Abstract
The multiprocess view proposes that both strategic and automatic processes can support prospective memory. In three experiments, we embedded a prospective memory task in a lexical decision task; cues were either highly associated with response words or had no relation. Analyses of RTs on ongoing task trials indicated that (1) prospective memory was more dependent on the allocation of resources immediately prior to cue presentation under conditions of low association in comparison with high association and (2) processes engaged on cue trials were more resource demanding under conditions of low association in comparison with high association. These data support the claim of the multiprocess view that prospective memory can be more resource demanding under some task conditions in comparison with others. However, the prospective memory performance data were less supportive, with declines in prospective memory due to task-importance and cue-frequency manipulations comparable across the low- and high-association conditions. Taken together, these results have implications for two prominent theories of prospective memory.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Brandimonte, M. A., Ferrante, D., Feresin, C., &Delbello, R. (2001). Dissociating prospective memory from vigilance processes.Psicológica,22, 97–113.
Brandimonte, M. A., &Passolunghi, M. C. (1994). The effect of cuefamiliarity, cue-distinctiveness, and retention interval on prospective remembering.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,47A, 565–587.
Burgess, P. W., &Shallice, T. (1997). The relationship between prospective memory and retrospective memory: Neuropsychological evidence. In M. A. Conway (Ed.),Cognitive models of memory (pp. 247–272). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cohen, J. (1988).Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Dennis, S. (1995).The Sydney Morning Herald word database.Noetica: Open Forum, 1. Retrieved March 15, 2007, from psych.psy.uq.oz.edu .au/CogPsych/Noetica/OpenForumIssue4/SMH.html.
Dobbs, A. R., &Rule, B. G. (1987). Prospective memory and selfreports of memory abilities in older adults.Canadian Journal of Psychology,41, 209–222.
Einstein, G. O., &McDaniel, M. A. (1990). Normal aging and prospective memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 717–726.
Einstein, G. O., &McDaniel, M. A. (1996). Retrieval processes in prospective memory: Theoretical approaches and some new empirical findings. In M. Brandimonte, G. O. Einstein, & M. A. McDaniel (Eds.),Prospective memory: Theory and applications (pp. 115–141). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Einstein, G. O., McDaniel, M. A., Manzi, M., Cochran, B., &Baker, M. (2000). Prospective memory and aging: Forgetting intentions over short delays.Psychology & Aging,15, 671–683.
Einstein, G. O., McDaniel, M. A., Thomas, R., Mayfield, S., Shank, H., Morrisette, N., &Breneiser, J. (2005). Multiple processes in prospective memory retrieval: Factors determining monitoring versus spontaneous retrieval.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,134, 327–342.
Einstein, G. O., Smith, R., McDaniel, M. A., &Shaw, P. (1997). Aging and prospective memory: The influence of increased task demands at encoding and retrieval.Psychology & Aging,12, 479–488.
Ellis, J. A. (1996). Prospective memory or the realization of delayed intentions: A conceptual framework for research. In M. Brandimonte, G. O. Einstein, & M. A. McDaniel (Eds.),Prospective memory: Theory and applications (pp. 1–22). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Graf, P., &Uttl, B. (2001). Prospective memory: A new focus for research.Consciousness & Cognition,10, 437–450.
Guynn, M. J. (2003). A two-process model of strategic monitoring in event-based prospective memory: Activation/retrieval mode and checking.International Journal of Psychology,38, 245–256.
Guynn, M. J., McDaniel, M. A., &Einstein, G. O. (2001). Remembering to perform actions: A different type of memory? In H. D. Zimmer, R. L. Cohen, M. J. Guynn, J. Engelkamp, R. Kormi-Nouri, & M. A. Foley (Eds.),Memory for action: A distinct form of episodic memory? (pp. 25–48). New York: Oxford University Press.
Hunt, R. R., &Toth, J. P. (1990). Perceptual identification, fragment completion, and free recall: Concepts and data.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 282–290.
Kliegel, M., Martin, M., McDaniel, M. A., &Einstein, G. O. (2004). Importance effects on performance in event-based prospective memory tasks.Memory,12, 553–561.
Kvavilashvili, L. J., &Ellis, J. A. (1996). Varieties of intention: Some distinctions and classifications. In M. Brandimonte, G. O. Einstein, & M. A. McDaniel (Eds.),Prospective memory: Theory and applications (pp. 23–51). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Marsh, R. L., Hancock, T. W., &Hicks, J. L. (2002). The demands of an ongoing activity influence the success of event-based prospective memory.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,9, 604–610.
Marsh, R. L., &Hicks, J. L. (1998). Event-based prospective memory and executive control of working memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24, 336–349.
Marsh, R. L., Hicks, J. L., &Cook, G. I. (2005). On the relationship between effort toward an ongoing task and cue detection in event-based prospective memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,31, 68–75.
Marsh, R. L., Hicks, J. L., Cook, G. I., Hansen, J. S., &Pallos, A. L. (2003). Interference to ongoing activities covaries with the characteristics of an event-based intention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,29, 861–870.
Marsh, R. L., Hicks, J. L., &Watson, V. (2002). The dynamics of intention retrieval and coordination of action in event-based prospective memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,28, 652–660.
Maylor, E. A. (1996). Does prospective memory decline with age? In M. Brandimonte, G. O. Einstein, & M. A. McDaniel (Eds.),Prospective memory: Theory and applications (pp. 173–198). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Maylor, E. A. (1998). Changes in event-based prospective memory across adulthood.Aging, Neuropsychology, & Cognition,5, 107–128.
McDaniel, M. A. (1995). Prospective memory: Progress and process. In D. L. Medin (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 33, pp. 191–221). San Diego: Academic Press.
McDaniel, M. A., &Einstein, G. O. (2000). Strategic and automatic processes in prospective memory retrieval: A multiprocess framework.Applied Cognitive Psychology,14, 127–144.
McDaniel, M. A., Guynn, M. J., Einstein, G. O., &Breneiser, J. (2004). Cue-focused and reflexive-associative processes in prospective memory retrieval.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,30, 605–614.
McDaniel, M. A., Robinson-Riegler, B., &Einstein, G. O. (1998). Prospective remembering: Perceptually driven or conceptually driven processes?Memory & Cognition,26, 121–134.
Moscovitch, M. (1994). Memory and working with memory: Evaluation of a component process model and comparisons with other models. In D. L. Schacter & E. Tulving (Eds.),Memory systems (pp. 269–310). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Nelson, D. L., McEvoy, C. L., & Schreiber, T. A. (1998).The University of South Florida word association, rhyme, and word fragment norms. Retrieved March 15, 2007, from w3.usf.edu/FreeAssociation/.
Park, D. C., Hertzog, C., Kidder, D. P., Morrell, R. W., &Mayhorn, C. B. (1997). Effect of age on event-based and time-based prospective memory.Psychology & Aging,12, 314–327.
Pashler, H. (1998).The psychology of attention. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Schneider, A., Eschman, A., &Zuccolotto, A. (2002).E-Prime reference guide. Pittsburgh: Psychology Software Tools.
Shallice, T., &Burgess, P. W. (1991). Deficits in strategy application following frontal lobe damage in man.Brain,114, 727–741.
Smith, R. E. (2003). The cost of remembering to remember in eventbased prospective memory: Investigating the capacity demands of delayed intention performance.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,29, 347–361.
Smith, R. E., &Bayen, U. J. (2004). A multinomial model of prospective memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,30, 756–777.
West, R., Krompinger, J., &Bowry, R. (2005). Disruptions of preparatory attention contribute to failures of prospective memory.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,12, 502–507.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by a research grant from the University of Queensland.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Loft, S., Yeo, G. An investigation into the resource requirements of event-based prospective memory. Memory & Cognition 35, 263–274 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193447
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193447