Abstract
We investigated the role that memory strength plays in the decision process by examining the extent to which strength is used as a cue to dynamically modify recognition criteria. The study list consisted of strong and weak items, with strength a function of study duration or repetition. The recognition test list was divided into two consecutive blocks; strong items appeared in one block, weak items in the other. If the change in item strength across blocks leads to a shift in criterion, the false alarm rate should change accordingly. In four experiments, the false alarm rates did not change across blocks, even when the difference between the strong and the weak items was magnified and marked with semantic cues. However, the strength of the items in the first test block affected the false alarm rate. Thus, strength cues influence initial criterion placement but fail to induce criterion shifts following permanent and even dramatic changes in item strength. These null findings are contrasted with those in a fifth experiment, in which accuracy feedback produced dynamic criterion shifts.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Banks, W. P. (1970). Signal detection theory and human memory.Psychological Bulletin,74, 81–99.
Benjamin, A. S. (2001). On the dual effects of repetition on false recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,27, 941–947.
Benjamin, A. S., &Bawa, S. (2004). Distractor plausibility and criterion placement in recognition.Journal of Memory & Language,51, 159–172.
Brown, S., &Steyvers, M. (2005). The dynamics of experimentally induced criterion shifts.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,31, 587–599.
Clark, S. E., &Gronlund, S. D. (1996). Global matching models of recognition memory: How the models match the data.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,3, 37–60.
Crowder, R. G. (1976).Principles of learning and memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Donaldson, W. (1996). The role of decision processes in remembering and knowing.Memory & Cognition,24, 523–533.
Dunn, J. C. (2004). Remember-know: A matter of confidence.Psychological Review,111, 524–542.
Estes, W. K., &Maddox, W. T. (1995). Interactions of stimulus attributes, base rates, and feedback in recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 1075–1095.
Gallo, D. A. (2004). Using recall to reduce false recognition: Diagnostic and disqualifying monitoring.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,30, 120–128.
Glanzer, M., Kim, K., &Adams, J. K. (1998). Response distribution as an explanation of the mirror effect.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24, 633–644.
Greene, R. L. (1996). Mirror effect in order and associative information: Role of response strategies.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,22, 687–695.
Heit, E., Brockdorff, N., &Lamberts, K. (2003). Adaptive changes of response criterion in recognition memory.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,10, 718–723.
Hekkanen, S. T., &McEvoy, C. (2002). False memories and sourcemonitoring problems: Criterion differences.Applied Cognitive Psychology,16, 73–85.
Hicks, J. L., &Marsh, R. L. (1998). A decrement-to-familiarity interpretation of the revelation effect from forced-choice tests of recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24, 1105–1120.
Hintzman, D. L., Caulton, D. A., &Curran, T. (1994). Retrieval constraints and the mirror effect.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,20, 275–289.
Hirshman, E. (1995). Decision processes in recognition memory: Criterion shifts and the list-strength paradigm.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 302–313.
Hirshman, E., &Arndt, J. (1997). Discriminating alternative conceptions of false recognition: The cases of word concreteness and word frequency.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 1306–1323.
Hirshman, E., &Henzler, A. (1998). The role of decision processes in conscious recollection.Psychological Science,9, 61–65.
Hockley, W. E., &Niewiadomski, M. W. (2001). Interrupting recognition memory: Tests of a criterion-change account of the revelation effect.Memory & Cognition,29, 1176–1184.
Jacoby, L. L., &Whitehouse, K. (1989). An illusion of memory: False recognition influenced by unconscious perception.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,118, 126–135.
Kensinger, E. A., &Schacter, D. L. (1999). When true memories suppress false memories: Effects of ageing.Cognitive Neuropsychology,16, 399–415.
Kučera, F., &Francis, W. N. (1967).Computational analysis of presentday American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
Macmillan, N. A., &Creelman, C. D. (2005).Detection theory: A user’s guide (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Melton, A. W. (1970). The situation with respect to the spacing of repetitions and memory.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,9, 596–606.
Miller, M. B., &Wolford, G. L. (1999). Theoretical commentary: The role of criterion shift in false memory.Psychological Review,106, 398–405.
Morrell, H. E. R., Gaitan, S., &Wixted, J. T. (2002). On the nature of the decision axis in signal-detection-based models of recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,28, 1095–1110.
Ratcliff, R., Clark, S. E., &Shiffrin, R. M. (1990). List-strength effect: I. Data and discussion.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 163–178.
Roediger, H. L., III, &McDermott, K. B. (1999). False alarms and false memories.Psychological Review,106, 406–410.
Rotello, C. M., Macmillan, N. A., Reeder, J. A., &Wong, M. (2005). The remember response: Subject to bias, graded, and not a process-pure indicator of recollection.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,12, 865–873.
Schwartz, B. L., Benjamin, A. S., &Bjork, R. A. (1997). The inferential and experiential bases of metamemory.Current Directions in Psychological Science,6, 132–137.
Strack, F., &Forster, J. (1995). Reporting recollective experiences: Direct access to memory systems?Psychological Science,6, 352–358.
Stretch, V., &Wixted, J. T. (1998). On the difference between strength-based and frequency-based mirror effects in recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24, 1379–1396.
Verde, M. F. (2004). Associative interference in recognition memory: A dual-process account.Memory & Cognition,32, 1273–1283.
Verde, M. F., Macmillan, N. A., &Rotello, C. M. (2006). Measures of sensitivity based on a single hit rate and false alarm rate: The accuracy, precision, and robustness of d’, Az, and A’.Perception & Psychophysics,68, 643–654.
Verde, M. F., &Rotello, C. M. (2003). Does familiarity change in the revelation effect?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,29, 739–746.
Watson, J. M., McDermott, K. B., &Balota, D. A. (2004). Attempting to avoid false memories in the Deese/Roediger-McDermott paradigm: Assessing the combined influence of practice and warnings in young and old adults.Memory & Cognition,32, 135–141.
Wells, G. L., &Olson, E. A. (2003). Eyewitness identification.Annual Review of Psychology,54, 277–295.
Whittlesea, B. W. A., &Williams, L. D. (1998). Why do strangers feel familiar, but friends don’t? A discrepancy-attribution account of feelings of familiarity.Acta Psychologica,98, 141–165.
Windmann, S., &Kutas, M. (2001). Electrophysiological correlates of emotion-induced recognition bias.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,13, 577–592.
Wixted, J. T. (1992). Subjective memorability and the mirror effect.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 681–690.
Wixted, J. T., &Stretch, V. (2000). The case against a criterion-shift account of false memory.Psychological Review,107, 368–376.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported in part by NIH Research Grant MH60274-02 to C.M.R. and N. Macmillan.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Verde, M.F., Rotello, C.M. Memory strength and the decision process in recognition memory. Memory & Cognition 35, 254–262 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193446
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193446