Abstract
We employed a novel version of the serial reaction time task to test the idea that human implicit learning allows the simultaneous learning of multiple independent contingencies and that this learning may proceed in the absence of attention. Using probabilistic sequences, we showed that both a primary sequence (the focus of the experimental task) and a statistically independent secondary sequence could be learned across 4,800 target localization trials, provided the perceptual load of the primary task was low. However, learning of the secondary sequence was abolished under conditions of high perceptual load. These findings suggest that there are attentional limitations on the learning of multiple contingencies.
Article PDF
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Cock, J. J., Berry, D. C., &Buchner, A. (2002). Negative priming and sequence learning.European Journal of Cognitive Psychology,14, 27–48.
Jiménez, L. (2003). Intention, attention, and consciousness in probabilistic sequence learning. In L. Jiménez (Ed.),Attention and implicit learning (pp. 43–68). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Jiménez, L., &Méndez, C. (1999). Which attention is needed for implicit sequence learning?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,25, 236–259.
Lavie, N. (2005). Distracted and confused? Selective attention under load.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,9, 75–82.
Mayr, U. (1996). Spatial attention and implicit sequence learning: Evidence for independent learning of spatial and nonspatial sequences.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,22, 350–364.
Reber, A. S. (1993).Implicit learning and tacit knowledge: An essay on the cognitive unconscious. New York: Oxford University Press.
Rowland, L. A., &Shanks, D. R. (2006). Sequence learning and selection difficulty.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,32, 287–299.
Schmidtke, V., &Heuer, H. (1997). Task integration as a factor in secondary-task effects on sequence learning.Psychological Research,60, 53–71.
Schvaneveldt, R.W., &Gomez, R. L. (1998). Attention and probabilistic sequence learning.Psychological Research,61, 175–190.
Shanks, D. R. (2003). Attention and awareness in “implicit” sequence learning. In L. Jiménez (Ed.),Attention and implicit learning (pp. 11–42). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Shanks, D. R., Rowland, L. A., &Ranger, M. S. (2005). Attentional load and implicit sequence learning.Psychological Research,69, 369–382.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The research described here was supported by a grant from the United Kingdom Economic and Social Research Council.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rowland, L.A., Shanks, D.R. Attention modulates the learning of multiple contingencies. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 13, 643–648 (2006). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193975
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193975