Abstract
Matching stimuli across a range of influencing variables is no less important for studies of face recognition than it is for those of word processing. Whereas a number of corpora exist to allow experimenters to select a carefully controlled set of word stimuli, similar databases for famous faces do not exist. This article, therefore, provides researchers in the area of face recognition with a useful resource on which to base their stimulus selection. In the first phase of the investigation, British adults over 40 years of age were requested to generate the names of famous people (or celebrities) that they thought they would recognize and to write these down. The most frequently named celebrities were then rated by adults from the same age population for familiarity, distinctiveness, and age of acquisition. The result is a database of 696 famous people, with an indication of their relative eminence in the public consciousness and rated for these important variables. Phoneme counts are also provided for each famous person, together with family name frequency counts in the general population, where available. Materials and links may be accessed at www.psychonomic.org/archive.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Alario, F.-X., &Ferrand, L. (1999). A set of 400 pictures standardized for French: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, visual complexity, image variability, and age of acquisition. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,31, 531–552.
Alario, F.-X., Ferrand, L., Laganaro, M., New, B., Frauenfelder, U. H., &Segui, J. (2004). Predictors of picture naming speed. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,36, 140–155.
Baayen, H., Piepenbrock, R., &van Rijn, H. (1993).The CELEX lexical database [CD-ROM]. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Linguistic Data Consortium.
Barca, L., Burani, C., &Arduino, L. S. (2002). Word naming times and psycholinguistic norms for Italian nouns. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,34, 424–434.
Barry, C., Morrison, C. M., &Ellis, A. W. (1997). Naming the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures: Effects of age of acquisition, frequency, and name agreement. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,50A, 560–585.
Bates, E., Burani, C., D’Amico, S., &Barca, L. (2001). Word reading and picture naming in Italian. Memory & Cognition,29, 986–999.
Bird, H., Franklin, S., &Howard, D. (2001). Age of acquisition and imageability ratings for a large set of words, including verbs and function words. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,33, 73–79.
Bonin, P., Chalard, M., Méot, A., &Fayol, M. (2002). The determinants of spoken and written picture naming latencies. British Journal of Psychology,93, 89–114.
Brédart, S. (1993). Retrieval failures in face naming. Memory,1, 351–366.
Brysbaert, M., Lange, M., &Van Wijnendaele, I. V. (2000). The effects of age-of-acquisition and frequency-of-occurrence in visual word recognition: Further evidence from the Dutch language. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology,12, 65–85.
Carroll, J. B., &White, M. N. (1973). Age-of-acquisition norms for 220 picturable nouns. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,12, 563–576.
Coltheart, M. (1981). The MRC Psycholinguistic Database. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,33A, 497–505.
Cortese, M. J., &Fugett, A. (2004). Imageability ratings for 3,000 monosyllabic words. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,36, 384–387.
Cuetos, F., Ellis, A.W., &Alvarez, B. (1999). Naming times for the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures in Spanish. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,31, 650–658.
Cycowicz, Y. M., Friedman, D., Rothstein, M., &Snodgrass, J. G. (1997). Picture naming by young children: Norms for name agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,65, 171–237.
Ferrand, L., &New, B. (2003). Syllabic length effects in visual word recognition and naming. Acta Psychologica,113, 167–183.
Gernsbacher, M. A. (1984). Resolving 20 years of inconsistent interactions between lexical familiarity and orthography, concreteness, and polysemy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,113, 256–281.
Gilhooly, K. J., &Logie, R. H. (1980a). Age-of-acquisition, imagery, concreteness, familiarity, and ambiguity measures for 1,944 words. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation,12, 395–427.
Gilhooly, K. J., &Logie, R. H. (1980b). Meaning-dependent ratings of imagery, age of acquisition, familiarity, and concreteness for 387 ambiguous words. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation,12, 428–450.
Hodgson, C., &Ellis, A. W. (1998). Last in, first to go: Age of acquisition and naming in the elderly. Brain & Language,64, 146–163.
Humphreys, G., Riddoch, M. J., &Quinlan, P. T. (1988). Cascade processes in picture identification. Cognitive Neuropsychology,5, 67–103.
Jones, D. (1997).English pronouncing dictionary (15th ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Klapp, S. T., Anderson, W. G., &Berrian, R. W. (1973). Implicit speech in reading, reconsidered. Journal of Experimental Psychology,100, 368–374.
Ladefoged, P. (1993).A course in phonetics (3rd ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Lewis, M. B. (1999). Age of acquisition in face categorisation: Is there an instance-based account? Cognition,71, B23-B39.
Masterson, J., &Druks, J. (1998). Description of a set of 164 nouns and 102 verbs matched for printed word frequency, familiarity and age-of-acquisition. Journal of Neurolinguistics,11, 331–354.
Meyer, A. S., Roelofs, A. P. A., &Levelt, W. J. M. (2003). Word length effects on object naming: Role of a response criterion. Journal of Memory & Language,48, 131–147.
Moore, V. M. (1998).The effects of age of acquisition in processing people’s faces and names. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Durham.
Moore, V. [M.], Smith-Spark, J. H., &Valentine, T. (2004). The effects of age of acquisition on object recognition. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology,16, 417–439.
Moore, V. [M.], & Valentine, T. (1993).Names count: An assessment of surname frequencies in North-West England. Unpublished database.
Moore, V. [M.], &Valentine, T. (1998). The effect of age of acquisition on speed and accuracy of naming famous faces. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,51A, 485–513.
Moore, V. [M.], &Valentine, T. (1999). The effects of age of acquisition in processing famous faces and names: Exploring the locus and proposing a mechanism. In M. Hahn & S. C. Stoness (Eds.),Proceedings of the Twenty-First Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 416–421). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Morrison, C. M., Chappell, T. D., &Ellis, A. W. (1997). Age of acquisition norms for a large set of object names and their relation to adult estimates and other variables. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,50A, 528–559.
Morrison, C. M., &Ellis, A. W. (1995). The roles of word frequency and age of acquisition in word naming and lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 116–133.
Morrison, C. M., Ellis, A. W., &Quinlan, P. T. (1992). Age of acquisition, not word frequency, affects object naming, not object recognition. Memory & Cognition,20, 705–714.
Paivio, A., Yuille, J. D., &Madigan, S. A. (1968). Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Monograph Supplement,76(1, Pt. 2), 1–25.
Pind, J., &Tryggvadóttir, H. B. (2002). Determinants of picture naming in Icelandic. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology,43, 221–226.
Rendell, P. G., Castel, A. D., &Craik, F. I. M. (2005). Memory for proper names in old age: A disproportionate impairment? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,58A, 54–71.
Rizzo, S., Venneri, A., &Papagno, C. (2002). Famous face recognition and naming test: A normative study. Neurological Sciences,23, 153–159.
Sarno, J. A., &Alley, T. R. (1997). Attractiveness and the memorability of faces: Only a matter of distinctiveness? American Journal of Psychology,110, 81–92.
Snodgrass, J. G., &Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,6, 174–215.
Snodgrass, J. G., &Yuditsky, T. (1996). Naming times for the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,28, 516–536.
Sommer, W., Heinz, A., Leuthold, H., Matt, J., &Schweinberger, S. R. (1995). Metamemory, distinctiveness, and event-related potentials in recognition memory for faces. Memory & Cognition,23, 1–11.
Spreen, O., &Schulz, R. W. (1966). Parameters of abstraction, meaningfulness, and pronunciability for 329 nouns. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,5, 459–468.
Stuart, M., Dixon, M., Masterson, J., &Gray, B. (2003). Children’s early reading vocabulary: Description and word frequency lists. British Journal of Educational Psychology,73, 585–598.
Szekely, A., Jacobsen, T., D’Amico, S., Devescovi, A., Andonova, E., Herron, D., et al. (2004). A new on-line resource for psycholinguistic studies. Journal of Memory & Language,51, 247–250.
Turner, J. E., Valentine, T., &Ellis, A. W. (1998). Contrasting effects of age of acquisition and word frequency on auditory and visual lexical decision. Memory & Cognition,26, 1282–1291.
Valentine, T. (1991). A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion, and race in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,43A, 161–204.
Valentine, T., Brédart, S., Lawson, R., &Ward, G. (1991). What’s in a name? Access to information from people’s names. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology,3, 147–176.
Valentine, T., Brennen, T., &Brédart, S. (1996).The cognitive psychology of proper names: On the importance of being Ernest. London: Routledge.
Valentine, T., &Bruce, V. (1986). The effects of distinctiveness in recognising and classifying faces. Perception,15, 525–535.
Valentine, T., &Moore, V. (1995). Naming faces: The effects of facial distinctiveness and surname frequency. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,48A, 849–878.
Vitkovitch, M., &Tyrrell, L. (1995). Sources of disagreement in object naming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,48A, 822–848.
Zevin, J. D., &Seidenberg, M. S. (2002). Age of acquisition effects in word reading and other tasks. Journal of Memory & Language,47, 1–29.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by Economic and Social Science Research Council Grant R000429624208 awarded to V.M. and T.V. We thank all the participants who kindly contributed their time and effort to the work reported in this article.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Smith-Spark, J.H., Moore, V., Valentine, T. et al. Stimulus generation, ratings, phoneme counts, and group classifications for 696 famous people by British adults over 40 years of age. Behavior Research Methods 38, 590–597 (2006). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193890
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193890