Abstract
Although research has documented that perceptual elaboration (e.g., imagery) can increase false memory, prior research has not ascertained whether such effects are due to the act of generation or simply from exposure to perceptual details. Two experiments explored this question using the eyewitness suggestibility paradigm. Experiment 1 compared the effect of generating descriptions of suggested items with the effects of reading elaborated versions of the items or the suggested items alone. Experiment 2 compared participants who generated descriptions to participants who read the same descriptions. Generating a description increased false memoryand increased accurate memory for the items’ actual source, relative to comparable control conditions. Generation also increased claims of having a (false) vivid recollection of the items in the event. Overall, the results suggest that conditions that require people to describe the appearance of objects that they do not remember are even more pernicious than conditions that involve exposure to such details.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Ackil, J. K., &Zaragoza, M. S. (1998). Memorial consequences of forced confabulation: Age differences in the susceptibility to false memories.Developmental Psychology,34, 1358–1372.
Brewer, W. F. (1988). Memory for randomly sampled autobiographical events. In U. Neisser & E. Winograd (Eds.),Remembering reconsidered: Ecological and traditional approaches to the study of memory (pp. 21–90). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Burns, D. J. (1990). The generation effect: A test between single- and multifactor theories.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 1060–1067.
Dent, H. R. (1982). The effects of interviewing strategies on the results of interviews with child witnesses. In A. Trankell (Ed.),Reconstructing the past: The role of psychologists in criminal trials (pp. 279–297). Deventer, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Dewhurst, S. A., &Hitch, G. J. (1999). Cognitive effort and recollective experience in recognition memory.Memory,7, 129–146.
Dobson, M., &Markham, R. (1993). Imagery ability and source monitoring: Implications for eyewitness memory.British Journal of Psychology,32, 111–118.
Drivdahl, S. B., &Zaragoza, M. S. (2001). The role of perceptual elaboration and individual differences in the creation of false memories for suggested events.Applied Cognitive Psychology,15, 265–281.
Gallo, D. A. (2004). Using recall to reduce false recognition: Diagnostic and disqualifying monitoring.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,30, 120–128.
Gardiner, J. M. (1988). Functional aspects of recollective experience.Memory & Cognition,16, 309–313.
Garry, M., Manning, C. G., Loftus, E. F., &Sherman, S. J. (1996). Imagination inflation: Imagining a childhood event inflates confidence that it occurred.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,3, 208–214.
Geghman, K. D., &Multhaup, K. S. (2004). How generation affects source memory.Memory & Cognition,32, 819–823.
Goff, L. M., &Roediger, H. L., III (1998). Imagination inflation for action events: Repeated imaginings lead to illusory recollections.Memory & Cognition,26, 20–33.
Gonsalves, B., Reber, P. J., Gitelman, D. R., Parrish, T. B., Mesulam, M.-M., &Paller, K. A. (2004). Neural evidence that vivid imagining can lead to false remembering.Psychological Science,15, 655–660.
Hicks, J. L., Marsh, R. L., &Ritschel, L. (2002). The role of recollection and partial information in source monitoring.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,28, 503–508.
Hirshman, E., &Bjork, R. A. (1988). The generation effect: Support for a two-factor theory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,14, 484–494.
Hoffman, H. G., Loftus, E. F., Greenmun, C. N., &Dashiell, R. L. (1992). The generation of misinformation. In F. Lösel, D. Bender, & T. Bliesener (Eds.),Psychology and law: International perspectives (pp. 292–301). Berlin: de Gruyter.
Hyman, I. E., &Pentland, J. (1996). The role of mental imagery in the creation of false childhood memories.Journal of Memory & Language,35, 101–117.
Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., &Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring.Psychological Bulletin,114, 3–28.
Johnson, M. K., &Raye, C. L. (1981). Reality monitoring.Psychological Review,88, 67–85.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983).Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference and consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lane, S. M., Mather, M., Villa, D., &Morita, S. K. (2001). How events are reviewed matters: Effects of varied focus on eyewitness suggestibility.Memory & Cognition,29, 940–947.
Lane, S. M., &Zaragoza, M. S. (1995). The recollective experience of cross-modality confusion errors.Memory & Cognition,23, 607–610.
Lindsay, D. S., Hagen, L., Read, J. D., Wade, K. A., &Garry, M. (2004). True photographs and false memories.Psychological Science,15, 149–154.
Marsh, R. L., &Hicks, J. L. (1998). Test formats change sourcemonitoring decision processes.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24, 1137–1151.
McCloskey, M., &Zaragoza, M. (1985). Misleading postevent information and memory for events: Arguments and evidence against memory impairment hypotheses.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,114, 3–18.
McDaniel, M. A., Wadill, P. J., &Einstein, G. O. (1988). A contextual account of the generation effect: A three-factor theory.Journal of Memory & Language,27, 521–536.
Mitchell, K. J., &Zaragoza, M. S. (2001). Contextual overlap and eyewitness suggestibility.Memory & Cognition,29, 616–626.
Mulligan, N. W. (2004). Generation and memory for contextual detail.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,30, 838–855.
Pickel, K. L. (2004). When a lie becomes the truth: The effects of self-generated misinformation on eyewitness memory.Memory,12, 14–26.
Schooler, J. W., Foster, R. A., &Loftus, E. F. (1988). Some deleterious consequences of the act of recollection.Memory & Cognition,16, 243–251.
Schreiber, T. A., &Sergent, S. D. (1998). The role of commitment in producing misinformation effects in eyewitness memory.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,5, 443–448.
Slamecka, N. J., &Graf, P. (1978). The generation effect: Delineation of a phenomenon.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,4, 592–604.
Stark, L. J., Perfect, T. J., &Newstead, S. (2005). When elaboration leads to appropriation: Unconscious plagiarism in a creative task.Memory,13, 561–573.
Taylor, S. E., Pham, L. B., Rivkin, I. D., &Armor, D. A. (1998). Harnessing the imagination: Mental simulation, self-regulation, and coping.American Psychologist,53, 429–439.
Thomas, A. Y., Bulevich, J. B., &Loftus, E. F. (2003). Exploring the role of repetition and sensory elaboration in the imagination inflation effect.Memory & Cognition,31, 630–640.
Tousignant, J. P., Hall, D., &Loftus, E. F. (1986). Discrepancy detection and vulnerability to misleading postevent information.Memory & Cognition,14, 329–338.
Tulving, E. (1985). Memory and consciousness.Canadian Psychology,26, 1–12.
Zaragoza, M. S., &Lane, S. M. (1994). Source misattributions and the suggestibility of eyewitness memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,20, 934–945.
Zaragoza, M. S., &Mitchell, K. M. (1996). Repeated suggestion and the creation of false memories.Psychological Science,7, 294–300.
Zaragoza, M. S., Payment, K. E., Ackil, J. K., Drivdahl, S. B., &Beck, M. (2001). Interviewing witnesses: Forced confabulation and confirmatory feedback increase false memories.Psychological Science,12, 473–477.
Zwaan, R. A., &Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory.Psychological Bulletin,123, 162–185.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lane, S.M., Zaragoza, M.S. A little elaboration goes a long way: The role of generation in eyewitness suggestibility. Memory & Cognition 35, 1255–1266 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193599
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193599