Abstract
The objective of the study was to characterize the Pacinian representation of stimulus waveform. Subjects were presented with pairs of high-frequency vibrotactile stimuli that varied in intensity and/or frequency content and madesame—different judgments under conditions of low-frequency adaptation designed to minimize the contribution of the RA system. We wished to infer the nature of the information conveyed by the Pacinian system about the stimuli from measured sensitivity (d′) to stimulus differences. We first tested the hypothesis that the Pacinian system conveys only intensive information about vibratory stimuli and found that intensive cues could not account for much of the variance in the discrimination data. We then proposed a model characterizing the Pacinian-mediated representation of an arbitrary stimulus as a pattern of activation in a set of frequency-tuned minichannels. The model was shown to predict the discriminability of the stimulus pairs presented in the psychophysical experiments. Furthermore, the model parameters, optimized to fit the discrimination data, were compatible with analogous values obtained in other experimental contexts. One of the assumptions underlying the model is that information about individual spectral components is conveyed in parallel and quasi-independently. By simulating the response of a population of Pacinian afferents to a polyharmonic stimulus, we demonstrated that such a population can simultaneously convey information about multiple frequency components, despite having a homogeneous spectral profile.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bensmaïa, S. J. (2002). A transduction model of the Meissner corpuscle.Mathematical Biosciences,176, 203–217.
Bensmaïa, S. J., &Hollins, M. (2000). Complex tactile waveform discrimination.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,108, 1236–1245.
Bensmaïa, S. J., &Hollins, M. (2003). The vibrations of texture.Somatosensory & Motor Research,20, 33–43.
Bolanowski, S. J., Jr.,Gescheider, G. A., Verrillo, R. T., &Checkosky, C. M. (1988). Four channels mediate the mechanical aspects of touch.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,84, 1680–1694.
Bolanowski, S. J., Jr., &Zwislocki, J. J. (1984). Intensity and frequency characteristics of Pacinian corpuscles: I. Action potentials.Journal of Neurophysiology,51, 793–811.
Dai, H., Versfeld, N. J., &Green, D. M. (1996). The optimum decision rules in the same—different paradigm.Perception & Psychophysics,58, 1–9.
DeValois, R. L., &DeValois, K. K. (1988).Spatial vision. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ekman, G. (1956). Discriminal sensitivity on the subjective continuum.Acta Psychologica,12, 233–243.
Ferrington, D. G., &Rowe, M. (1980). Differential contributions to coding of cutaneous vibratory information by cortical somatosensory areas I and II.Journal of Neurophysiology,43, 310–331.
Formby, C., Morgan, L. N., Forrest, T. G., &Raney, J. J. (1992). The role of frequency selectivity in measures of auditory vibrotactile resolution.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,91, 293–305.
Franzén, O. (1969). The dependence of vibrotactile threshold and magnitude functions on stimulation frequency and signal level: A perceptual and neural comparison.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology,10, 289–298.
Franzén, O., &Nordmark, J. (1975). Vibrotactile frequency discrimination.Perception & Psychophysics,17, 480–484.
Freeman, A. W., &Johnson, K. O. (1982a). Cutaneous mechanoreceptors in macaque monkey: Temporal discharge patterns evoked by vibration, and a receptor model.Journal of Physiology,323, 21–41.
Freeman A. W., &Johnson, K. O. (1982b). A model accounting for effects of vibratory amplitude on responses of cutaneous mechanoreceptors in macaque monkey.Journal of Neurophysiology,323, 43–64.
Gescheider, G. A., &Verrillo, R. T. (1979). Vibrotactile frequency characteristics as determined by adaptation and masking procedures. In D. Kenshalo (Ed.),Sensory functions of the skin of humans (pp. 183–206). New York: Plenum.
Gescheider, G. A., &Wright, J. H. (1968). Effects of sensory adaptation on the form of the psychophysical magnitude function for cutaneous vibration.Journal of Experimental Psychology,77, 308–313.
Gescheider, G. A., &Wright, J. H. (1969). Effects of vibrotactile adaptation on the perception of stimuli of varied intensity.Journal of Experimental Psychology,80, 449–453.
Goff, G. D. (1967). Differential discrimination of frequency of cutaneous mechanical vibration.Journal of Experimental Psychology,74, 294–299.
Hollins, M., Goble, A. K., Whitsel, B. L., &Tommerdahl, M. (1990). Time course and action spectrum of vibrotactile adaptation.Somatosensory & Motor Research,7, 205–221.
Horch, K. (1991). Coding of vibrotactile stimulus frequency by Pacinian corpuscle afferents.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,89, 2827–2836.
Hyvärinen, J., Sakata, H., Talbot, W. H., &Mountcastle, V. B. (1968). Neuronal coding by cortical cells of frequency of oscillating peripheral stimuli.Science,162, 1130–1132.
Johnson, K. O. (2001). The roles and functions of cutaneous mechanoreceptors.Current Opinions in Neurobiology,11, 455–461.
Lamoré, P. J. J., Muijser, H., &Keemink, C. J. (1986). Envelope detection of amplitude-modulated high-frequency sinusoidal signals by skin mechanoreceptors.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,79, 1082–1085.
LaMotte, R. H., &Mountcastle, V. B. (1975). Capacities of humans and monkeys to discriminate vibratory stimuli of different frequency and amplitude: A correlation between neural events and psychological measurements.Journal of Neurophysiology,38, 539–559.
Looft, F. J. (1996). Responses of monkey glabrous skin mechanoreceptors to random noise sequences: II. Dynamic stimulus state analysis.Somatosensory & Motor Research,13, 11–28.
Macmillan, N. A., &Creelman, C. D. (1991).Detection theory: A user’s guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Makous, J. C., Friedman, R. M., &Vierck, C. J., Jr. (1995). A critical band filter in touch.Journal of Neuroscience,15, 2808–2818.
Marks, L. E. (1979). Summation of vibrotactile intensity: An analog to auditory critical bands?Sensory Processes,3, 188–203.
Moore, B. C., &Patterson, R. D. (1986).Auditory frequency selectivity. New York: Plenum.
Morley, J. W., Archer, J. S., Ferrington, D. G., Rowe, M. J., &Turman, A. B. (1990). Neural coding of complex tactile vibration. In M. Rowe & L. Aitkin (Eds.),Information processing in mammalian auditory and tactile systems (pp. 127–140). New York: Wiley-Liss.
Mountcastle, V. B., Steinmetz, M. A., &Romo, R. (1990). Frequency discrimination in the sense of flutter: Psychophysical measurements correlated with postcentral events in behaving monkeys.Journal of Neuroscience,10, 3032–3044.
Mountcastle, V. B., Talbot, W. H., Darian-Smith I., &Kornhuber, H. H. (1967). Neural basis of the sense of flutter-vibration.Science,155, 597–600.
Mountcastle, V. B., Talbot, W. H., Sakata, H., &Hyvärinen, J. (1969). Cortical neuronal mechanisms in flutter-vibration studied in unanesthetized monkeys: Neuronal periodicity and frequency discrimination.Journal of Neurophysiology,32, 452–483.
Noreen, D. L. (1981). Optimal decision rules for common psychophysical paradigms. In S. Grossberg (Ed.),Mathematical psychology and psychophysiology (pp. 237–280). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Ochoa, J., &Torebjörk, E. (1983). Sensations evoked by intraneural microstimulation of single mechanoreceptor units innervating the human hand.Journal of Physiology,342, 633–654.
Rothenberg, M., Verrillo, R. T., Zahorian, S. A., Brachman, M. L., &Bolanowski, S. J., Jr. (1977). Vibrotactile frequency for encoding a speech parameter.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,62, 1003–1012.
Slavík, P., &Bell, J. (1995). A mechanoreceptor model for rapidly and slowly adapting afferents subjected to periodic vibratory stimuli.Mathematical Biosciences,130, 1–23.
Sorkin, R. D. (1962). Extensions of the theory of signal detectability to matching procedures in psychoacoustics.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,34, 1745–1751.
Stevens, S. S. (1968). Tactile vibration: Change of exponent with frequency.Perception & Psychophysics,3, 223–228.
Talbot, W. H., Darian-Smith, I., Kornhuber, H. H., &Mountcastle, V. B. (1968). The sense of flutter-vibration: Comparison of the human capacity with response patterns of mechanoreceptive afferents from the monkey hand.Journal of Neurophysiology,31, 301–334.
Verrillo, R. T. (1966). Vibrotactile sensitivity and the frequency response of the Pacinian corpuscle.Psychonomic Science,4, 135–136.
Verrillo, R. T. (1968). A duplex mechanism of mechanoreception. In D. Kenshalo (Ed.),The skin senses (pp. 139–159). Springfield, IL: Thomas.
Verrillo, R. T., Fraioli, A. J., &Smith, R. L. (1969). Sensation magnitude of vibrotactile stimuli.Perception & Psychophysics,6, 366–372.
Verrillo, R. T., &Gescheider, G. A. (1977). Effect of prior stimulation on vibrotactile thresholds.Sensory Processes,1, 292–300.
Weisenberger, J. (1986). Sensitivity to amplitude-modulated vibrotactile signals.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,80, 1707–1715.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work was supported by the Cognitive Science Program of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
BensmaÏa, S., Hollins, M. & Yau, J. Vibrotactile intensity and frequency information in the Pacinian system: A psychophysical model. Perception & Psychophysics 67, 828–841 (2005). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193536
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193536