Abstract
According to dominant models of reasoning by analogy, analogical transfer requires subjects to first define a full one-to-one correspondence between the base and the target problems. Accordingly, these models predict that if there is a cross-mapping between the base and the target (cross-mapping exists when similar or identical elements in the base and the target play different roles), the time spent transferring a property from the base to the target will be greater. The present results are inconsistent with this prediction. Indeed, if the mapping task is more difficult in the cross-mapping condition than in the control condition, the time needed to make the transfer is not affected by the presence of a cross-mapping. Consequently, we conclude that the mapping phase is not a necessary condition for transfer.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Barsalou, L. W. (1982). Context-independent and context-dependent information in concepts.Memory & Cognition,10, 82–93.
Barsalou, L. W. (1983). Ad hoc categories.Memory & Cognition,11, 211–227.
Bassok, M., &Medin, D. L. (1997). Birds of a feather flock together: Similarity judgments with semantically rich stimuli.Journal of Memory & Language,36, 311–336.
Bassok, M., Wu, L. L., &Olseth, K. L. (1995). Judging a book by its cover: Interpretative effects of content on problem-solving transfer.Memory & Cognition,23, 354–367.
Bowdle, B. F., &Gentner, D. (1997). Informativity and asymmetry in comparisons.Cognitive Psychology,34, 244–286.
Bransford, J. D., &Franks, J. J. (1971). The abstraction of linguistic ideas.Cognitive Psychology,2, 331–350.
Catrambone, R., &Holyoak, K. J. (1989). Overcoming contextual limitations on problem-solving transfer.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 1147–1156.
Cauzinille-Marmèche, E., &Didierjean, A. (1999). Raisonnement par analogie et généralisation de connaissances [Reasoning by analogy and knowledge generalization]. In G. Netchine-Grynberg (Ed.),Développement et fonctionnement cognitif: Vers une intégration (pp. 125–152). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Collins, A. M., Brown, J. S., &Larkin, K. M. (1980). Inferences in text understanding. In R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce, & W. F. Brewer (Eds.),Theoretical issues in reading comprehension (pp. 385–407). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Eskridge, T. C. (1994). A hybrid model of continuous analogical reasoning. In K. J. Holyoak & J. A. Barnden (Eds.),Advances in connectionist and neural computation theory: Vol. 2, Analogical connections (pp. 207–246).Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Falkenhainer, B., Forbus, K. D., &Gentner, D. (1989). The structuremapping engine: Algorithm and examples.Artificial Intelligence,41, 1–63.
Gentner, D. (1989). The mechanisms of analogical learning. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.),Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 199–241). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gentner, D., &Toupin, C. (1986). Systematicity and surface similarity in the development of analogy.Cognitive Science,10, 277–300.
Gick, M. L., &Holyoak, K. J. (1983). Schema induction and analogical transfer.Cognitive Psychology,15, 1–38.
Goldstone, R. L. (1994a). Influence of categorization on perceptual discrimination.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,123, 178–200.
Goldstone, R. L. (1994b). Similarity, interactive activation and mapping.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,20, 3–28.
Goldstone, R. L., Lippa, Y., &Shiffrin, R. M. (2001). Altering object representations through category learning.Cognition,78, 27–43.
Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., &Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension.Psychological Review,3, 371–395.
Holyoak, K. J. (1984). Analogical thinking and human intelligence. In R. Sternberg (Ed.),Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (Vol. 2, pp. 199–230). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Holyoak, K. J., &Barnden, J. A. (1994). Introduction. In K. J. Holyoak & J. A. Barnden (Eds.),Advances in connectionist and neural computation theory (Vol. 1, pp. 1–27). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Holyoak, K. J., Novick, L. R., &Melz, E. R. (1994). Component processes in transfer. In K. J. Holyoak & J. A. Barnden (Eds.),Advances in connectionist and neural computation theory (Vol. 1, pp. 113–180). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Holyoak, K. J., &Thagard, P. (1989). Analogical mapping by constraint satisfaction.Cognitive Science,13, 295–355.
Hummel, J. E., &Holyoak, K. J. (1997). Distributed representations of structure: A theory of analogical access and mapping.Psychological Review,2, 427–466.
Keane, M. T., Ledgeway, T., &Stuart, D. (1994). Constraints on analogical mapping: A comparison of three models.Cognitive Science,18, 387–438.
Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A constructive-integration model.Psychological Review,95, 163–182.
Kintsch, W. (1992). How readers construct situation models for stories: The role of syntactic cues and causal inferences. In A. F. Healy, S. M. Kosslyn, & R. M. Shiffrin (Eds.),From learning processes to cognitive processes: Essays in honor of William K. Estes (Vol. 2, pp. 261–278). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Love, C. L., Rouder, J. N., &Wisniewski, E. J. (1999). A structural account of global and local processing.Cognitive Psychology,28, 291–316.
Markman, A. B. (1997). Constraints on analogical inference.Cognitive Science,21, 373–418.
Markman, A. B., &Gentner, D. (1993). Structural alignment during similarity comparisons.Cognitive Psychology,25, 431–467.
McKoon, G., &Ratcliff, R. (1992). Inference during reading.Psychological Review,99, 440–466.
Medin, D. L., Goldstone, R. L., &Gentner, D. (1993). Respects for similarity.Psychological Review,100, 254–278.
Medin, D. L., &Ross, B. H. (1989). The specific character of abstract thought: Categorization, problem solving, and induction.In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.),Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (Vol. 5, pp. 189–223). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Metcalfe, J., &Wiebe, D. (1987). Intuition in insight and noninsight problem solving.Memory & Cognition,15, 238–246.
Murphy, G. L., &Ross, B. H. (1994). Prediction from uncertain categorizations.Cognitive Psychology,27, 148–193.
Novick, L. R., &Holyoak, K. J. (1991). Mathematical problem solving by analogy.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17, 398–415.
Reeves, L. M., &Weisberg, R. W. (1994). The role of content and abstract information in analogical transfer.Psychological Bulletin,3, 381–400.
Ripoll, T. (1998). Why this makes me think of that.Thinking & Reasoning,4, 15–43.
Ripoll, T., Bourrelly, L., Antoni, F., &Pélissier, A. (2000). The role of pragmatic constraints in the processing of analogous cross-mapping situations.Current Psychology Letters,1, 25–37.
Ripoll, T., &Coulon, D. (2001). Le raisonnement par analogie: Une analyse descriptive et critique des modèles du mapping [Reasoning by analogy: A descriptive and critical analysis of current models of mapping].L’Année Psychologique,101, 289–323.
Ross, B. H. (1987). This is like that: The use of earlier problems and the separation of similarity effects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,13, 629–639.
Ross, B. H. (1989). Distinguishing types of superficial similarities: Different effects on the access and use of earlier problems.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 456–468.
Ross, B. H. (1996). Category representations and the effects of interacting with instances.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,22, 1249–1265.
Ross, B. H., &Bradshaw, G. L. (1994). Encoding effects of remindings.Memory & Cognition,22, 591–605.
Ross, B. H., &Kilbane, M. C. (1997). Effects of principle explanation and superficial similarity on analogical mapping in problem solving.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 427–440.
Sander, E. (2000).Ľanalogie, du naïf au créatif: Analogie et catégorisation [Analogy; from the naive to the creative: Analogy and categorization]. Paris: ĽHarmattan.
Schunn, C. D., &Dunbar, K. (1996). Priming, analogy, and awareness in complex reasoning.Memory & Cognition,24, 271–284.
Schyns, P. G., Goldstone, R. L., &Thibaut, J. (1998). Development of features in object concepts.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,21, 1–54.
Schyns, P. G., &Rodet, L. (1997). Categorization creates functional features.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 681–696.
Seifert, C. M., Abelson, R. P., McKoon, G., &Ratcliff, R. (1986). Memory connections between thematically similar episodes.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,12, 220–231.
Wisniewski, E. J., &Bassok, M. (1999). What makes a man similar to a tie? Stimulus compatibility with comparison and integration.Cognitive Psychology,39, 208–238.
Wisniewski, E. J., &Medin, D. (1994). On the interaction of theory and data in concept learning.Cognitive Science,18, 221–282.
Zamani, M., &Richard, J.-F. (2000). Object encoding, goal similarity, and analogical transfer.Memory & Cognition,28, 873–886.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ripoll, T., Brude, T. & Coulon, D. Does analogical transfer involve a term-to-term alignment?. Memory & Cognition 31, 221–230 (2003). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194381
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194381