Abstract
When two people see the same event and discuss it, one person’s memory report can influence what the other person subsequently claims to remember. We refer to this asmemory conformity. In the present article, two factors underlying the memory conformity effect are investigated. First, are there any characteristics of the dialogue that predict memory conformity? Second, is memory conformity differentially affected when information is encountered that omits, adds to, or contradicts originally encoded items? Participants were tested in pairs. The two members of each pair encoded slightly different versions of complex scenes and discussed them prior to an individual free recall test. The discussions were audiotaped, transcribed, and analyzed. Our most striking finding was that the witness initiating the discussion was most likely to influence the other witness’s memory report. Furthermore, witnesses were most likely to be influenced when an additional (previously unseen) item of information was encountered in the discussion.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Cialdini, R. B., &Goldstein, N. J. (2004). Social influence: Compliance and conformity.Annual Review of Psychology,55, 591–621.
Deutsch, M., &Gerard, H. G. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influence upon individual judgement.Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology,59, 204–209.
Edwards, D., &Middleton, D. (1986). Joint remembering: Constructing an account of shared experience through conversational discourse.Discourse Processes,8, 177–204.
Forbes, K. E., &Venneri, A. (2003). A case for case: Handling letter case selection in written spelling.Neuropsychologia,41, 16–24.
Gabbert, F., & Allan, K. (2005).I still think it was a banana: The persistent distorting after-effect of normative social influence on memory. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Gabbert, F., Memon, A., &Allan, K. (2003). Memory conformity: Can eyewitnesses influence each other’s memories for an event?Applied Cognitive Psychology,17, 533–543.
Gabbert, F., Memon, A., Allan, K., &Wright, D. B. (2004). Say it to my face: Examining the effects of socially encountered misinformation.Legal & Criminological Psychology,9, 215–227.
Kanematsu, H., Mori, K., &Mori, H. (2003). Memory distortion in eyewitness pairs who observed nonconforming events and discussed them.Journal of the Faculty of Education, Shinshu University,109, 75–84.
Loftus, E. F. (1979).Eyewitness testimony. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Loftus, E. F., Levidow, B., &Deunsing, S. (1992). Who remembers best? Individual differences in memory for events that occurred in a science museum.Applied Cognitive Psychology,6, 93–107.
Loftus, E. F., Miller, D. G., &Burns, H. J. (1978). Semantic integration of verbal information into a visual memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,4, 19–31.
Marsh, E. J., Tversky, B., &Hutson, M. (2005). How eyewitnesses talk about events: Implications for memory.Applied Cognitive Psychology,19, 531–544.
Meade, M. L., &Roediger, H. L.,III (2002). Explorations in the social contagion of memory.Memory & Cognition,30, 995–1009.
Pasupathi, M., Stallworth, L. M., & Murdoch, K. (1998). How what we tell becomes what we know: Listener effects on speakers’ long-term memory for events.Discourse Processes,26, 1–25.
Rasbash, J., Steele, F., Browne, W., &Prosser, B. (2004).A user’s guide to MLwiN (Version 2.0). London: Institute of Education.
Reysen, M. B. (2005). The effects of conformity on recognition judgements.Memory,13, 87–94.
Roediger, H. L., III,Meade, M. L., & Bergman, E. T. (2001). Social contagion of memory.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,8, 365–371.
Schooler, J. W., Gerhard, D., &Loftus, E. F. (1986). Qualities of the unreal.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,12, 171–181.
Wright, D. B. (1998). Modelling clustered data in autobiographical memory research: The multilevel approach.Applied Cognitive Psychology,12, 339–357.
Wright, D. B., Loftus, E. F., &Hall, M. (2001). Now you see it; now you don’t: Inhibiting recall and recognition of scenes.Applied Cognitive Psychology,15, 471–482.
Wright, D. B., Mathews, S. A., &Skagerberg, E. M. (2005). Social recognition memory: The effect of other people’s responses for previously seen and unseen items.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied,11, 200–209.
Wright, D. B., Self, G., &Justice, C. (2000). Memory conformity: Exploring misinformation effects when presented by another person.British Journal of Psychology,91, 189–202.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gabbert, F., Memon, A. & Wright, D.B. Memory conformity: Disentangling the steps toward influence during a discussion. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 13, 480–485 (2006). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193873
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193873