Abstract
Studies onspatial frameworks suggest that the way we locate objects in imagined environments is influenced by the physical and functional properties of the world and our body. The present study provides evidence that such an influence also characterizes imagined navigation. In Experiment 1, participants followed spatial directions to construct an imagined path, while either keeping constant or updating their orientation at each step. A pattern of step times diagnostic of spatial frameworks was obtained in the updated-orientation but not in the constant-orientation condition. In Experiment 2, participants performed the updated-orientation condition with two levels of external support for the reference frame being used. Step times conformed to the predictions of spatial frameworks in both conditions. Both experiments also provided support that the processes involved in imagined navigation exhibit the operator-operand dynamics of other mental skills previously documented in the mental arithmetic domain. These results reinforce Piaget’s (1954) notion that spatial displacements and integer arithmetic share a set of structural characteristics.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Artez, A. J. (1991). The design of electronic map displays.Human Factors,33, 85–101.
Avraamides, M. N. (2002).Spatial updating of environments described in texts. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Bryant, D. J., Lanca, M., &Tversky, B. (1995). Spatial concepts and perception of physical and diagrammed scenes.Perceptual & Motor Skills,81, 531–546.
Bryant, D. J., &Tversky, B. (1992). Assessing spatial frameworks with object and direction probes.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,30, 29–32.
Bryant, D. J., Tversky, B., &Franklin, N. (1992). Internal and external spatial frameworks for representing described scenes.Journal of Memory & Language,31, 74–98.
Bryant, D. J., &Wright, G. W. (1999). How body asymmetries determine accessibility in spatial frameworks.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,52A, 487–508.
Carlson, R. A. (1997).Experienced cognition. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Carlson, R. A., &Sohn, M.-H. (2000). Cognitive control of multistep routines: Information processing and conscious intentions. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.),Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 443–464). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Carr, W., &Roskos-Ewoldsen, B. (1999). Spatial orientation by mental transformation.Psychological Research,62, 36–47.
Chapman, M. (1988).Constructive evolution: Origins and development of Piaget’s thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Clark, H. H. (1973). Space, time, semantics, and the child. In T. Moore (Ed.),Cognitive development and the acquisition of language (pp. 27–63). New York: Academic Press.
Corballis, M. C., &Beale, I. L. (1976).The psychology of left and right. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
De Vega, M., &Rodrigo, M. J. (2001). Updating spatial layouts mediated by pointing and labelling under physical and imaginary rotation.European Journal of Cognitive Psychology,13, 369–393.
De Vega, M., Rodrigo, M. J., &Zimmer, H. (1996). Pointing and labeling directions in egocentric frameworks.Journal of Memory & Language,35, 821–839.
Franklin, N., &Tversky, B. (1990). Searching imagined environments.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,119, 63–76.
Hintzman, D., O’Dell, C., &Arndt, D. (1981). Orientation in cognitive maps.Cognitive Psychology,13, 149–206.
Jeannerod, M. (1995). Mental imagery in the motor context.Neuropsychologia,33, 1419–1432.
Kosslyn, S. M. (1987). Seeing and imagining in the cerebral hemispheres: A computational approach.Psychological Review,94, 148–175.
Kosslyn, S. M. (1994).Image and brain: The resolution of the imagery debate. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Maki, R. H. (1979). Processing relative locations in a natural space.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,14, 25–28.
Maki, R. H., Grandy, C. A., &Hauge, G. (1979). Why is telling right from left more difficult than telling above from below?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,5, 52–67.
Piaget, J. (1954).The construction of reality in the child. New York: Ballantine.
Reder, L. M., &Schunn, C. (1996). Metacognition does not imply awareness: Strategy choice is governed by implicit learning and memory. In L.M. Reder (Ed.),Implicit memory and metacognition (pp. 45–77). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Shepard, R., &Hurwitz, S. (1984). Upward direction, mental rotation, and discrimination of left and right turns on maps.Cognition,18, 161–193.
Sohn, M.-H., &Carlson, R. A. (1998). Procedural frameworks for simple arithmetic skills.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24, 1052–1067.
Tversky, B., Morrison, J. B., Franklin, N., &Bryant, D. J. (1999). Three spaces of spatial cognition.Professional Geographer,51, 516- 524.
Vecchi, T., &Girelli, L. (1998). Gender differences in visuo-spatial processing: The importance of distinguishing between passive storage and active manipulation.Acta Psychologica,99, 1–16.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Avraamides, M.N., Carlson, R.A. Egocentric organization of spatial activities in imagined navigation. Memory & Cognition 31, 252–261 (2003). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194384
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194384