Abstract
Participants were shown rapid sequences of three letters, flanked by digits, each rotated 0°, 90°, 180°, or 270° clockwise from upright. In Experiment 1, the participants tried to report the letter that matched the orientation of an arrow, presented either before (before task) or after (after task) the sequence. A third task (total task) required them to report all of the letters. Accuracy for individual letters was significantly better in the total task than in the before task, and better in the before task than in the after task, suggesting particular difficulty in binding orientation to identity. In Experiment 2, the participants were given letter probes and were asked to indicate the orientation of the probed letter. Although report was above chance, there were frequent illusory conjunctions. Since perception of orientation must depend on prior establishment of identity, our results suggest that orientation and identity may become unbound during processing and are held in parallel storage systems.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Appelle, S. (1972). Perception and discrimination as a function of stimulus orientation: The “oblique effect” in man and animals.Psychological Bulletin,78, 266–278.
Bavelier, D., &Potter, M. C. (1992). Visual and phonological codes in repetition blindness.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,18, 134–147.
Biederman, I., &Gerhardstein, P. C. (1993). Recognizing depthrotated objects: Evidence and conditions for three-dimensional viewpoint invariance.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,19, 1162–1182.
Corballis, M. C. (1988). Recognition of disoriented shapes.Psychological Review,95, 115–123.
Corballis, M. C., &Armstrong, C. (2007). Repetition blindness is orientation blind.Memory & Cognition,35, 372–380.
Corballis, M. C., Zbrodoff, N. J., Shetzer, L. I., &Butler, P. B. (1978). Decisions about identity and orientation of rotated letters and digits.Memory & Cognition,6, 98–107.
Fujinaga, N., Muramatsu, T., Ogano, M., &Kato, M. (2005). A three-year follow-up of “orientation agnosia.”Neuropsychologia,43, 1222–1226.
Harris, I. M., &Dux, P. E. (2005). Orientation-invariant object recognition: Evidence from repetition blindness.Cognition,95, 73–93.
Harris, I. M., Harris, J. A., &Caine, D. (2002). Object orientation agnosia: A failure to find the axis?Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,13, 800–812.
Jolicoeur, P., &Landau, M. J. (1984). Effects of orientation on the identification of simple visual patterns.Canadian Journal of Psychology,38, 80–93.
Kanwisher, N. (1987). Repetition blindness: Type recognition without token individuation.Cognition,37, 117–143.
Kanwisher, N., Yin, C., &Wojciulik, E. (1999). Repetition blindness for pictures: Evidence for the rapid computation of abstract visual descriptions. In V. Coltheart (Ed.),Fleeting memories: Cognition of brief visual stimuli (pp. 119–150). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Luck, S. J., &Vogel, E. K. (1997). The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions.Nature,390, 279–281.
Milner, A. D., &Goodale, M. A. (1995).The visual brain in action. New York: Oxford University Press.
Quiroga, R. Q., Reddy, L., Kreiman, G., &Fried, I. (2005). Invariant visual representation by single neurons in the human brain.Nature,435, 1102–1107.
Tarr, M. J., &Bülthoff, H. H. (1995). Is human object recognition better described by geon structural descriptions or by multiple views? Comment on Biederman and Gerhardstein (1993).Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,21, 1494–1505.
Tarr, M. J., &Pinker, S. (1989). Mental rotation and orientation dependence in shape recognition.Cognitive Psychology,21, 233–282.
Treisman, A. M. (1988). Features and objects: The fourteenth Bartlett memorial lecture.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,40A, 201–237.
Turnbull, O. H., Della Sala, S., &Beschin, N. (2002). Agnosia for object orientation: Naming and mental rotation evidence.Neurocase,8, 296–305.
Ungerleider, L. G., &Mishkin, M. (1982). Two cortical visual systems. In D. J. Ingle, R. J. W. Mansfield, & M. S. Goodale (Eds.),The analysis of visual behavior (pp. 549–586). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Valyear, K. F., Culham, J. C., Sharif, N., Westwood, D., &Goodale, M. A. (2006). A double dissociation between sensitivity to changes in object identity and object orientation in the ventral and dorsal visual streams: A human fMRI study.Neuropsychologia,44, 218–228.
Vinje, W. E., &Gallant, J. (2000). Sparse coding and decorrelation in primary visual cortex during natural vision.Science,287, 1273–1276.
Wheeler, M. E., &Treisman, A. M. (2002). Binding in short-term visual memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,131, 48–64.
Wilson, K. D., &Farah, M. J. (2003). When does the visual system use viewpoint-invariant representations during recognition?Cognitive Brain Research,16, 399–415.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Corballis, M.C., Armstrong, C. & Zhu, Z. Orientation unbound: Dissociation of identity and orientation under rapid serial visual presentation. Memory & Cognition 35, 1518–1525 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193620
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193620