Abstract
In five experiments, we investigated college students’ use of base rate and case cue information in estimating likelihood. The participants reported that case cues were more important than base rates, except when the case cues were totally uninformative, and made more use of base rate information when the base rates were varied within subjects, rather than between subjects. Estimates were more Bayesian when base rate and case cue information was congruent, rather than contradictory. The nature of the “witness” in case cue information (animate or inanimate) did not affect the use of base rate and case cue information. Multiple trials with feedback led to more accurate estimates; however, this effect was not lasting. The results suggest that when base rate information is made salient by experience (multiple trials and within-subjects variation) or by other manipulations, base rate neglect is minimized.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bar-Hillel, M. (1990). Back to base rates. In R. M. Hogarth (Ed.),Insights in decision making: A tribute to Hillel J. Einhorn (pp. 200–216). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Birnbaum, M. (1983). Base rates in Bayesian inference: Signal detection analysis of the cab problem.American Journal of Psychology,96, 85–93.
Birnbaum, M., &Mellers, B. (1983). Bayesian inference: Combining base rates with opinions of sources who vary in credibility.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,45, 792–804.
Case, D. A., Fantino, E., &Goodie, A. S. (1999). Base-rate training without case cues reduces base-rate neglect.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,6, 319–327.
Christensen-Szalanski, J. J., &Beach, L. R. (1982). Experience and the base-rate fallacy.Organizational Behavior & Human Performance,29, 270–278.
Christensen-Szalanski, J. J., &Bushyhead, J. B. (1981). Physicians’ use of probabilistic information in a real clinical setting.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,7, 928–935.
Cohen, L. J. (1979). On the psychology of prediction: Whose is the fallacy?Cognition,7, 385–407.
Cohen, M. S. (1993). Three paradigms for viewing decision biases. In G. A. Klein, J. Orasanu, R. Calderwood, & C. E. Zsambok (Eds.),Decision making in action: Models and methods (pp. 36–50). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Doherty, M. E. (2003). Optimists, pessimists, and realists. In S. L. Schneider & J. Shanteau (Eds.),Emerging perspectives on judgment and decision research (pp. 643–679). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Donahoe, J. W., &Palmer, D. C. (1994).Learning and complex behavior. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Eddy, D. M. (1982). Probabilistic reasoning in clinical medicine: Problems and opportunities. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.),Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 249–267). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fantino, E., Kanevsky, I. G., &Charlton, S. (2005). Teaching pigeons to commit base-rate neglect.Psychological Science,16, 820–825.
Fantino, E., &Stolarz-Fantino, S. (2003). Context and its effect on transfer.Greek Economic Review,22, 11–26.
Fiedler, K. (2000). Beware of samples! A cognitive-ecological sampling approach to judgment biases.Psychological Review,107, 659–676.
Gigerenzer, G. (1998). Ecological intelligence: An adaptation for frequencies. In D. D. Cummins & C. Allen (Eds.),The evolution of mind (pp. 9–29). New York: Oxford University Press.
Gigerenzer, G., &Hoffrage, U. (1995). How to improve Bayesian reasoning without instruction: Frequency formats.Psychological Review,103, 684–704.
Gigerenzer, G., Hoffrage, U., &Ebert, A. (1998). AIDS counseling for low-risk clients.AIDS Care,10, 197–211.
Goodie, A. S., &Fantino, E. (1995). An experientially derived baserate error in humans.Psychological Science,6, 101–106.
Goodie, A. S., &Fantino, E. (1996). Learning to commit or avoid the base-rate error.Nature,380, 247–249.
Goodie, A. S., &Fantino, E. (1999a). Base rates versus sample accuracy: Competition for control in human matching to sample.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,71, 155–169.
Goodie, A. S., &Fantino, E. (1999b). What does and does not alleviate base-rate neglect under direct experience.Journal of Behavioral Decision Making,12, 307–335.
Hartl, J. A., &Fantino, E. (1996). Choice as a function of reinforcement ratios in delayed matching to sample.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,66, 11–27.
Hertwig, R., &Gigerenzer, G. (1999). The “conjunction fallacy” revisited: How intelligent inferences look like reasoning errors.Journal of Behavioral Decision Making,12, 275–305.
Jacobs, J. E., &Potenza, M. (1991). The use of judgment heuristics to make social and object decisions: A developmental perspective.Child Development,62, 166–178.
Johnson-Laird, P. N., Legrenzi, P., Girotto, V., Legrenzi, M., &Caverni, J.-P. (1999). Naive probability: A mental model theory of extensional reasoning.Psychological Review,106, 62–88.
Kahneman, D. (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality.American Psychologist,58, 697–720.
Kaye, D. H., &Koehler, J. J. (1991). Can jurors understand probabilistic evidence?Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A,154, 75–81.
Kaye, D. H., &Koehler, J. J. (2003). The misquantification of probative value.Law & Human Behavior,27, 645–659.
Kennedy, M. L., Willis, W. G., &Faust, D. (1997). The base-rate fallacy in school psychology.Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment,15, 292–307.
Koehler, J. J. (1996). The base rate fallacy reconsidered: Descriptive, normative, and methodological challenges.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,19, 1–53.
Leon, M., &Anderson, N. H. (1974). A ratio rule from integration theory applied to inference judgments.Journal of Experimental Psychology,102, 27–36.
Lindeman, S., Van den Brink, W., &Hoogstraten, J. (1988). Effect of feedback on base-rate utilization.Perceptual & Motor Skills,67, 343–350.
Macchi, L. (1995). Pragmatic aspects of the base-rate fallacy.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,48A, 188–207.
Macchi, L. (2000). Partitive formulation of information in probabilistic problems: Beyond heuristics and frequency format explanations.Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes,82, 217–236.
Peterson, C., &Beach, L. (1967). Man as an intuitive statistician.Psychological Bulletin,68, 29–46.
Shafir, E., &LeBoeuf, R. A. (2002). Rationality.Annual Review of Psychology,53, 491–517.
Stanovich, K. E. (1999).Who is rational? Studies of individual differences in reasoning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Stanovich, K. E., &West, R. F. (2000). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?Behavioral & Brain Sciences,23, 645–726.
Stolarz-Fantino, S., &Fantino, E. (2005). The rules we choose by.Behavioral Processes,69, 151–153.
Stolarz-Fantino, S., Fantino, E., Zizzo, D., &Wen, J. (2003). The conjunction effect: New evidence for robustness.American Journal of Psychology,116, 15–34.
Tversky, A., &Kahneman, D. (1982). Evidential impact of base rates. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.),Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 153–160). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ward, L. M. (1975). Heuristic use or information integration in the estimation of subjective likelihood?Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,6, 43–46.
Weber, E. U., Böckenholt, U., Hilton, D. J., &Wallace, B. (1993). Determinants of diagnostic hypothesis generation: Effects of information, base rates, and experience.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 1151–1164.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by NIMH Grant MH 57127 to the University of California, San Diego.
Note—This article was accepted by the previous editorial team, when Colin M. MacLeod was Editor.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stolarz-Fantino, S., Fantino, E. & Van Borst, N. Use of base rates and case cue information in making likelihood estimates. Memory & Cognition 34, 603–618 (2006). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193583
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193583