Abstract
Dennis and Ahn (2001) found that during contingency learning, initial evidence influences causal judgments more than does later evidence (a primacy effect), whereas López, Shanks, Almaraz, and Fernández (1998) found the opposite (a recency effect). We propose that in contingency learning, people use initial evidence to develop an anchoring hypothesis that tends to be underadjusted by later evidence, resulting in a primacy effect. Thus, factors interfering with initial hypothesis development, such as simultaneously learning too many contingencies, as in López et al., would reduce the primacy effect. Experiment 1 showed a primacy effect with learning contingencies involving only one outcome but no primacy effect with two outcomes. Experiment 2 demonstrated that the magnitude of the primacy effect correlated with participants’ verbal working memory capacity. It is concluded that a critical moderator for exhibition of the primacy effect is task complexity, presumably because it interferes with initial hypothesis development.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Catena, A., Maldonado, A., &Cándido, A. (1998). The effect of frequency of judgment and the type of trials on covariation learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 481–495.
Cedrus Corporation (1999). SuperLab Pro 1.75 [Computer program]. San Pedro, CA: Author.
Collins, D. J., &Shanks, D. R. (2002). Momentary and integrative response strategies in causal judgment.Memory & Cognition,30, 1138–1147.
Daneman, M., &Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,19, 450–466.
De Houwer, J., &Beckers, T. (2003). Secondary task difficulty modulates forward blocking in human contingency learning.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,56B, 345–357.
De Houwer, J., Beckers, T., &Glautier, S. (2002). Outcome and cue properties modulate blocking.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,55A, 965–985.
Dennis, M. J. (2004).Primacy in causal strength judgments: The effect of initial evidence for generative versus inhibitory relationships. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Yale University.
Dennis, M. J., &Ahn, W.-K. (2001). Primacy in causal strength judgments: The effect of initial evidence for generative versus inhibitory relationships.Memory & Cognition,29, 152–164.
Hogarth, R. M., &Einhorn, H. J. (1992). Order effects in belief updating: The belief-adjustment model.Cognitive Psychology,24, 1–55.
Kahneman, D., &Tversky, A. (1973). On the psychology of prediction.Psychology Review,80, 237–251.
López, F. J., Shanks, D. R., Almaraz, J., &Fernández, P. (1998). Effects of trial order on contingency judgments: A comparison of associative and probabilistic contrast accounts.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24, 672–694.
Matute, H., Vegas, S., &De Marez, P. J. (2002). Flexible use of recent information in causal and predictive judgments.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,28, 714–725.
Murdock, B. B. (1962). The serial position curve of free recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology,64, 482–488.
Rescorla, R. A., &Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.),Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory (pp. 64–99). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Shah, P., &Miyake, A. (1996). The separability of working memory resources for spatial thinking and language processing: An individual differences approach.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,125, 4–27.
Slovic, P., &Lichtenstein, S. (1971). Comparison of Bayesian and regression approaches to the study of information processing in judgment.Organizational Behavior & Human Performance,6, 649–744.
Waldmann, M. R., &Holyoak, K. J. (1992). Predictive and diagnostic learning within causal models: Asymmetries in cue competition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,121, 222–236.
Waldmann, M. R., &Walker, J. M. (2005). Competence and performance in causal learning.Learning & Behavior,33, 211–229.
Ward, G. (2002). A recency-based account of the list length effect in free recall.Memory & Cognition,30, 885–892.
Yates, J. F., &Curley, S. P. (1986). Contingency judgment: Primacy effects and attention decrement.Acta Psychologica,62, 293–302.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Support for this research was provided in part by National Institutes of Health Grant R01-MH57737 to W.-K.A.
Note—This article was accepted by the previous editorial team, when Colin M. MacLeod was Editor.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Marsh, J.K., Ahn, WK. Order effects in contingency learning: The role of task complexity. Memory & Cognition 34, 568–576 (2006). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193580
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193580