Abstract
It was investigated whether an observer would simulate another person’s inhibitory and error processes. Two participants sitting next to each other performed a stop signal task in which they occasionally had to try and inhibit their response when indicated to do so by a stop signal. They could either successfully stop the response or fail to stop and, thereby, make an error. An aftereffect of the other person’s successful action inhibition and error was obtained: The participants became slower and more accurate when they observed the other person make an error on the previous trial and when they observed a successful stop. The results suggest that observing another person successfully inhibit an action or make an error evokes processes similar to those that occur when these behaviors are produced.
References
Bach, P., &Tipper, S. P. (2007). Implicit action encoding influences personal-trait judgments.Cognition,102, 151–178.
Bates, A. T., Patel, T. P., &Liddle, P. F. (2005). External behavior monitoring mirrors internal behavior monitoring: Error-related negativity for observed errors.Journal of Psychophysiology,19, 281–288.
Blakemore, S.-J., &Decety, J. (2001). From the perception of action to the understanding of intention.Nature Reviews Neuroscience,2, 561–567.
Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., &Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control.Psychological Review,108, 624–652.
Brass, M., Bekkering, H., Wohlschläger, A., &Prinz, W. (2000). Compatibility between observed and executed finger movements: Comparing symbolic, spatial, and imitative cues.Brain & Cognition,44, 124–143.
Castiello, U. (2003). Understanding other people’s actions: Intention and attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,29, 416–430.
Curtis, C. E., Cole, M. W., Rao, V. Y., &D’Esposito, M. (2005). Canceling planned action: An fMRI study of countermanding saccades.Cerebral Cortex,15, 1281–1289.
De Jong, R., Coles, M. G. H., Logan, G. D., &Gratton, G. (1990). In search of the point of no return: The control of response processes.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,16, 164–182.
di Pellegrino, G., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., &Rizzolatti, G. (1992). Understanding motor events: A neurophysiological study.Experimental Brain Research,91, 176–180.
Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Pavesi, G., &Rizzolatti, G. (1995). Motor facilitation during action observation: A magnetic stimulation study.Journal of Neurophysiology,73, 2608–2611.
Frith, C. D., &Frith, U. (1999). Interacting minds—a biological basis.Science,286, 1692–1695.
Gallese, V., &Goldman, A. (1998). Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind-reading.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,2, 493–501.
Gallese, V., Keysers, C., &Rizzolatti, G. (2004). A unifying view of the basis of social cognition.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,8, 396–403.
Garavan, H., Ross, T. J., Murphy, K., Roche, R. A. P., &Stein, E. A. (2002). Dissociable executive functions in the dynamic control of behavior: Inhibition, error detection, and correction.Neuro Image,17, 1820–1829.
Grèzes, J., Armony, J. L., Rowe, J., &Passingham, R. E. (2003). Activations related to “mirror” and “canonical” neurones in the human brain: An fMRI study.Neuro Image,18, 928–937.
Holroyd, C. B., Nieuwenhuis, S., Mars, R. B., &Coles, M. G. H. (2004). Anterior cingulate cortex, selection for action, and error processing. In M. I. Posner (Ed.),Cognitive neuroscience of attention (pp. 219–231). New York: Guilford.
Houghton, G., &Tipper, S. P. (1996). Inhibitory mechanisms of neural and cognitive control: Applications to selective attention and sequential action.Brain & Cognition,30, 20–43.
Iacoboni, M., Molnar-Szakacs, I., Gallese, V., Buccino, G., Mazziotta, J. C., &Rizzolatti, G. (2005). Grasping the intentions of others with one’s own mirror neuron system.Public Library of Science,3, 529–535.
Ivanoff, J., &Klein, R. M. (2001). The presence of a nonresponding effector increases inhibition of return.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,8, 307–314.
Jacob, P., &Jeannerod, M. (2005). The motor theory of social cognition: A critique.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,9, 21–25.
Jeannerod, M. (2001). Neural simulation of action: A unifying mechanism for motor cognition.Neuro Image,14, 103–109.
Kilner, J. M., Paulignan, Y., &Blakemore, S. J. (2003). An interference effect of observed biological movement on action.Current Biology,13, 522–525.
Kilner, J. M., Vargas, C., Duval, S., Blakemore, S. J., &Sirigu, A. (2004). Motor activation prior to observation of a predicted movement.Nature Neuroscience,7, 1299–1301.
Knoblich, G., &Jordan, J. S. (2003). Action coordination in groups and individuals: Learning anticipatory control.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,29, 1006–1016.
Logan, G. D. (1994). On the ability to inhibit thought and action: A users’ guide to the stop-signal paradigm. In D. Dagenbach & T. H. Carr (Eds.),Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 214–249). San Diego: Academic Press.
Logan, G. D., &Cowan, W. B. (1984). On the ability to inhibit thought and action: A theory of an act of control.Psychological Review,91, 295–327.
Rabbitt, P. M. A. (1966). Errors and error correction in choice-response tasks.Journal of Experimental Psychology,71, 264–272.
Rabbitt, P. M. A., &Rodgers, B. (1977). What does a man do after he makes an error? An analysis of response programming.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,29, 727–743.
Ramnani, N., &Miall, R. C. (2004). A system in the human brain for predicting the actions of others.Nature Neuroscience,7, 85–90.
Rieger, M., &Gauggel, S. (1999). Inhibitory after-effects in the stopsignal paradigm.British Journal of Psychology,90, 509–518.
Rizzolatti, G., Fogassi, L., &Gallese, V. (2001). Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding of imitation of action.Nature Reviews Neuroscience,2, 661–669.
Schachar, R. J., Chen, S., Logan, G. D., Ornstein, T. J., Crosbie, J., Ickowicz, A., &Pakulak, A. (2004). Evidence for an error monitoring deficit in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology,32, 285–293.
Sebanz, N., Knoblich, G., &Prinz, W. (2003). Representing others’ actions: Just like one’s own?Cognition,88, B11-B21.
Sebanz, N., Knoblich, G., &Prinz, W. (2005). How two share a task: Corepresenting stimulus—response mappings.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,31, 1234–1246.
Taylor, T. L., &Ivanoff, J. (2003). The interplay of stop signal inhibition and inhibition of return.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,56A, 1349–1371.
Tipper, S. P. (1985). The negative priming effect: Inhibitory priming by ignored objects.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,37A, 571–590.
van Boxtel, G. J. M., van der Molen, M. W., &Jennings, J. R. (2005). Differential involvement of the anterior cingulate cortex in performance monitoring during a stop-signal task.Journal of Psychophysiology,19, 1–10.
van Schie, H. T., Mars, R. B., Coles, M. G. H., &Bekkering, H. (2004). Modulation of activity in medial frontal and motor cortices during error observation.Nature Neuroscience,7, 549–554.
Wilson, M., &Knoblich, G. (2005). The case for motor involvement in perceiving conspecifics.Psychological Bulletin,131, 460–473.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work was supported by a Wellcome Trust Programme Grant awarded to S.P.T.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schuch, S., Tipper, S.P. On observing another person’s actions: Influences of observed inhibition and errors. Perception & Psychophysics 69, 828–837 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193782
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193782
Keywords
- Previous Trial
- Stop Signal
- Previous Performance
- Stop Trial
- Reaction Time Analysis