Abstract
According to spreading activation models of automatic priming, highly related associates should yield stronger priming effects than weakly related associates. The strength of relations is usually based on word association norms. However, this strength effect has been found in some studies but not in others. The present study suggests that one factor that might be responsible for this inconsistency is whether the weak associate is the primary or nonprimary response in the word association norms. This possibility was explored by comparing priming effects of weak nonprimary and primary associates with those of strong primary associates. Comparable priming effects were found for the strong and weak primary associates whereas the weak nonprimary associates did not yield any priming effects. These results were obtained both in paired (Experiment 1) and single (Experiment 2) presentation priming procedures. Thus, the rank of the associate is an important factor in predicting the magnitude of the priming effect.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Anderson, J. R. (1983).The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Becker, C. A. (1980). Semantic context effects in visual word recognition: An analysis of semantic strategies.Memory & Cognition,8, 493–512.
Burt, J. S., Walker, M. B., Humphreys, M. S., &Tehan, G. (1993). Associative priming in perceptual identification: Effects of primeprocessing requirements.Memory & Cognition,21, 125–137.
Cañas, J. J. (1990). Associative strength effects in the lexical decision task.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,42A, 121–145.
Chiarello, C., Richards, L., &Pollock, A. (1992). Semantic additivity and semantic inhibition: Dissociable processes in the cerebral hemispheres?Brain & Language,42, 52–76.
Clark, H. H. (1970). Word association and linguistic theory. In J. Lyons (Ed.),New horizons in linguistics (pp. 271–286). London: Penguin.
Cohen, J. (1988).Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Collins, A. M., &Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing.Psychological Review,82, 407–428.
Coney, J., &Serna, P. (1995). Creative thinking from an information processing perspective: A new approach to Mednik’s theory of associative hierarchies.Journal of Creative Behavior,29, 109–132.
De Groot, A. M. B. (1984). Primed lexical decision: Combined effects of the proportion of related prime-target pairs and the stimulus-onset asynchrony of prime and target.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,36A, 253–280.
De Groot, A. M. B. (1985). Word-context effects in word naming and lexical decision.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,37A, 281–297.
De Groot, A. M. B. (1989). Representational aspects of word imageability and word frequency as assessed through word association.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 824–845.
De Groot, A. M. B., Thomassen, A. J. W. M., &Hudson, P. T. W. (1982). Associative facilitation of word recognition as measured from a neutral prime.Memory & Cognition,10, 358–370.
Den Heyer, K., Briand, K., &Dannenbring, G. L. (1983). Strategic factors in a lexical-decision task: Evidence for automatic and attentiondriven processes.Memory & Cognition,11, 374–381.
Dosher, B. A., &Rosedale, G. (1989). Integrated retrieval cues as a mechanism for priming in retrieval from memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,118, 191–211.
Erdfelder, E., Faul, F., &Buchner, A. (1996). GPOWER: A general power analysis program.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,28, 1–11.
Fischler, I. (1977). Semantic facilitation without association in a lexical decision task.Memory & Cognition,5, 335–339.
Gernsbacher, M. A. (1984). Resolving 20 years of inconsistent interaction between lexical familiarity and orthography, concreteness, and polysemy.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,113, 256- 281.
Hays, W. L. (1997).Statistics. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace.
Hopfield, J. J. (1982). Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,79, 2554–2558.
Kahan, T. A., Neely, J. H., &Forsythe, W. J. (1999). Dissociated backward priming effects in lexical decision and pronunciation tasks.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,6, 105–110.
Kawamoto, A. H. (1993). Nonlinear dynamics in the resolution of lexical ambiguity: A parallel distributed processing account.Journal of Memory & Language,32, 474–516.
Koriat, A. (1981). Semantic facilitation in lexical decision as a function of prime-target association.Memory & Cognition,9, 587–598.
Landauer, T. K., &Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato’s problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction and representation of knowledge.Psychological Review,104, 211–240.
Landauer, T. K., Foltz P., &Laham, D. (1998). Introduction to latent semantic analysis.Discourse Processes,25, 259–284.
Masson, M. E. (1991). A distributed memory model of context effects in word recognition. In D. Besner & G. Humphreys (Eds.),Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition (pp. 233–263). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Masson, M. E. (1995). A distributed memory model of semantic priming.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 3–23.
McKoon, G., &Ratcliff, R. (1992). Spreading activation versus compound cue accounts of priming: Mediated priming revisited.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 1155–1172.
McNamara, T. P., &Altarriba, J. (1988). Depth of spreading activation revisited: Semantic mediated priming occurs in lexical decisions.Journal of Memory & Language,27, 545–559.
McRae, K., &Boisvert, S. (1998). Automatic semantic similarity priming.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24, 558–572.
McRae, K., de Sa, V. R., &Seidenberg, M. S. (1997). On the nature and scope of featural representations of word meaning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,126, 99–130.
Moss, H. E., Ostrin, R. K., Tyler, L. K., &Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1995). Accessing different types of lexical semantic information: Evidence from priming.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 863–883.
Neely, J. H. (1977). Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited capacity attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,106, 226–254.
Neely, J. H. (1991). Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. In D. Besner & G. Humphreys (Eds.),Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition (pp. 264–336). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Neely, J. H., &Keefe, D. E. (1989). Semantic context effects on visual word processing: A hybrid prospective/retrospective processing theory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 24, pp. 207–248). San Diego: Academic Press.
Neely, J. H., Keefe, D. E., &Ross, K. L. (1989). Semantic priming in the lexical decision task: Roles of prospective prime-generated expectancies and retrospective semantic matching.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 1003–1019.
Noble, C. E. (1952). An analysis of meaning.Psychological Review,59, 421–430.
Plaut, D. C. (1995). Semantic and associative priming in a distributed attractor network.Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.
Posner, M. I., &Snyder, C. R. R. (1975). Attention and cognitive control. In R. L. Solso (Ed.),Information processing and cognition: The Loyola symposium (pp. 55–85). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Ratcliff, R., &McKoon, G. (1988). A retrieval theory of priming in memory.Psychological Review,95, 385–408.
Rubenstein, O., Anaki, D., & Henik, A. (2003).Norms of free associations in the Hebrew language. Manuscript in preparation.
Schneider, W. (1988). Micro Experimental Laboratory: An integrated system for IBM PC compatibles.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,20, 206–217.
Seidenberg, M. S., Waters, G. S., Sanders, M., &Langer, P. (1984). Pre- and postlexical loci of contextual effects on word recognition.Memory & Cognition,12, 315–328.
Sharkey, A. J. C., &Sharkey, N. E. (1992). Weak contextual constraints in text and word priming.Journal of Memory & Language,31, 543–572.
Shelton, J. R., &Martin, R. C. (1992). How semantic is automatic semantic priming?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 1191–1210.
Siegel, S., & Castellan, N. J. (1988).Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Spence, D. P., &Owens, K. C. (1990). Lexical co-occurrence and association strength.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research,19, 317–330.
Spreen, O., &Schultz, R.W. (1966). Parameters of abstraction, meaningfulness, and pronunciability for 329 nouns.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,5, 459–468.
Stolz, J. A., &Neely, J. H. (1995). When target degradation does and does not enhance semantic context effects in word recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 596–611.
Szalay, L. B., &Deese, J. (1978).Subjective meaning and culture: An assessment through word association. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Warren, R. E. (1974). Association, directionality, and stimulus encoding.Journal of Experimental Psychology,102, 151–158.
Warren, R. E. (1977). Time and the spread of activation in memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,3, 458–466.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported in part by the Kreitman Doctoral Fellowship to D.A. and the Israel Science Foundation, founded by the Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities to A.H.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Anaki, D., Henik, A. Is there a “strength effect” in automatic semantic priming?. Memory & Cognition 31, 262–272 (2003). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194385
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194385