Abstract
The mental model theory assumes that people reason by manipulating mental representations of states of the world, called “mental models.” In the present study we used a new deduction task based on diagrammatic premises. We show that a premise can prime other premises that induce similar mental models in a way analogous to the case of words with related meanings, which can prime one another. We present three experiments. In Experiment 1 we used an evaluation task. In Experiment 2, a construction task was used. The priming effect was obtained in both cases. In a third experiment we show that the priming effect was still present when participants were instructed to ignore a prime displayed before the premises. In all three experiments we compared determinate and indeterminate problems and found faster responses in the former.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bauer, M. I., &Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1993). How diagrams can improve reasoning.Psychological Science,4, 372–378.
Bell, V., &Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1998). A model theory of modal reasoning.Cognitive Science,22, 25–51.
Betsch, T., &Fiedler, K. (1999). Understanding conjunction effects in probability judgments: The role of implicit mental models.European Journal of Social Psychology,29, 75–93.
Braine, M. D. S., &O’Brien, D. (1998).Mental logic. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Braine, M. D. S., Reiser, B. J., &Rumain, B. (1984). Some empirical justification for a theory of natural propositional reasoning. In G.H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 18, pp. 313–371). New York: Academic Press.
Byrne, R. M. J., &Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1989). Spatial reasoning.Journal of Memory & Language,28, 564–575.
Byrne, R. M. J., &Tasso, A. (1999). Deductive reasoning with factual, possible, and counterfactual conditionals.Memory & Cognition,27, 726–740.
Cohen, J., MacWhinney, B., Platt, M., &Provost, J. (1993). PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,25, 257–271.
Evans, J. St. B. T. (1984). Heuristic and analytic processes in reasoning.British Journal of Psychology,75, 451–468.
Evans, J. St. B. T. (1989).Bias in human reasoning: Causes and consequences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Evans, J. St. B. T. (1998). Matching bias in conditional reasoning: Do we understand it after 25 years?Thinking & Reasoning,4, 45–82.
Evans, J. St. B. T., &Lynch, J. S. (1973). Matching bias in the selection task.British Journal of Psychology,64, 391–397.
Evans, J. St. B. T., Newstead, S. E., &Byrne, R. M. J. (1993).Human reasoning: The psychology of deduction. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Fazio, R. H., Jackson, J. R., Dunton, B. C., &Williams, C. J. (1995). Variability in automatic activation as an unobtrusive measure of racial attitudes: A bona fide pipeline?Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,69, 1013–1027.
García-Madruga, J. A., Moreno, S., Carriedo, N., Gutiérrez, F., &Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2001). Are conjunctive inferences easier than disjunctive inferences?Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,54A, 613–632.
Garnham, A., Traxler, M., Oakhill, J., &Gernsbacher, M. A. (1996). The locus of implicit causality effects in comprehension.Journal of Memory & Language,35, 517–543.
Gernsbacher, M. A. (1997). Coherence cues mapping during comprehension. In J. Costermans & M. Fayol (Eds.),Processing interclausal relationships (pp. 3–21). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Gernsbacher, M. A., &Faust, M. (1995). Skilled suppression. In F. N. Dempster & C. J. Brainerd (Eds.),Interference and inhibition in cognition (pp. 299–324). San Diego: Academic Press.
Girotto, V., Mazzocco, A., &Tasso, A. (1997). The effect of premise order in conditional reasoning: A test of the mental model theory.Cognition,63, 1–28.
Glenberg, A. M. (1997). What is memory for?Behavioural & Brain Science,20, 1–55.
Glenberg, A. M., Meyer, M., &Lindem, K. (1987). Mental models contribute to foregrounding during text comprehension.Journal of Memory & Learning,26, 69–83.
Hagert, G. (1984). Modeling mental models: Experiments in cognitive modeling spatial reasoning. In T. O’Shea (Ed.),Advances in artificial intelligence (pp. 389–398). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Hess, D. J., Foss, D. J., &Carroll, P. (1995). Effects of global and local context on lexical processing during language comprehension.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,124, 62–82.
Inhelder, B., &Piaget, J. (1958).The growth of logical thinking. New York: Basic Books.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983).Mental models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1999). Deductive reasoning.Annual Review,50, 109–135.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2000). Illusions and models: A reply to Barrouillet and Lecas.Cognition,76, 175–178.
Johnson-Laird, P. N., &Byrne, R. M. J. (1991).Deduction. Hove, U.K.: Erlbaum.
Johnson-Laird, P. N., Byrne, R. M. J., &Schaeken, W. S. (1992). Propositional reasoning by model.Psychological Review,99, 418–439.
Johnson-Laird, P. N., &Savary, F. (1999). Illusory inferences: A novel class of erroneous deductions.Cognition,71, 191–229.
Langston, W., Kramer, D. C., &Glenberg, A. M. (1998). The representation of space in mental models derived from text.Memory & Cognition,26, 247–262.
Lea, R. B. (1995). On-line evidence for elaborative logical inferences in text.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 1469–1482.
Legrenzi, P., Girotto, V., &Johnson-Laird, P. (1993). Focusing in reasoning and decision-making.Cognition,49, 37–66.
Maybery, M. T., Bain, J. D., &Halford, G. S. (1986). Informationprocessing demands of transitive inference.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,12, 600–613.
Meyer, D. E., &Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1971). Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: Evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations.Journal of Experimental Psychology,90, 227–234.
Neely, J. H. (1991). Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. In D. Besner & G. W. Humphreys (Eds.),Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition (pp. 264–336). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Polk, T. A., &Newell, A. (1995). Deduction as verbal reasoning.Psychological Review,102, 533–566.
Ratcliff, R., &McKoon, G. (1988). A retrieval theory of priming.Psychological Review,95, 385–408.
Rips, L. J. (1994).The psychology of proof. Cambridge, MA: Routledge.
Roberts, M. J. (1998a). How should relevance be defined? What does inspection time measure? A reply to Evans.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,51A, 815–817.
Roberts, M. J. (1998b). Inspection times and the selection task: Are they relevant?Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,51A, 781–810.
Santamaría, C., &Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2000). An antidote to illusory inferences.Thinking & Reasoning,6, 313–333.
Schaeken, W. S., Johnson-Laird, P. N., &d’Ydewalle, G. (1996). Tense, aspect, and temporal reasoning.Thinking & Reasoning,2, 309–327.
Thompson, V. A. (2000). The task-specific nature of domain-general reasoning.Cognition,76, 209–268.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by grants from the Spanish government (PB94-0394).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Moreno-Ríos, S., García-Madruga, J.A. Priming in deduction: A spatial arrangement task. Memory & Cognition 30, 1118–1127 (2002). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194329
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194329