Abstract
Bacon and Egeth (1994) proposed that observed instances of attentional capture by feature singletons (e.g., color) were the result of a salience-based strategy adopted by subjects (singleton detection mode) and, thus, were not automatic. They showed that subjects could override capture by adopting strategies based on searching for specific target features (feature search mode). However, Theeuwes (2004) has recently argued that Bacon and Egeth’s results arose from experimental confounds. He elaborated a model in which attentional capture must be expected when salient distractors fall within a spatialwindow of attention. According to Theeuwes’s (2004) model, there exist two essential criteria for examining stimulus-driven capture. First, search latencies cannot increase with display size, since the search must be parallel; second, the salience of the irrelevant distractor must not be compromised by characteristics of the search display. Contrary to the predictions of Theeuwes’s (2004) model, we provide evidence that involuntary capture can be overridden when both of these criteria are met. Our results are consistent with Bacon and Egeth’s proposal.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bacon, W. F., &Egeth, H. E. (1994). Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture.Perception & Psychophysics,55, 485–496.
Bravo, M. J., &Nakayama, K. (1992). The role of attention in different visual-search tasks.Perception & Psychophysics,51, 465–472.
Duncan, J., &Humphreys, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity.Psychological Review,96, 433–458.
Egeth, H. (1977). Attention and preattention. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 11, pp. 277–320). New York: Academic Press.
Eriksen, C. W., &Yeh, Y.-Y. (1985). Allocation of attention in the visual field.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,11, 583–597.
Folk, C. L., Leber, A. B., &Egeth, H. E. (2002). Made you blink! Contingent attentional capture produces a spatial blink.Perception & Psychophysics,64, 741–753.
Folk, C. L., &Remington, R. W. (1998). Selectivity in distraction by irrelevant featural singletons: Evidence for two forms of attentional capture.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 847–858.
Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., &Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,18, 1030–1044.
Green, B. F., &Anderson, L. K. (1956). Color coding in a visual search task.Journal of Experimental Psychology,51, 19–24.
Jonides, J., &Yantis, S. (1988). Uniqueness of abrupt visual onset in capturing attention.Perception & Psychophysics,43, 346–354.
Lamy, D., Carmel, T., Egeth, H. E., & Leber, A. B. (in press). Effects of search mode and intertrial priming on singleton search.Perception & Psychophysics.
Lamy, D., &Tsal, Y. (1999). A salient distractor does not disrupt conjunction search.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,6, 93–98.
Leber, A. B., & Egeth, H. E. (in press). Attention on autopilot: Past experience and attentional set.Visual Cognition.
Nothdurft, H.-C. (1993). The role of features in preattentive vision: Comparison of orientation, motion and color cues.Vision Research,33, 1937–1958.
Pashler, H. (1988). Cross-dimensional interaction and texture segregation.Perception & Psychophysics,43, 307–318.
Pinto, Y., Olivers, C. N. L., &Theeuwes, J. (2005). Target uncertainty does not lead to more distraction by singletons: Intertrial priming does.Perception & Psychophysics,67, 1354–1361.
Posner, M. I., Snyder, C. R., &Davidson, B. J. (1980). Attention and the detection of signals.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,109, 160–174.
Teichner, W. H., &Krebs, M. J. (1974). Laws of visual choice reaction time.Psychological Review,81, 75–98.
Theeuwes, J. (1990). Perceptual selectivity is task dependent: Evidence from selective search.Acta Psychologica,74, 81–99.
Theeuwes, J. (1991a). Cross-dimensional perceptual selectivity.Perception & Psychophysics,50, 184–193.
Theeuwes, J. (1991b). Exogenous and endogenous control of attention: The effect of visual onsets and offsets.Perception & Psychophysics,49, 83–90.
Theeuwes, J. (1992). Perceptual selectivity for color and form.Perception & Psychophysics,51, 599–606.
Theeuwes, J. (1996). Perceptual selectivity for color and form: On the nature of the interference effect. In A. F. Kramer, M. G. H. Coles, & G. D. Logan (Eds.),Converging operations in the study of visual attention (pp. 297–314). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Theeuwes, J. (2004). Top-down search strategies cannot override attentional capture.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,11, 65–70.
Theeuwes, J., &Burger, R. (1998). Attentional control during visual search: The effect of irrelevant singletons.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 1342–1353.
Todd, S., &Kramer, A. F. (1994). Attentional misguidance in visual search.Perception & Psychophysics,56, 198–210.
Townsend, J. T. (1971). A note on the identifiability of parallel and serial processes.Perception & Psychophysics,10, 161–163.
Turatto, M., &Galfano, G. (2001). Attentional capture by color without any relevant attentional set.Perception & Psychophysics,63, 286–297.
Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided Search 2.0: A revised model of visual search.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,1, 202–238.
Yantis, S., &Egeth, H. E. (1999). On the distinction between visual salience and stimulus-driven attentional capture.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,25, 661–676.
Yantis, S., &Jonides, J. (1984). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Evidence from visual search.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,10, 601–621.
Yantis, S., &Jonides, J. (1990). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Voluntary versus automatic allocation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,16, 121–134.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported in part by Grant 2001-G-020 from the TSA. We thank Angus Gellatly, Bryan Burnham, and an anonymous reviewer for thoughtful comments and suggestions on a previous version of the manuscript.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Leber, A.B., Egeth, H.E. It’s under control: Top-down search strategies can override attentional capture. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 13, 132–138 (2006). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193824
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193824