Advertisement

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

, Volume 14, Issue 2, pp 200–206 | Cite as

Generalizing test-enhanced learning from the laboratory to the classroom

  • Mark A. Mcdaniel
  • Henry L. Roediger
  • Kathleen B. Mcdermott
Applying cognitive psychology to education

Abstract

Test-enhanced learning refers to the fact that taking an initial test on studied material enhances its later retention relative to simply studying the material and then taking a final test. Most research on the testing effect has been done with materials such as word lists, and the general finding has been that the benefits of testing are greater when the initial test is a recall (production) test rather than a recognition test. We briefly summarize three experiments that extend these results to educationally relevant materials, namely brief articles, lectures, and materials in a college course. All three experiments demonstrated a robust testing effect and also revealed that an initial short-answer test produced greater gains on a final test than did an initial multiple-choice test. Furthermore, one experiment revealed a positive effect of immediate feedback given with the initial test. The educational implications are that production tests (short answer or essay) and feedback soon after learning increase learning and retention. In addition, frequent testing probably has the indirect positive effects of keeping students motivated and leading them to space out periods of study.

Keywords

Retention Interval Initial Test Final Test Testing Effect Short Answer 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Amlund, J. T., Kardash, C. A., &Kulhavy, R. W. (1986). Repetitive reading and recall of expository text.Reading Research Quarterly,21, 49–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bjork, R. A. (1975). Retrieval as a memory modifier: An interpretation of negative recency and related phenomena. In R. L. Solso (Ed.),Information processing and cognition: The Loyola Symposium (pp. 123–144). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  3. Butler, A. C., & Roediger, H. L., III (in press). Testing improves long term retention in a simulated classroom setting.European Journal of Cognitive Psychology.Google Scholar
  4. Carpenter, S. K., &DeLosh, E. L. (2006). Impoverished cue support enhances subsequent retention: Support for the elaborative retrieval explanation of the testing effect.Memory & Cognition,34, 268–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carrier, M., &Pashler, H. (1992). The influence of retrieval on retention.Memory & Cognition,20, 633–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cooper, A. J. R., &Monk, A. (1976). Learning for recall and learning for recognition. In J. Brown (Ed.),Recall and recognition (pp. 131–156). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  7. Darley, C. F., &Murdock, B. B. (1971). Effects of prior free recall testing on final recall and recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology,91, 66–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gates, A. I. (1917). Recitation as a factor in memorizing.Archives of Psychology, Whole No. 40, 1–104.Google Scholar
  9. Glover, J. A. (1989). The “testing” phenomenon: Not gone but nearly forgotten.Journal of Educational Psychology,81, 392–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hogan, R. M., &Kintsch, W. (1971). Differential effects of study and test trials on long-term recognition and recall.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,10, 562–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jones, H. E. (1923/1924). The effects of examination on the performance of learning.Archives of Psychology, Whole No. 10, 1–70.Google Scholar
  12. Kang, S. H. K., McDermott, K. B., & Roediger, H. L., III (in press). Test format and corrective feedback modify the effect of testing on long-term retention.European Journal of Cognitive Psychology.Google Scholar
  13. Mandler, G., &Rabinowitz, J. C. (1981). Appearance and reality: Does a recognition test really improve subsequent recall and recognition?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 7, 79–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. McDaniel, M. A., Anderson, J. L., Derbish, M. H., & Morrisette, N. (in press). Testing the testing effect in the classroom.European Journal of Cognitive Psychology.Google Scholar
  15. McDaniel, M. A., &Fisher, R. P. (1991). Tests and test feedback as learning sources.Contemporary Educational Psychology,16, 192–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. McDaniel, M. A., &Masson, M. E. J. (1985). Altering memory representations through retrieval.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,11, 371–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pashler, H., Cepeda, N. J., Wixted, J. T., &Rohrer, D. (2005). When does feedback facilitate learning of words?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,31, 3–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Roediger, H. L., III, &Karpicke, J. D. (2006a). The power of testing memory: Basic research and implications for educational practice.Perspectives on Psychological Science,1, 181–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Roediger, H. L., III, &Karpicke, J. D. (2006b). Test-enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves long-term retention.Psychological Science,17, 249–255.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Sikorski, J. F., Rich, K., Saville, B. K., Buskist, W., Drogan, O., &Davis, S. F. (2002). Student use of introductory texts: Comparative survey findings from two universities.Teaching of Psychology,29, 312–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Spitzer, H. F. (1939). Studies in retention.Journal of Educational Psychology,30, 641–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Thomas, A. K., &McDaniel, M. A. (2007). Metacomprehension for educationally relevant materials: Dramatic effects of encoding-retrieval interactions.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,14, 212–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wenger, S. K., Thompson, C. P., &Bartling, C. A. (1980). Recall facilitates subsequent recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,6, 135–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark A. Mcdaniel
    • 1
  • Henry L. Roediger
    • 1
  • Kathleen B. Mcdermott
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyWashington University in St. LouisSt. Louis

Personalised recommendations