Three experiments are reported in which a total of 182 old and 193 young adults recalled sequences of digits presented visually in silence or accompanied by office noise. In each experiment, an effect of irrelevant sound was found—that is, a reduction of serial recall due to auditory distraction. Old adults exhibited poorer serial recall than did young adults, but the irrelevant-sound effect was equivalent in both age groups. This was true even though the sound level of the irrelevant sound was adjusted to each individual’s hearing capability, and the effect remained whether or not the difficulty of the serial recall task was equated across age groups. These results are problematic for the inhibitory deficit theory of cognitive aging, which predicts that old adults should be more susceptible to auditory distraction than are young adults.
Baddeley, A. D. (2000). The phonological loop and irrelevant speech effect: Some comments on Neath (2000).Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 544–549.
Baddeley, A. [D.], &Larsen, J. D. (2003). The disruption of STM: A response to our commentators.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,56A, 1301–1306.
Baddeley, A. [D.], &Salamé, P. (1986). The unattended speech effect: Perception or memory?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,12, 525–529.
Barr, R. A., &Giambra, L. M. (1990). Age-related decrement in auditory selective attention.Psychology & Aging,5, 597–599.
Bayen, U. J., &Murnane, K. (1996). Aging and the use of perceptual and temporal information in source memory tasks.Psychology & Aging,11, 293–303.
Beaman, C. P. (2005). Irrelevant sound effects amongst younger and older adults: Objective findings and subjective insights.European Journal of Cognitive Psychology,17, 241–265.
Beaman, C. P., &Jones, D. M. (1997). Role of serial order in the irrelevant speech effect: Tests of the changing-state hypothesis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 459–471.
Beaman, C. P., &Jones, D. M. (1998). Irrelevant sound disrupts order information in free recall as in serial recall.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,51A, 615–636.
Belleville, S., Rouleau, N., Van der Linden, M., &Collette, F. (2003). Effect of manipulation and irrelevant noise on working memory capacity of patients with Alzheimer’s dementia.Neuropsychology,17, 69–81.
Buchner, A., &Erdfelder, E. (2005). Word frequency of irrelevant speech distractors affects serial recall.Memory & Cognition,33, 86–97.
Buchner, A., Irmen, L., &Erdfelder, E. (1996). On the irrelevance of semantic information for the “irrelevant speech” effect.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,49A, 765–779.
Buchner, A., &Mayr, S. (2004). Auditory negative priming in younger and older adults.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,57A, 769–787.
Buchner, A., Mehl, B., Rothermund, K., &Wentura, D. (2006). Artificially induced valence of distractor words increases the effects of irrelevant speech on serial recall.Memory & Cognition,34, 1055–1062.
Buchner, A., Rothermund, K., Wentura, D., &Mehl, B. (2004). Valence of distractor words increases the effects of irrelevant speech on serial recall.Memory & Cognition,32, 722–731.
Burke, D. M. (1997). Language, aging, and inhibitory deficits: Evaluation of a theory.Journals of Gerontology,52B, P254-P264.
Carlson, M. C., Hasher, L., Connelly, S., &Zacks, R. T. (1995). Aging, distraction, and the benefits of predictable location.Psychology & Aging,10, 427–436.
Chao, L. L., &Knight, R. T. (1997). Prefrontal deficits in attention and inhibitory control with aging.Cerebral Cortex,7, 63–69.
Cohen, J. (1988).Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (Rev. ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Colle, H. A. (1980). Auditory encoding in visual short-term recall: Effects of noise intensity and spatial location.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,19, 722–735.
Connelly, S. L., &Hasher, L. (1993). Aging and the inhibition of spatial location.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,19, 1238–1250.
Connelly, S. L., Hasher, L., &Zacks, R. T. (1991). Age and reading: The impact of distraction.Psychology & Aging,6, 533–541.
Cowan, N. (1995).Attention and memory: An integrated framework. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Clarendon Press.
Duchek, J. M., Balota, D. A., &Thessing, V. C. (1998). Inhibition of visual and conceptual information during reading in healthy aging and Alzheimer’s disease.Aging, Neuropsychology, & Cognition,5, 169–181.
Dywan, J., &Murphy, W. E. (1996). Aging and inhibitory control in text comprehension.Psychology & Aging,11, 199–206.
Ellermeier, W., &Hellbrück, J. (1998). Is level irrelevant in “irrelevant speech”? Effects of loudness, signal-to-noise ratio, and binaural unmasking.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 1406–1414.
Elliott, E. M. (2002). The irrelevant-speech effect and children: Theoretical implications of developmental change.Memory & Cognition,30, 478–487.
Elliott, E. M., &Cowan, N. (2005). Coherence of the irrelevant-sound effect: Individual profiles of short-term memory and susceptibility to task-irrelevant materials.Memory & Cognition,33, 664–675.
Erdfelder, E., Faul, F., &Buchner, A. (1996). GPOWER: A general power analysis program.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,28, 1–11.
Fozard, J. L., &Gordon-Salant, S. (2001). Changes in vision and hearing with aging. In J. E. Birren & K. W. Schaie (Eds.),Handbook of the psychology of aging (5th ed., pp. 241–266). San Diego: Academic Press.
Gamboz, N., Russo, R., &Fox, E. (2002). Age differences and the identity negative priming effect: An updated meta-analysis.Psychology & Aging,17, 525–530.
Gisselgård, J., Petersson, K. M., Baddeley, A., &Ingvar, M. (2003). The irrelevant speech effect: A PET study.Neuropsychologi,41, 1899–1911.
Hasher, L., Tonev, S. T., Lustig, C., &Zacks, R. (2001). Inhibitory control, environmental support, and self-initiated processing in aging. In M. Naveh-Benjamin, M. Moscovitch, & H. L. Roediger III (Eds.),Perspectives on human memory and cognitive aging: Essays in honour of Fergus Craik (pp. 286–297). Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
Hasher, L., &Zacks, R. T. (1988). Working memory, comprehension, and aging: A review and a new view. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 22, pp. 193–225). San Diego: Academic Press.
Hasher, L., Zacks, R. T., &May, C. P. (1999). Inhibitory control, circadian arousal, and age. In D. Gopher & A. Koriat (Eds.),Attention and performance XVII: Cognitive regulation of performance. Interaction of theory and application (pp. 653–675). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Holm, S. (1979). A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure.Scandinavian Journal of Statistics,6, 65–70.
Hughes, R. W., &Jones, D. M. (2003). A negative order-repetition priming effect: Inhibition of order in unattended auditory sequences?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,29, 199–218.
Jones, D. M., &Macken, W. J. (1993). Irrelevant tones produce an irrelevant speech effect: Implications for phonological coding in working memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 369–381.
Jones, D. M., &Macken, W. J. (1995). Phonological similarity in the irrelevant speech effect: Within- or between-stream similarity?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 103–133.
Jones, D. M., Macken, W. J., &Murray, A. C. (1993). Disruption of visual short-term memory by changing-state auditory stimuli: The role of segmentation.Memory & Cognition,21, 318–328.
Jones, D. [M.], Madden, C., &Miles, C. (1992). Privileged access by irrelevant speech to short-term memory: The role of changing state.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,44A, 645–669.
Langley, L. K., Overmier, J. B., Knopman, D. S., &Prod’Homme, M. M. (1998). Inhibition and habituation: Preserved mechanisms of attentional selection in aging and Alzheimer’s disease.Neuropsychology,12, 353–366.
Li, K. Z. H., Hasher, L., Jonas, D., Rahhal, T. A., &May, C. P. (1998). Distractibility, circadian arousal, and aging: A boundary condition?Psychology & Aging,13, 574–583.
Lindenberger, U., &Baltes, P. B. (1994). Sensory functioning and intelligence in old age: A strong connection.Psychology & Aging,9, 339–355.
Lindenberger, U., Scherer, H., &Baltes, P. B. (2001). The strong connection between sensory and cognitive performance in old age: Not due to sensory acuity reductions operating during cognitive assessment.Psychology & Aging,16, 196–205.
Lustig, C., &Hasher, L. (2001). Interference. In G. Maddox (Ed.),Encyclopedia of aging (3rd ed., pp. 553–555). New York: Springer.
Lustig, C., Hasher, L., &Tonev, S. T. (2001). Inhibitory control over the present and the past.European Journal of Cognitive Psychology,13, 107–122.
Lustig, C., May, C. P., &Hasher, L. (2001). Working memory span and the role of proactive interference.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,130, 199–207.
Macmillan, N. A., &Creelman, C. D. (1991).Detection theory: A user’s guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
May, C. P., Hasher, L., &Kane, M. J. (1999). The role of interference in memory span.Memory & Cognition,27, 759–767.
Maylor, E. A., Vousden, J. I., &Brown, G. D. A. (1999). Adult age differences in short-term memory for serial order: Data and a model.Psychology & Aging,14, 572–594.
McDowd, J. M. (1997). Inhibition in attention and aging.Journals of Gerontology,52B, P265-P273.
Miles, C., Jones, D. M., &Madden, C. (1991). Locus of the irrelevant speech effect in short-term memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17, 578–584.
Murphy, D. R., McDowd, J. M., &Wilcox, K. A. (1999). Inhibition and aging: Similarities between younger and older adults as revealed by the processing of unattended auditory information.Psychology & Aging,14, 44–59.
Neath, I. (1999). Modelling the disruptive effects of irrelevant speech on order information.International Journal of Psychology,34, 410–418.
Neath, I. (2000). Modeling the effects of irrelevant speech on memory.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,7, 403–423.
Pichora-Fuller, M. K., Schneider, B. A., &Daneman, M. (1995). How young and old adults listen to and remember speech in noise.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,97, 593–608.
Rouleau, N., &Belleville, S. (1996). Irrelevant speech effect in aging: An assessment of inhibitory processes in working memory.Journals of Gerontology,51B, P356-P363.
Salamé, P., &Baddeley, A. D. (1982). Disruption of short-term memory by unattended speech: Implications for the structure of working memory.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,21, 150–164.
Salamé, P., &Baddeley, A. D. (1989). Effects of background music on phonological short-term memory.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,41A, 107–122.
Salthouse, T. A. (1990). Working memory as a processing resource in cognitive aging.Developmental Review,10, 101–124.
Salthouse, T. A. (1996). The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition.Psychological Review,103, 403–428.
Salthouse, T. A., Atkinson, T. M., &Berish, D. E. (2003). Executive functioning as a potential mediator of age-related cognitive decline in normal adults.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,132, 566–594.
Schneider, B. A., Daneman, M., Murphy, D. R., &See, S. K. (2000). Listening to discourse in distracting settings: The effects of aging.Psychology & Aging,15, 110–125.
Schneider, B. A., Daneman, M., &Pichora-Fuller, M. K. (2002). Listening in aging adults: From discourse comprehension to psychoacoustics.Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology,56, 139–152.
Tremblay, S., Nicholls, A. P., Alford, D., &Jones, D. M. (2000). The irrelevant sound effect: Does speech play a special role?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,26, 1750–1754.
Tun, P. A., O’Kane, G., &Wingfield, A. (2002). Distraction by competing speech in young and older adult listeners.Psychology & Aging,17, 453–467.
Tun, P. A., &Wingfield, A. (1999). One voice too many: Adult age differences in language processing with different types of distracting sounds.Journals of Gerontology,54B, P317-P327.
Verhaeghen, P., &De Meersman, L. (1998a). Aging and the negative priming effect: A meta-analysis.Psychology & Aging,13, 435–444.
Verhaeghen, P., &De Meersman, L. (1998b). Aging and the Stroop effect: A meta-analysis.Psychology & Aging,13, 120–126.
Verhaeghen, P., &Marcoen, A. (1993). Memory aging as a general phenomenon: Episodic recall of older adults is a function of episodic recall of young adults.Psychology & Aging,8, 380–388.
Zacks, R. T., &Hasher, L. (1994). Directed ignoring: Inhibitory regulation of working memory. In T. H. Carr & D. Dagenbach (Eds.),Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 241–264). San Diego: Academic Press.
Zacks, R. T., Hasher, L., &Li, K. Z. H. (2000). Human memory. In F. I. M. Craik & T. A. Salthouse (Eds.),The handbook of aging and cognition (2nd ed., pp. 293–357). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
The research reported in this article was supported by a grant from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Bu 945/4-3).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bell, R., Buchner, A. Equivalent irrelevant-sound effects for old and young adults. Memory & Cognition 35, 352–364 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193456
- Retention Interval
- Serial Position
- Sound Level
- Digit Span
- Serial Recall