Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in
Menu
Find a journal Publish with us Track your research
Search
Cart
  1. Home
  2. Perception & Psychophysics
  3. Article

Tactile spatial sensitivity and anisotropy

  • Published: August 2005
  • Volume 67, pages 1061–1079, (2005)
  • Cite this article
Download PDF
Perception & Psychophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript
Tactile spatial sensitivity and anisotropy
Download PDF
  • Gregory O. Gibson1 &
  • James C. Craig1 
  • 1346 Accesses

  • Explore all metrics

Abstract

A gap detection task was examined for its usefulness as a measure of tactile spatial sensitivity and as a measure of anisotropy. In Experiment 1, sensitivity was measured with a gap detection task both with and without a latex glove at three locations on the hand: the fingerpad, fingerbase, and palm. Results showed that sensitivity varied as a function of location and was correlated with changes in the density of innervation of the primary afferent fibers. In accord with other measures of spatial sensitivity, the glove had a moderate effect on sensitivity in the gap detection task. The results both with and without the glove were more similar to those obtained using another measure of spatial sensitivity, the grating orientation task, than to those obtained using the smooth-grooved task, which is considered an intensive measure. In Experiments 2-4, anisotropy was examined using the gap detection and grating orientation tasks, as well as the smooth-grooved task. Locations on the index finger, palm, and arm were tested. Results indicated that anisotropy was revealed only by tasks that relied on spatial cues. The differences between spatial sensitivity measured in the proximal-distal orientation as compared with the lateral-medial orientation varied by location and were as much as 2.35/1. The results are discussed in terms of what they may reveal about the underlying mechanisms responsible for tactile anisotropy.

Article PDF

Download to read the full article text

Similar content being viewed by others

Tactile distance anisotropy on the feet

Article 08 July 2021

Hand posture, but not vision of the hand, affects tactile spatial resolution in the grating orientation discrimination task

Article Open access 08 September 2022

Anisotropies of tactile distance perception on the face

Article 02 July 2020
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

References

  • Appelle, S. (1972). Perception and discrimination as a function of stimulus orientation: The “oblique effect” in man and animals.Psychological Bulletin,78, 266–278.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boring, E. G. (1942).Sensation and perception in the history of experimental psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, S. A., Allard, T., Jenkins, W. M., &Merzenich, M. M. (1988). Receptive fields in the body-surface map in adult cortex defined by temporally correlated inputs.Nature,332, 444–445.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Craig, J. C. (1999). Grating orientation as a measure of tactile spatial acuity.Somatosensory & Motor Research,16, 197–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craig, J. C., &Johnson, K. O. (2000). The two-point threshold: Not a measure of tactile spatial resolution.Current Directions in Psychological Science,9, 29–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craig, J. C., &Kisner, J. M. (1998). Factors affecting tactile spatial acuity.Somatosensory & Motor Research,15, 29–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craig, J. C., &Lyle, K. B. (2001). A comparison of tactile spatial sensitivity on the palm and fingerpad.Perception & Psychophysics,63, 337–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, J. C., &Lyle, K. B. (2002). A correction and a comment on Craig and Lyle (2001).Perception & Psychophysics,64, 504–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darian-Smith, I., &Kenins, P. (1980). Innervation density of mechanoreceptive fibers supplying glabrous skin of the monkey’s index finger.Journal of Physiology,309, 147–155.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Valois, R. L., Yund, E. W., &Hepler, N. (1982). The orientation and direction selectivity of cells in macaque visual cortex.Vision Research,22, 531–544.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Essock, E. A., Krebs, W. K., &Prather, J. R. (1992). An anisotropy of human tactile sensitivity and its relation to the visual oblique effect.Experimental Brain Research,91, 520–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Essock, E. A., Krebs, W. K., &Prather, J. R. (1997). Superior sensitivity for tactile stimuli oriented proximally-distally on the finger: Implications for mixed Class 1 and Class 2 anisotropies.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,23, 515–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedline, C. L. (1918). The discrimination of cutaneous patterns below the two-point limen.American Journal of Psychology,29, 400–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, J. L., &Brown, P. B. (1984). Two-point discriminability: Relation to properties of the somatosensory system.Somatosensory & Motor Research,2, 163–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geldard, F. A. (1975).Sensory saltation metastability in the perceptual world. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geldard, F. A., &Sherrick, C. E. (1983). The cutaneous saltatory area and presumed neural basis.Perception & Psychophysics,33, 299–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, G. O., &Craig, J. C. (2002). Relative roles of spatial and intensive cues in the discrimination of spatial tactile stimuli.Perception & Psychophysics,64, 1095–1107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, B. G. (1982). The perception of distance and location for dual tactile pressures.Perception & Psychophysics,31, 315–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, D. M., &Swets, J. A. (1966).Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenspan, J. D., &Bolanowski, S. J. (1996). The psychophysics of tactile perception and its peripheral physiological basis. In L. Kruger (Ed.),Pain and touch (pp. 25–103). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao, S. S., Lane, J., &Fitzgerald, P. (2002). Representation of orientation in the somatosensory system.Behavioural Brain Research,135, 93–103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson, R. S., &Vallbo, Å. B. (1979). Tactile sensibility in the human hand: Relative and absolute densities of four types of mechanoreceptive units in glabrous skin.Journal of Physiology,286, 283–300.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson, R. S., &Vallbo, Å. B. (1983). Tactile sensory coding in the glabrous skin of the human hand.Trends in Neurosciences,6, 27–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, K. O., &Hsiao, S. S. (1992). Neural mechanisms of tactual form and texture perception.Annual Review of Neuroscience,15, 227–250.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, K. O., &Phillips, J. R. (1981). Tactile spatial resolution: I. Two-point discrimination, gap detection, grating resolution, and letter recognition.Journal of Neurophysiology,46, 1177–1191.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, K. O., &Phillips, J. R. (1984). Spatial and nonspatial neural mechanisms underlying tactile spatial discrimination. In C. von Euler, O. Franzén, U. Lindblom, & D. Ottoson (Eds.),Wenner-Gren International Symposium Series: Vol. 41. Somatosensory mechanisms (pp. 237–248). London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, K. O., Van Boven, R. W., &Hsiao, S. S. (1994). The perception of two points is not the spatial resolution threshold. In J. Boivie, P. Hansson, & U. Lindblom (Eds.),Touch, temperature, and pain in health and disease: mechanisms and assessments (11th ed., pp. 389–404). Seattle: IASP Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E. G. (1981). Anatomy of cerebral cortex: Columnar input-output organization. In F. O. Schmidt, F. G. Worden, G. Adelman, & S. G. Dennis (Eds.),The organization of the cerebral cortex (pp. 199–235). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M. B., &Vierck, C. J. (1973). Length discrimination on the skin.American Journal of Psychology,86, 49–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M. B., Vierck, C. J., &Graham, R. B. (1973). Line-gap discrimination of the skin.Perceptual & Motor Skills,36, 563–570.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keegan, J. J., &Garrett, F. D. (1948). The segmental distribution of the cutaneous nerves in the limb of man.Anatomical Record,102, 409–437.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • LaMotte, R. H., &Srinivasan, M. A. (1987a). Tactile discrimination of shape: Responses of rapidly adapting mechanoreceptive afferents to a step stroked across the monkey fingerpad.Journal of Neuroscience,7, 1672–1681.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • LaMotte, R. H., &Srinivasan, M. A. (1987b). Tactile discrimination of shape: Responses of slowly adapting mechanoreceptive afferents to a step stroked across the monkey fingerpad.Journal of Neuroscience,7, 1655–1671.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lechelt, E. C. (1988). Spatial asymmetries in tactile discrimination of line orientation: A comparison of the sighted, visually impaired, and blind.Perception,17, 579–585.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lechelt, E. C. (1992). Tactile spatial anisotropy with static stimulation.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,30, 140–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, D. K., McGillis, L. B., &Greenspan, J. D. (1996). Somatotopic localization of thermal stimuli I: A comparison of within- versus across-dermatomal separation of innocuous thermal stimuli.Somatosensory & Motor Research,13, 67–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leventhal, A. G., &Hirsch, H. V. (1977). Effects of early experience upon orientation sensitivity and binocularity of neurons in visual cortex of cats.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,74, 1272–1276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loomis, J. M., &Lederman, S. J. (1986). Tactual perception. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.),Handbook of perception and human performance (chap. 31, pp. 1–41). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, R. J. (1974). Neural basis of orientation perception in primate vision.Science,186, 1133–1135.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, R. J., &Ronner, S. F. (1978). Orientation anisotropy in monkey visual cortex.Brain Research,149, 229–234.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Orban, G. A., &Kennedy, H. (1981). The influence of eccentricity on receptive field types and orientation selectivity in areas 17 and 18 of the cat.Brain Research,208, 203–208.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Patel, J., Essick, G. K., &Kelly, D. G. (1997). Utility of square-wave gratings to assess perioral spatial acuity.Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery,55, 593–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, J. R., &Johnson, K. O. (1981). Tactile spatial resolution: II. Neural representation of bars, edges, and gratings in monkey primary afferents.Journal of Neurophysiology,46, 1192–1203.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sathian, K., &Zangaladze, A. (1996). Tactile spatial acuity at the human fingertip and lip: Bilateral symmetry and interdigit variability.Neurology,46, 1464–1466.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, J. C., Alvarez-Reeves, M., Dipietro, L., Mack, G. W., &Green, B. G. (2003). Decline of tactile acuity in aging: A study of body site, blood flow, and lifetime habits of smoking and physical activity.Somatosensory & Motor Research,20, 271–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, J. C., &Choo, K. K. (1996). Spatial acuity of the body surface over the life span.Somatosensory & Motor Research,13, 153–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, J. C., &Patterson, M. Q. (1995). Dimensions of spatial acuity in the touch sense: Changes over the life span.Somatosensory & Motor Research,12, 29–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tawney, G. (1895). The perception of two points not the space-threshold.Psychological Review,2, 585–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vallbo, Å. B., Olausson, H., Wessberg, J., &Kakuda, N. (1995). Receptive field characteristics of tactile units with myelinated afferents in hairy skin of human subjects.Journal of Physiology,483, 783–795.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Boven, R. W., &Johnson, K. O. (1994a). The limit of tactile spatial resolution in humans: Grating orientation discrimination at the lip, tongue and finger.Neurology,44, 2361–2366.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Boven, R. W., &Johnson, K. O. (1994b). A psychophysical study of the mechanisms of sensory recovery following nerve injury in humans.Brain,117, 149–167.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vega-Bermudez, F., &Johnson, K. O. (2004). Fingertip skin conformance accounts, in part, for differences in tactile spatial acuity in young subjects, but not for the decline in spatial acuity with aging.Perception & Psychophysics,66, 60–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vierordt, K. (1870). Die Abhängigkeit der Ausbildung des Raumsinnes der Haut von den Beweglichkeit der Kerpertheile.Zeitschrift für Biologie,6, 53–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, E. H. (1996).E. H. Weber on the tactile senses (2nd ed.). Hove, U.K.: Erlbaum. (Original work published in 1834)

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, S. (1968). Intensive and extensive aspects of tactile sensitivity as a function of body part, sex and laterality. In D. R. Kenshalo (Ed.),The skin senses (pp. 195–222). Springfield, IL: C. C. Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheat, H. E., &Goodwin, A. W. (2000). Tactile discrimination of gaps by slowly adapting afferents: Effects of population parameters and anisotropy in the fingerpad.Journal of Neurophysiology,84, 1430–1444.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, T. S., Ho, R., &Ho, J. (1974). Influence of shape of receptor organ on the horizontal-vertical illusion in passive touch.Journal of Experimental Psychology,103, 414–419.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Indiana University, 47405, Bloomington, IN

    Gregory O. Gibson & James C. Craig

Authors
  1. Gregory O. Gibson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. James C. Craig
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gregory O. Gibson.

Additional information

This research was supported by the National Institutes of Health Grant No. DC 00095, National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gibson, G.O., Craig, J.C. Tactile spatial sensitivity and anisotropy. Perception & Psychophysics 67, 1061–1079 (2005). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193632

Download citation

  • Received: 03 June 2004

  • Accepted: 06 December 2004

  • Issue Date: August 2005

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193632

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Receptive Field
  • Lateral Orientation
  • Groove Width
  • Glabrous Skin
  • Oblique Orientation
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

Advertisement

Search

Navigation

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Books A-Z

Publish with us

  • Journal finder
  • Publish your research
  • Open access publishing

Products and services

  • Our products
  • Librarians
  • Societies
  • Partners and advertisers

Our imprints

  • Springer
  • Nature Portfolio
  • BMC
  • Palgrave Macmillan
  • Apress
  • Your US state privacy rights
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Help and support
  • Cancel contracts here

65.109.116.201

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2025 Springer Nature