Abstract
To examine the nature of the information that guides eye movements to previously read text during reading (regressions), we used a relatively novel technique to request a regression to a particular target word when the eyes reached a predefined location during sentence reading. A regression was to be directed to a close or a distant target when either the first or the second line of a complex two-line sentence was read. In addition, conditions were created that pitted effects of spatial and linguistic distance against each other. Initial regressions were more accurate when the target was spatially near, and effects of spatial distance dominated effects of verbal distance. Initial regressions rarely moved the eyes onto the target, however, and subsequent “corrective” regressions that homed in on the target were subject to general linguistic processing demands, being more accurate during firstline reading than during second-line reading. The results suggest that spatial and verbal memory guide regressions in reading. Initial regressions are primarily guided by fixation-centered spatial memory, and corrective regressions are primarily guided by linguistic knowledge.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Abrams, R. A., &Jonides, J. (1988). Programming saccadic eye movements.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,14, 428–443.
Baccino, T., &Pynte, J. (1994). Spatial coding and discourse models during text reading.Language & Cognitive Processes,9, 143–155.
Baddeley, A. (2003). Working memory: Looking back and looking forward.Nature Reviews Neuroscience,4, 829–839.
Ballard, D. H., Hayhoe, M. M., Pook, P. K., &Rao, R. P. N. (1997). Deictic codes for the embodiment of cognition.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,20, 723–767.
Christie, J. M., &Just, M. A. (1976). Remembering the location and content of sentences in a prose passage.Journal of Educational Psychology,68, 702–710.
Fischer, M. (1999). Memory for word locations in reading.Memory,7, 79–116.
Inhoff, A. W., Connine, C., &Radach, R. (2002). A contingent speech technique in eye movement research on reading.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,34, 471–480.
Inhoff, A. W., &Weger, U. W. (2005). Memory for word location during reading: Eye movements to previously read words are spatially selective but not precise.Memory & Cognition,33, 447–461.
Inhoff, A. W., Weger, U. W., &Radach, R. (2005). Sources of information for the programming of short- and long-range regressions during reading. In G. Underwood (Ed.),Cognitive processes in eye guidance (pp. 33–52) New York: Oxford University Press.
Kapoula, Z. (1985). Evidence for a range effect in the saccadic system.Vision Research,25, 1155–1157.
Kennedy, A. (1992). The spatial coding hypothesis. In K. Rayner (Ed.),Eye movements and visual cognition: Scene perception and reading (pp. 379–396). New York: Springer.
Kennedy, A., Brooks, R., Flynn, L.-A., &Prophet, C. (2003). The reader’s spatial codé. In J. Hyönä, R. Radach, & H. Deubel (Eds.),The mind’s eye: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research (pp. 193–212). Amsterdam: Elsevier, North-Holland.
Kennedy, A., &Murray, W. S. (1987). Spatial coordinates and reading: Comments on Monk (1985).Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,39A, 649–656.
Kolers, P. A. (1968). Foreword. In E. B. Huey (Ed.),The psychology and pedagogy of reading. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kucera, H., &Francis, W. N. (1967).Computational analysis of presentday American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
Miyake, A., Just, M. A., &Carpenter, P. A. (1994). Working memory constraints on the resolution of lexical ambiguity: Maintaining multiple interpretations in neutral contexts.Journal of Memory & Language,33, 175–202.
Pylyshyn, Z. [W.] (1989). The role of location indexes in spatial perception: A sketch of the FINST spatial-index model.Cognition,32, 65–97.
Pylyshyn, Z. W., &Storm, R. W. (1988). Tracking multiple independent targets: Evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism.Spatial Vision,3, 179–197.
Radach, R., &McConkie, G. W. (1998). Determinants of fixation position in words during reading. In G. Underwood (Ed.),Eye guidance in reading and scene perception (pp. 77–100). Oxford: Elsevier, North-Holland.
Rawson, K. A., &Miyake, A. (2002). Does relocating information in text depend on verbal or visuospatial abilities? An individual-differences analysis.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,9, 801–806.
Rayner, K., &Pollatsek, A. (1989).The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Vitu, F. (1993). The influence of the reading rhythm on the optimal landing position effect. In Géry d’Ydewalle & Johan Van Rensbergen (Eds.),Perception and cognition: Advances in eye movement research (pp. 181–192). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Vitu, F. (2005). Visual extraction processes and regressive saccades in reading. In G. Underwood (Ed.),Cognitive processes in eye guidance (pp. 1–32). New York: Oxford University Press.
Vitu, F., &McConkie, G. W. (2000). Regressive saccades and word perception in adult reading. In A. Kennedy, R. Radach, D. Heller, & J. Pynte (Eds.),Reading as a perceptual process (pp. 301–326). Oxford: Elsevier, North-Holland.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
This work was supported by NIH Grant HD043405 to A.W.I.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Weger, U.W., Inhoff, A.W. Long-range regressions to previously read words are guided by spatial and verbal memory. Memory & Cognition 35, 1293–1306 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193602
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193602