We report a series of experiments using a pictorial analogy task designed to manipulate relational integration, interference resolution, and active maintenance simultaneously. The difficulty of the problems was varied in terms of the number of relations to be integrated, the need for interference resolution, and the duration of maintenance required to correctly solve the analogy. The participants showed decreases in performance when integrating multiple relations, as compared with a single relation, and when interference resolution was required in solving the analogy. When the participants were required to integrate multiple relations while simultaneously engaged in interference resolution, performance was worse, as compared with problems that incorporated either of these features alone. Maintenance of information across delays in the range of 1–4.5 sec led to greater decrements in visual memory, as compared with analogical reasoning. Misleading information caused interference when it had been necessarily attended to and maintained in working memory and, hence, had to be actively suppressed. However, sources of conflict within information that had not been attended to or encoded into working memory did not interfere with the ongoing controlled information processing required for relational integration. The findings provide evidence that relational integration and interference resolution depend on shared cognitive resources in working memory during analogical reasoning.
Christoff, K., Prabhakaran, V., Dorfman, J., Zhao, Z., Kroger, J. K., Holyoak, K. J., &Gabrieli, J. D. (2001). Rostrolateral prefrontal cortex involvement in relational integration during reasoning.NeuroImage,14, 1136–1149.
Gentner, D., &Toupin, C. (1986). Systematicity and surface similarity in the development of analogy.Cognitive Science,10, 277–300.
Glahn, D. C., Kim, J., Cohen, M. S., Poutanen, V. P., Therman, S., Bava, S., et al. (2002). Maintenance and manipulation in spatial working memory: Dissociations in the prefrontal cortex.NeuroImage,17, 201–213.
Halford, G. S. (1993).Children’s understanding: The development of mental models. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Halford, G. S., Wilson, W. H., &Phillips, S. (1998). Processing capacity defined by relational complexity: Implications for comparative, developmental, and cognitive psychology.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,21, 803–865.
Holyoak, K. J., &Koh, K. (1987). Surface and structural similarity in analogical transfer.Memory & Cognition,15, 332–340.
Kane, M. J., &Engle, R. W. (2003). The role of prefrontal cortex in working-memory capacity, executive attention, and general fluid intelligence: An individual-differences perspective.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,9, 637–671.
Kroger, J. K., Sabb, F. W., Fales, C. L., Bookheimer, S. Y., Cohen, M. S., &Holyoak, K. J. (2002). Recruitment of anterior dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in human reasoning: A parametric study of relational complexity.Cerebral Cortex,12, 477–485.
Miller, E. K., &Cohen, J. D. (2001). An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function.Annual Review of Neuroscience,24, 167–202.
Morrison, R. G., Holyoak, K. J., &Truong, B. (2001). Workingmemory modularity in analogical reasoning. In J. D. Moore & K. Stenning (Eds.),Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 663–668). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Morrison, R. G., Krawczyk, D. C., Holyoak, K. J., Hummel, J. E., Chow, T. W., Miller, B. L., &Knowlton, B. J. (2004). A neurocomputational model of analogical reasoning and its breakdown in frontotemporal lobar degeneration.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,16, 260–271.
Nee, D. E., & Jonides, J. (2004, November).Dissociating informationsuppression during encoding versus working memory. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Minneapolis.
Nee, D. E., & Jonides, J. (2007, May).Dissociable neural mechanisms of interference-resolution: Perception and memory. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the Cognitive Neuroscience Society, New York.
Prabhakaran, V., Smith, J. A., Desmond, J. E., Glover, G. H., &Gabrieli, J. D. (1997). Neural substrates of fluid reasoning: An fMRI study of neocortical activation during performance of the Raven’s Progressive Matrices Test.Cognitive Psychology,33, 43–63.
Raven, J. C. (1938).Progressive matrices: A perceptual test of intelligence, individual form. London: Lewis.
Richland, L. E., Morrison, R. G., &Holyoak, K. J. (2006). Children’s development of analogical reasoning: Insights from scene analogy problems.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,94, 249–271.
Robin, N., &Holyoak, K. J. (1995). Relational complexity and the functions of prefrontal cortex. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.),The cognitive neurosciences (pp. 987–997). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Ross, B. H. (1987). This is like that: The use of earlier problems and the separation of similarity effects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,13, 629–639.
Ross, B. H. (1989). Distinguishing types of superficial similarities: Different effects on the access and use of earlier problems.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 456–468.
Shimamura, A. P. (2000). The role of the prefrontal cortex in dynamic filtering.Psychobiology,28, 207–218.
Sternberg, R. J. (1977).Intelligence, information processing, and analogical reasoning: The componential analysis of human abilities. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Sternberg, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders’ method.Acta Psychologica,30, 276–315.
Viskontas, I. V., Morrison, R. G., Holyoak, K. J., Hummel, J. E., &Knowlton, B. J. (2004). Relational integration, inhibition and analogical reasoning in older adults.Psychology & Aging,19, 581–591.
Waltz, J. A., Knowlton, B. J., Holyoak, K. J., Boone, K. B., Mishkin, F. S., de Menezes Santos, M., et al. (1999). A system for relational reasoning in human prefrontal cortex.Psychological Science,10, 119–125.
Wharton, C. M., Grafman, J., Flitman, S. S., Hansen, E. K., Brauner, J., Marks, A., &Honda, M. (2000). Toward neuroanatomical models of analogy: A positron emission tomography study of analogical mapping.Cognitive Psychology,40, 173–197.
Preparation of the article was supported by a fellowship from the Kwanjeong Educational Foundation to S.C., by NIH Grants MH072613 to K.J.H., and MH06579 to T.D.C., and by a gift to the UCLA Foundation from the Staglin Music Festival for Mental Health.
About this article
Cite this article
Cho, S., Holyoak, K.J. & Cannon, T.D. Analogical reasoning in working memory: Resources shared among relational integration, interference resolution, and maintenance. Memory & Cognition 35, 1445–1455 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193614
- Work Memory
- Analogical Reasoning
- Relational Integration
- Interference Level
- Relevant Trait