Abstract
This article introduces the software program called EthoSeq, which is designed to extract probabilistic behavioral sequences (tree-generated sequences, or TGSs) from observational data and to prepare a TGS-species matrix for phylogenetic analysis. The program uses Graph Theory algorithms to automatically detect behavioral patterns within the observational sessions. It includes filtering tools to adjust the search procedure to user-specified statistical needs. Preliminary analyses of data sets, such as grooming sequences in birds and foraging tactics in spiders, uncover a large number of TGSs which together yield single phylogenetic trees. An example of the use of the program is our analysis of felid grooming sequences, in which we have obtained 1,386 felid grooming TGSs for seven species, resulting in a single phylogeny. These results show that behavior is definitely useful in phylogenetic analysis. EthoSeq simplifies and automates such analyses, uncovers much of the hidden patterns of long behavioral sequences, and prepares this data for further analysis with standard phylogenetic programs. We hope it will encourage many empirical studies on the evolution of behavior.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Alberts, C. C. (1996).O comportamento de autolimpeza do gato doméstico (Felis catus) e uma proposta para usá-lo como caractere filogenético. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of São Paulo.
Annable, A., &Wearden, J. H. (1979). Grooming movements as operants in the rat.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,32, 297–304.
Atz, J. W. (1970). The application of the idea of homology to behavior. In L. R. Aronson, E. Tobach, D. S. Lehrman, & J. S. Rosenblatt (Eds.),Development and evolution of behavior: Essays in honor of T. C. Schneirla (pp. 53–74). San Francisco: Freeman.
Bakeman, R., &Gottman, J. M. (1997).Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bakeman, R., &Quera, V. (1995).Analyzing interaction: Sequential analysis with SDIS and GSEQ. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Berridge, K. C. (1990). Comparative fine structure of action: Rules of form and sequence in the grooming patterns of six rodent species.Behaviour,113, 21–56.
Brooks, D. R., &McLennan, D. A. (1991).Phylogeny, ecology, and behavior: A research program in comparative biology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Brown, M. B. (1974). Identification of the sources of significance in two-way contingency tables.Applied Statistics,23, 405–413.
Busacker, R. G., &Saaty, T. L. (1965).Finite graphs and networks. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Caires, R. A., &Japyassú, H. F. (2003). Predatory plasticity in a new spider species: An expression of web architecture?Revista de Etologia,5, 149–150.
De Queiroz, A., &Wimberger, P. H. (1993). The usefulness of behavior for phylogeny estimation: Levels of homoplasy in behavioral and morphological characters.Evolution,47, 46–60.
Fentress, J. C. (1973). Development of grooming in mice with amputated forelimbs.Science,179, 704–705.
Forey, P. L., Humphries, C. J., Kitching, I. L., Scotland, R. W., Siebert, D. J., &Williams, D. M. (1992).Cladistics: A practical course in systematics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Clarendon Press.
Galera, C. A., Toyoda, C. Y., & Dobrianskyj, L. N. (1983).Descrição etológica dos comportamentos de ratos albinos. Monografia em Etologia, Departamento de Psicologia Experimental, Instituto de Psicologia da Universidade de São Paulo.
Garcia, C. R. M., & Japyassú, H. F. (2005). Stereotypy and plasticity in the predatory sequence ofTheridion evexum, Keyserling 1884 (Araneae: Theridiidae).Biota Neotropica,5(1A). Available at www .biotaneotropica.org.br/v5n1a/en/abstract?article+BN001051a2005.
Gittleman, J. L. (Ed.) (1991).Carnivore behavior, ecology and evolution. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Goodman, L. A. (1968). The analysis of cross-classified data: Independence, quasi-independence, and interactions in contingency tables with or without missing entries.Journal of the American Statistical Association,63, 1091–1131.
Gould, S. J. (1966). Allometry and size in ontogeny and phylogeny.Biological Reviews,41, 587–640.
Gould, S. J. (2002).The structure of evolutionary theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, Belknap Press.
Greene, H. W. (1994). Homology and behavioral repertoires. In B. K. Hall (Ed.),Homology: The hierarchical basis of comparative biology (pp. 369–391). San Diego: Academic Press.
Haberman, S. J. (1973). The analysis of residuals in cross-classified tables.Biometrics,29, 205–220.
Haccou, P., &Meelis, E. (1992).Statistical analysis of behavioral data: An approach based on time-structured models. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hazlett, B. A. (Ed.) (1977).Quantitative methods in the study of animal behavior. New York: Academic Press.
Hennig, W. (1966).Phylogenetic systematics. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
Hooff, J. A. R. A. M. van (1982). Categories and sequences of behavior: Methods of description and analysis. In K. R. Scherer & P. Ekman (Eds.),Handbook of methods in nonverbal behavior research (pp. 362–439). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Japyassú, H. F., Alberts, C. C., Izar, P., & Sato, T. (2003). Sinal filogenético em seqüências comportamentais longas: A plasticidade introduz ruído na análise? InIV Encontro de Aracnólogos do Cone Sul,4, 44–45.
Japyassú, H. F., & Jotta, E. G. (2005). Foraging inAchaearanea cinnabarina Levi 1963 (Araneae, Theridiidae) and evolution of hunting in spiders with irregular webs.Biota Neotropica,5(1A). Available at www.biotaneotropica.org.br/v5n1a/en/abstract?article+BN0030 51a2005.
Japyassú, H. F., &Viera, C. (2002). Predatory plasticity inNephilengys cruentata (Araneae, Tetragnathidae): Relevance for phylogeny reconstruction.Behaviour, 139, 529–544.
Konorski, J. (1967).Integrative activity of the brain. Chicago: Univesity of Chicago Press.
Magnusson, M. S. (2000). Discovering hidden time patterns in behavior: T-patterns and their detection.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,32, 93–110.
Martins, E. P. (1996).Phylogenies and the comparative method in animal behavior. New York: Oxford University Press.
McLennan, D. A., Brooks, D. R., &McPhail, J. D. (1988). The benefits of communication between comparative ethology and phylogenetic systematics: A case study using gasterosteid fishes.Canadian Journal of Zoology,66, 2177–2190.
Noldus, L. P. J. J., Trienes, R. J. H., Hendriksen, A. H. M., Jansen, H., &Jansen, R. G. (2000). The Observer Video-Pro: New software for the collection, management, and presentation of time-structured data from videotapes and digital media files.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,32, 197–206.
Odling-Smee, F. J., Laland, K. N., &Feldman, M. W. (2003).Niche construction: The neglected process in evolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Oliveira, A. P. F. (2002).Comportamento social de machos e fêmeas castrados do gato doméstico (Felis catus) em confinamento. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of São Paulo.
Ottoni, E. B. (2000). EthoLog 2.2: A tool for the transcription and timing of behavior observation sessions.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,32, 446–449.
Paterson, A. M., Wallis, G. P., &Gray, R. D. (1995). Penguins, petrels, and parsimony: Does cladistic analysis of behavior reflect seabird phylogeny?Evolution,49, 974–989.
Prum, R. O. (1994). Phylogenetic analysis of the evolution of alternative social behavior in the manakins (Aves: Pipridae).Evolution,48, 1657–1675.
Quadros, A. H. (2002).Filogenia da família Cathartidae (Aves) baseada em comportamento de autolimpeza. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of São Paulo.
Shettleworth, S. F. (1972). Constraints on learning. In D. S. Lehrman, R. A. Hinde, & E. Shaw (Eds.),Advances in the study of behavior (pp. 4.1–4.68). New York: Academic Press.
Slater, P. J. B. (1973). Describing sequences of behavior. In P. P. G. Bateson & P. H. Klopfer (Eds.),Perspectives in ethology (pp. 131–153). New York: Plenum.
Slikas, B. (1998). Recognizing and testing homology of courtship displays in storks (Aves: Ciconiiformes: Ciconiidae).Evolution,52, 884–893.
Swofford, D. L. (2002). PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and other methods) (Version 4) [Computer software]. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
H.F.J. was supported by a grant from FAPESP, P.I. was supported by a grant from CAPES, and T.S. was supported by a grant from Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Japyasú, H.F., Alberts, C.C., Izar, P. et al. EthoSeq: A tool for phylogenetic analysis and data mining in behavioral sequences. Behavior Research Methods 38, 549–556 (2006). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193884
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193884