Abstract
In a lexical decision task (LDT) in which list composition is manipulated, a typical finding to date has been a slowdown for easy items (e.g., high-frequency words) but little speedup for hard items (e.g., low-frequency words) when they are mixed together. This asymmetric frequency-blocking effect contrasts with the symmetric pattern (both a speedup for hard items and a slowdown for easy items when they are mixed together) observed with the naming task. In the present study, we investigated the mechanism responsible for the asymmetric blocking effect in the LDT within a model of blocking effect proposed by Mozer, Kinoshita, and Davis (2003), termed theadaptation-to-the-statistics-of- the environment (ASE) model. Experiments 1A and 1B showed that when the same high- and low-frequency words were used, consistent with the existing literature, an asymmetric blocking effect was found in the LDT and a symmetric blocking effect was found in the naming task. Within the ASE model, a symmetric versus asymmetric blocking effect can be explained in terms of different asymptotic rates in subjective estimates of error probability. Experiments 2 and 3 tested and confirmed a prediction of the model based on this assumption that a speedup of hard items would be observed in an LDT with hard items whose subjective error probability asymptotes near zero (low-frequency words with high familiarity ratings that subjects could be certain were words). Implications of the model for task differences in reaction times are discussed.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Andrews, S. (1989). Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Activation or search?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 802–814.
Andrews, S., &Heathcote, A. (2001). Distinguishing common and task-specific processes in word identification: A matter of some moment?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,27, 514–544.
Balota, D. A., &Spieler, D. H. (1999). Word frequency, repetition, and lexicality effects in word recognition tasks: Beyond measures of central tendency.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,128, 32–55.
Chateau, D., &Lupker, S. J. (2001). Strategic effects in word naming: Examining the route-emphasis versus time-criterion accounts.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,29, 139–151.
Coltheart, M. (1981). The MRC psycholinguistic database.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,33A, 497–508.
Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J. T., &Besner, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Dornic (Ed.),Attention and performance VI (pp. 539–555). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Dorfman, D., &Glanzer, M. (1988). List composition effects in lexical decision and recognition memory.Journal of Memory & Language,27, 633–648.
Forster, K. I., &Forster, J. C. (2003). DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,35, 116–124.
Glanzer, M., &Ehrenreich, S. L. (1979). Structure and search of the internal lexicon.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,18, 381–398.
Gordon, B. (1983). Lexical access and lexical decision: Mechanisms of frequency sensitivity.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,22, 24–44.
Grainger, J., &Jacobs, A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model.Psychological Review,103, 518–565.
Kiger, J. I., &Glass, A. L. (1981). Context effects in sentence verification.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,7, 688–700.
Kčcera, H., &Francis, W. N. (1967).Computational analysis of presentday American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
Lupker, S. J., Brown, P., &Colombo, L. (1997). Strategic control in a naming task: Changing routes or changing deadlines?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 570–590.
Lupker, S. J., Kinoshita, S., Coltheart, M., &Taylor, T. (2003). Mixing costs and mixing benefits in naming words, pictures, and sums.Journal of Memory & Language,49, 556–575.
Meyer, A. S., Roelofs, A., &Levelt, W. J. M. (2003). Word length effects in object naming: The role of a response criterion.Journal of Memory & Language,48, 131–147.
Mozer, M. C., Colagrosso, M. D., &Huber, D. E. (2002). A rational analysis of cognitive control in a speeded discrimination task. In T. Dietterich, S. Becker, & Z. Ghahramani (Eds.),Advances in neural information processing systems 14 (pp. 51–57). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Mozer, M. C., Kinoshita, S., & Davis, C. (2003, November).Control and adaptation of the speed—accuracy tradeoff: A mathematical theory. Paper presented at the 44th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Vancouver.
Paap, K. R., Johansen, L. S., Chun, E., &Vonnahme, P. (2000). Neighborhood frequency does affect performance in the Reicher task: Encoding or decision?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,26, 1691–1720.
Perea, M., &Carreiras, M. (2003). Sequential effects in the lexical decision task: The role of the item-frequency of the previous trial.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,56A, 385–401.
Perea, M., Carreiras, M., &Grainger, J. (2004). Blocking by word frequency and neighborhood density in visual word recognition: A task-specific response criteria account.Memory & Cognition,32, 1090–1102.
Rastle, K., &Coltheart, M. (1999). Serial and strategic effects in reading aloud.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,25, 482–503.
Rastle, K., Harrington, J., &Coltheart, M. (2002). 358,534 nonwords: The ARC Nonword Database.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,55A, 1339–1362.
Rastle, K., Kinoshita, S., Lupker, S. J., &Coltheart, M. (2003). Cross-task strategic effects.Memory & Cognition,31, 867–876.
Ratcliff, R. (1978). A theory of memory retrieval.Psychological Review,85, 59–108.
Ratcliff, R., Gomez, P., &McKoon, G. (2004). A diffusion model account of the lexical decision task.Psychological Review,111, 159–182.
Stone, G. O., &Van Orden, G. C. (1993). Strategic control of processing in word recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,19, 744–774.
Strayer, D. L., &Kramer, A. F. (1994). Strategies and automaticity: I. Basic findings and conceptual framework.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,20, 318–341.
Taylor, T. E., &Lupker, S. J. (2001). Sequential effects in naming: A time-criterion account.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,27, 117–138.
Wagenmakers, E.-J., Steyvers, M., Raaijmakers, J. G. W., Shiffrin R. M., van Rijn, H., &Zeelenberg, R. (2004). A model for evidence accumulation in the lexical decision task.Cognitive Psychology,48, 332–367.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This study was supported by the Macquarie University Research Development grant to S.K.
Note—This article was accepted by the previous editorial team, when Colin M. MacLeod was Editor.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kinoshita, S., Mozer, M.C. How lexical decision is affected by recent experience: Symmetric versus asymmetric frequency-blocking effects. Memory & Cognition 34, 726–742 (2006). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193591
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193591