Abstract
It is known that dense objects seem heavier than larger, less dense objects of the same weight. We have investigated a related illusion, in which visual context biases the apparent weight of a single object. The apparatus is a cabin on a steep hillside near Santa Cruz, CA, tilted 17° from vertical. From its ceiling hangs a weight on a chain. The cabin’s tilt makes the weight appear suspended at an angle. Pushing the weight toward the visually based vertical is perceived as difficult, whereas pushing it away from the visual vertical is perceived as easy. Seven subjects pushed the weight in both directions, judging required effort on a double-anchored 1–10 scale. All experienced the effort illusion, with no significant subject effect. When subjects’ eyes were closed, the effect was smaller but still present. Apparently proprioceptive and skin inputs, equal for both directions, are ignored or underweighted as visually based expectations influence perceived effort.
Article PDF
References
Bridgeman, B., Gemmer, A., Forsman, T., &Huemer, V. (2000). Processing spatial information in the sensorimotor branch of the visual system.Vision Research,40, 3539–3552.
Charpentier, A. (1891). Analyse expérimentale de quelques éléments de la sensation de poids [Experimental analysis of some aspects of weight perception].Archives de Physiologie Normale et Pathologique,3, 122–135.
Ellis, R. R., &Lederman, S. J. (1993). The role of haptic versus visual volume cues in the size-weight illusion.Perception & Psychophysics,53, 315–324.
Flanagan, J. R., &Beltzner, M. A. (2000). Independence of perceptual and sensorimotor predictions in the size-weight illusion.Nature Neuroscience,3, 737–741.
Fleury, M., Bard, C., Teasdale, N., Paillard, J., Cole, J., Lajoie, Y., &Lamarre, Y. (1995). Weight judgment: The discrimination capacity of a deafferented subject.Brain,118, 1149–1156.
Haggard, P., Newman, C., Blundell, J., &Andrew, H. (2000). The perceived position of the hand in space.Perception & Psychophysics,68, 363–377.
Johansson, R. S., &Westling, G. (1984). Roles of glabrous skin receptors and sensorimotor memory in automatic control of precision grip when lifting rougher or more slippery objects.Experimental Brain Research,56, 550–564.
Johansson, R. S., &Westling, G. (1988). Coordinated isometric muscle commands adequately and erroneously programmed for the weight during lifting task with precision grip.Experimental Brain Research,71, 59–71.
Làdavas, E., Farnè, A., Zeloni, G., &di Pellegrino, G. (2000). Seeing or not seeing where your hands are.Experimental Brain Research,131, 458–467.
Milner, A. D., &Goodale, M. A. (1995).The visual brain in action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pick, H. L., Jr., &Pick, A. D. (1967). A developmental and analytic study of the size-weight illusion.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,5, 362–371.
Shimamura, A. P., &Prinzmetal, W. (1999). The Mystery Spot illusion and its relation to other visual illusions.Psychological Science,10, 501–507.
Vogt, D. B. (1996).Gravitational mystery spots of the United States: Explained using the theory of multidimensionality. Bellevue, WA: Vector Associates.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bridgeman, B. Influence of visually induced expectation on perceived motor effort: A visual-proprioceptive interaction at the Santa Cruz Mystery Spot. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 12, 549–552 (2005). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193803
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193803