Abstract
Current theorizing suggests that critical lures in the Deese/Roediger-McDermott (DRM) procedure are often falsely remembered because they have received considerable relational processing (e.g., spreading activation or encoding of gist information). We used a repeated-testing paradigm to assess the amount of item-specific and relational processing given to the list items and the critical lures. Research has shown that items receiving itemspecific processing are more likely to be recovered across successive tests. They are also output more slowly but more steadily throughout the recall period. In two experiments, we manipulated the processing performed on list items and then used item gains and cumulative recall curves to assess the amount of item-specific and relational information encoded for both list items and lures. The results suggest that increasing the relational processing of list items increased item-specific processing of lures, whereas increasing item-specific processing of list items decreased item-specific processing of lures. We conclude that critical lures are typically rich in item-specific information, relative to list items.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Arndt, J., &Reder, L. M. (2003). The effect of distinctive visual information on false recognition.Journal of Memory & Language,48, 1–15.
Balota, D. A., &Lorch, R. F., Jr. (1986). Depth of automatic spreading activation: Mediated priming effects in pronunciation but not in lexical decision.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,12, 336–345.
Benjamin, A. S. (2001). On the dual effects of repetition on false recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,27, 941–947.
Blaxton, T. A. (1989). Investigating dissociations among memory measures: Support for a transfer-appropriate processing framework.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 657–668.
Bousfield, W. A., &Sedgewick, C. H. W. (1944). An analysis of restricted associative responses.Journal of General Psychology,30, 149–165.
Brainerd, C. J., &Reyna, V. F. (1993). Memory independence and memory interference in cognitive development.Psychological Review,100, 42–67.
Brainerd, C. J., &Reyna, V. F. (1998). Fuzzy-trace theory and children’s false memories.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,71, 81–129.
Burns, D. J. (1993). Item gains and losses during hypermnesic recall: Implications for the item-specific-relational information distinction.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 163–173.
Burns, D. J. (2006). Assessing distinctiveness: Measures of item-specific and relational processing. In R. R. Hunt & J. B. Worthen (Eds.),Distinctiveness and memory (pp. 109–130). New York: Oxford University Press.
Burns, D. J., &Gold, D. E. (1999). An analysis of item gains and losses in retroactive interference.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,25, 978–985.
Burns, D. J., &Hebert, T. (2005). Using cumulative-recall curves to assess the extent of relational and item-specific processing.Memory,13, 189–199.
Burns, D. J., Martens, N. J., Bertoni, A. A., Sweeney, E. J., &Lividini, M. D. (2006). An item gains and losses analysis of false memories suggests critical items receive more item-specific processing than list items.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,32, 277–289.
Burns, D. J., &Schoff, K. M. (1998). Slow and steady often ties the race: Effects of item-specific and relational processing on cumulative recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24, 1041–1051.
Deese, J. (1959). On the prediction of occurrence of particular verbal intrusions in immediate recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology,58, 17–22.
Dodson, C. S., &Schacter, D. L. (2001). “If I had said it I would have remembered it”: Reducing false memories with a distinctiveness heuristic.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,8, 155–161.
Einstein, G. O., &Hunt, R. R. (1980). Levels of processing and organization: Additive effects of individual item and relational processing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,6, 588–598.
Engelkamp, J., &Seiler, K. H. (2003). Gains and losses in action memory.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,56A, 829–848.
Gallo, D. A., &Roediger, H. L., III (2002). Variability among word lists in eliciting memory illusions: Evidence for associative activation and monitoring.Journal of Memory & Language,47, 469–497.
Hancock, T. W., Hicks, J. L., Marsh, R. L., &Ritschel, L. (2003). Measuring the activation level of critical lures in the Deese-Roediger-McDermott paradigm.American Journal of Psychology,116, 1–14.
Hege, A. C. G., &Dodson, C. S. (2004). Why distinctive information reduces false memories: Evidence for both impoverished relationalencoding and distinctiveness heuristic accounts.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,30, 787–795.
Herrmann, D. J., &Chaffin, R. J. S. (1976). Number of available associations and rate of association for categories in semantic memory.Journal of General Psychology,95, 227–231.
Herrmann, D. J., &Murray, D. J. (1979). The role of category size in continuous recall from semantic memory.Journal of General Psychology,101, 205–218.
Hicks, J. L., &Starns, J. J. (2005). False memories lack perceptual detail: Evidence from implicit word-stem completion and perceptual identification tests.Journal of Memory & Language,52, 309–321.
Hodge, M. H., &Otani, H. (1996). Beyond category sorting and pleasantness rating: Inducing relational and item-specific processing.Memory & Cognition,24, 110–115.
Hunt, R. R. (2003). Two contributions of distinctive processing to accurate memory.Journal of Memory & Language,48, 811–825.
Hunt, R. R., &Einstein, G. O. (1981). Relational and item-specific information in memory.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,20, 497–514.
Hunt, R. R., &McDaniel, M. A. (1993). The enigma of organization and distinctiveness.Journal of Memory & Language,32, 421–445.
Hunt, R. R., &Mitchell, D. B. (1982). Independent effects of semantic and nonsemantic distinctiveness.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,8, 81–87.
Hunt, R. R., &Toth, J. P. (1990). Perceptual identification, fragment completion, and free recall: Concepts and data.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 282–290.
Israel, L., &Schacter, D. L. (1997). Pictorial encoding reduces false recognition of semantic associates.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,4, 577–581.
Johnson, D. M., Johnson, R. C., &Mark, A. L. (1951). A mathematical analysis of verbal fluency.Journal of General Psychology,44, 121–128.
Kaplan, I. T., Carvellas, T., &Metlay, W. (1969). Searching for words in letter sets of varying size.Journal of Experimental Psychology,82, 377–380.
Klein, S. B., Loftus, J., Kihlstrom, J. F., &Aseron, R. (1989). Effects of item-specific and relational information on hypermnesic recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 1192–1197.
Klein, S. B., Loftus, J., &Schell, T. (1994). Repeated testing: A technique for assessing the roles of elaborative and organizational processing in the representation of social knowledge.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,66, 830–839.
Mather, M., Henkel, L. A., &Johnson, M. K. (1997). Evaluating characteristics of false memories: Remember/know judgments and memory characteristics questionnaire compared.Memory & Cognition,25, 826–837.
McCabe, D. P., Presmanes, A. G., Robertson, C. L., &Smith, A. D. (2004). Item-specific processing reduces false memories.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,11, 1074–1079.
McDaniel, M. A., Moore, B. A., &Whiteman, H. L. (1998). Dynamic changes in hypermnesia across early and late tests: A relational/itemspecific account.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24, 173–185.
McDermott, K. B. (1996). The persistence of false memories in list recall.Journal of Memory & Language,35, 212–230.
McDermott, K. B., &Watson, J. M. (2001). The rise and fall of false recall: The impact of presentation duration.Journal of Memory & Language,45, 160–176.
McEvoy, C. L., Nelson, D. L., &Komatsu, T. (1999). What is the connection between true and false memories? The differential roles of interitem associations in recall and recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,25, 1177–1194.
Mulligan, N. W. (2000). Perceptual interference at encoding enhances item-specific encoding and disrupts relational encoding: Evidence from multiple recall tests.Memory & Cognition,28, 539–546.
Mulligan, N. W. (2001). Generation and hypermnesia.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,27, 436–450.
Mulligan, N. W. (2002). The emergence of item-specific encoding effects in between-subjects designs: Perceptual interference and multiple recall tests.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,9, 375–382.
Mulligan, N. W., &Duke, M. D. (2002). Positive and negative generation effects, hypermnesia, and total recall time.Memory & Cognition,30, 1044–1053.
Norman, K. A., &Schacter, D. L. (1997). False recognition in younger and older adults: Exploring the characteristics of illusory memories.Memory & Cognition,25, 838–848.
Payne, D. G., Elie, C. J., Blackwell, J. M., &Neuschatz, J. S. (1996). Memory illusions: Recalling, recognizing, and recollecting events that never occurred.Journal of Memory & Language,35, 261–285.
Payne, D. G., Lampinen, J. M., & Cordero, M. L. (1996, November).Remembrances of things not passed: Further evidence concerning false memories. Paper presented at the 37th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Chicago.
Pérez-Mata, M. N., Read, J. D., &Diges, M. (2002). Effects of divided attention and word concreteness on correct recall and false memory reports.Memory,10, 161–177.
Rajaram, S. (1993). Remembering and knowing: Two means of access to the personal past.Memory & Cognition,21, 89–102.
Read, J. D. (1996). From a passing thought to a false memory in 2 minutes: Confusing real and illusory events.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,3, 105–111.
Reyna, V. F., &Brainerd, C. J. (1995). Fuzzy-trace theory: An interim synthesis.Learning & Individual Differences,7, 1–75.
Robinson, K. J., &Roediger, H. L., III (1997). Associative processes in false recall and false recognition.Psychological Science,8, 231–237.
Roediger, H. L., III, &McDermott, K. B. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 803–814.
Roediger, H. L., III,McDermott, K. B., &Robinson, K. J. (1998). Role of associative processes in creating false memories. In M. A. Conway, S. E. Gathercole, & C. Cornoldi (Eds.),Theories of memory II (pp. 187–245). Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
Roediger, H. L., III,Stellon, C. C., &Tulving, E. (1977). Inhibition from part-list cues and rate of recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,3, 174–188.
Roediger, H. L., III,Watson, J. M., McDermott, K. B., &Gallo, D. A. (2001). Factors that determine false recall: A multiple regression analysis.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,8, 385–407.
Schacter, D. L., Cendan, D. L., Dodson, C. S., &Clifford, E. R. (2001). Retrieval conditions and false recognition: Testing the distinctiveness heuristic.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,8, 827–833.
Schacter, D. L., Israel, L., &Racine, C. (1999). Suppressing false recognition in younger and older adults: The distinctiveness heuristic.Journal of Memory & Language,40, 1–24.
Smith, R. E., &Hunt, R. R. (2000). The effects of distinctiveness require reinstatement of organization: The importance of intentional memory instructions.Journal of Memory & Language,43, 431–446.
Thapar, A., &McDermott, K. B. (2001). False recall and false recognition induced by presentation of associated words: Effects of retention interval and level of processing.Memory & Cognition,29, 424–432.
Toglia, M. P., Neuschatz, J. S., &Goodwin, K. A. (1999). Recall accuracy and illusory memories: When more is less.Memory,7, 233–256.
Tse, C., Neely, J. H. (2005). Assessing activation without source monitoring in the DRM false memory paradigm.Journal of Memory & Language,53, 532–550.
Tussing, A. A., &Greene, R. L. (1997). False recognition of associates: How robust is the effect?Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,4, 572–576.
Tussing, A. A., &Greene, R. L. (1999). Differential effects of repetition on true and false recognition.Journal of Memory & Language,40, 520–533.
Watson, J. M., Balota, D. A., &Roediger, H. L., III (2003). Creating false memories with hybrid lists of semantic and phonological associates: Over-additive false memories produced by converging associative networks.Journal of Memory & Language,49, 95–118.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by a faculty research grant to D.B. from Union College.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Burns, D.J., Jenkins, C.L. & Dean, E.E. Falsely recalled items are rich in item-specific information. Memory & Cognition 35, 1630–1640 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193497
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193497