30, 188–198.
Challis, B. H., &Brodbeck, D. R. (1992). Level of processing affects priming in word fragment completion.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 595–607.
Chiarello, C., Burgess, C., Richards, L., &Pollock, A. (1990). Semantic and associative priming in the cerebral hemispheres: Some words do, some words don’t… sometimes, some places.Brain & Language,38, 75–104.
Craik, F. I.M. (1973). A “levels of analysis” view of memory. In P. Pliner, L. Krames, & T.M. Alloway (Eds.),Communication and affect: Language and thought (pp. 45–65). New York: Academic Press.
Craik, F. I. M., &Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,11, 671–684.
Craik, F. I. M., &Tulving, E. (1975). Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,104, 268–294.
Dagenbach, D., Horst, S., &Carr, T. H. (1990). Adding new information to semantic memory: How much learning is enough to produce automatic priming?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 581–591.
deGroot, A.M. B. (1990). The locus of the associative-priming effect in the mental lexicon. In D. A. Balota, G. B. Flores D’Arcais, & K. Rayner (Eds.),Comprehension processes in reading (pp. 101–123). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Durgunoglu, A. Y., &Neely, J. H. (1987). On obtaining episodic priming in a lexical decision task following paired associate learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,13, 206–222.
Epstein, W. (1969). Recall of word lists following learning of sentences and of anomalous and random strings.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavio,8, 20–25.
Eysenck, M. W. (1979). Depth, elaboration, and distinctiveness. In L. S. Cermak & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.),Levels of processing in human memory (pp. 89–118). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Goshen-Gottstein, Y., &Moscovitch, M. (1995a). Repetition priming for newly formed and preexisting associations: Perceptual and conceptual influences.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 1229–1248.
Goshen-Gottstein, Y., &Moscovitch, M. (1995b). Repetition priming effects for newly formed associations are perceptually based: Evidence from shallow encoding and format specif icity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 1249–1262.
Guttentag, R. (1995). Children’s associative learning: Automatic and deliberate encoding of meaningful associations.American Journal of Psychology,108, 99–114.
Hunt, R. R., &Einstein, G.O. (1981). Relational and item-specific information in memory.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,20, 497–514.
Hunt, R. R., &McDaniel, M. A. (1993). The enigma of organization and distinctiveness.Journal of Memory & Language,32, 421–445.
Jacoby, L. L., &Craik, F. I. M. (1979). Effects of elaboration of encoding and retrieval: Trace distinctiveness and recovery of initial context. In L. S. Cermak & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.),Levels of processing in human memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Johnson-Laird, P. N., Gibbs, G., &de Mowbray, J. (1978). Meaning, amount of processing, and memory for words.Memory & Cognition,6, 372–375.
Landauer, T.K., &Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato’s problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge.Psychological Review,104, 211–240.
Lund, K., &Burgess, C. (1996). Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical co-occurrence.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,28, 203–208.
Lund, K., Burgess, C., &Atchley, R. A. (1995). Semantic and associative priming in high-dimensional semantic space. InProceedings of the 17th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 660–665). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Lund, K., Burgess, C., &Audet, C. (1996). Dissociating semantic and associative word relationships using high-dimensional semantic space. InProceedings of the 18th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 603–608). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
McDonald, S., &Lowe, W. (1998). Modeling functional priming and the associative boost. InProceedings of the 20th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 675–680). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
McKoon, G., &Ratcliff, R. (1986). Automatic activation of episodic information in a semantic memory task.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,12, 108–115.
McRae, K., &Boisvert, S. (1998). Automatic semantic similarity priming.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24, 558–572.
Miller, G. A., &Charles, W. G. (1991). Contextual correlates of semantic similarity.Language & Cognitive Processes,6, 1–28.
Moscovitch, M., &Craik, F. I. M. (1976). Depth of processing, retrieval cues, and uniqueness of encoding as factors in recall.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,15, 447–458.
Moss, H.E., &Marslen-Wilson, W.D. (1993). Access to word meanings during spoken language comprehension: Effects of sentential semantic context.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 1254–1276.
Moss, H. E., Ostrin, R. K., Tyler, L. K., &Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1995). Accessing different types of lexical semantic information: Evidence from priming.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 863–883.
Nelson, D. L., McEvoy, C. L., &Dennis, S. (2000). What is free association and what does it measure?Memory & Cognition,28, 887–899.
Onifer, W., &Swinney, D. A. (1981). Accessing lexical ambiguities during sentence comprehension: Effects of frequency of meaning and contextual bias.Memory & Cognition,9, 225–236.
Plaut, D. C. (1995). Semantic and associative priming in a distributed attractor network. InProceedings of the 17th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 37–42). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Prior, A., & Bentin, S. (2003).Semantic factors in the incidental formation of new episodic associations. Unpublished manuscript.
Reingold, E. M., &Goshen-Gottstein, Y. (1996). Automatic retrieval of new associations under shallow encoding conditions.Consciousness & Cognition,5, 117–130.
Rimm, D. C., &Biggs, B. (1967). Acquisition of paired associates as a function of interpair interval.Psychonomic Science,9, 611–612.
Roediger, H. L., III, &McDermott, K. B. (1993). Implicit memory in normal human participants. In H. Spinnler & F. Boller (Eds.),Handbook of neuropsychology (Vol. 8, pp. 63–131). Amsterdam: Elsevier, North-Holland.
Schacter, D. L., &Graf, P. (1986). Effects of elaborative processing on implicit and explicit memory for new associations.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,12, 432–444.
Schacter, D. L., &McGlynn, S.M. (1989). Implicit memory: Effects of elaboration depend on unitization.American Journal of Psychology,102, 151–181.
Schrijnemakers, J. M. C., &Raaijmakers, J. G. W. (1997). Adding new word associations to semantic memory: Evidence for two interactive learning components.Acta Psychologica,96, 103–132.
Shelton, J. R., &Martin, R. C. (1992). How semantic is automatic priming?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 1191–1210.
Silberman, Y., Miikkulainen, R., &Bentin, S. (2001). Semantic effect on episodic associations. InProceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 934–939). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Smith, M.C., Theodor, L., &Franklin, P.E. (1983). The relationship between contextual facilitation and depth of processing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,9, 697–712.
Spence, D. P., &Owens, K. C. (1990). Lexical co-occurrence and association strength.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research,19, 317–330.
Stein, B. S., Littlefield, J., Bransford, J. D., &Persampieri, M. (1984). Elaboration and knowledge acquisition.Memory & Cognition,12, 522–529.
Swinney, D.A. (1979). Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,18, 645–659.
Tulving, E., &Pearlstone, Z. (1966). Availability versus accessibility of information in memory for words.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,5, 381–391.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Prior, A., Bentin, S. Incidental formation of episodic associations: The importance of sentential context. Memory & Cognition 31, 306–316 (2003). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194389
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194389