Abstract
In four experiments, we examined the effect that presenting a verbal stimulus (viz., an English noun) alongside an abstract visual stimulus (viz., a Chinese character) enhances recognition memory for the abstract visual stimulus. Experiment 1 demonstrated that the character-plus-word combination at both encoding and retrieval results in better recognition than does a character-alone presentation or presenting the combination at encoding only. Experiment 2 demonstrated that presenting the word first and then the character results in better performance than does the opposite order. Experiment 3 showed that the concreteness value of the word, not familiarity, is the critical factor. In Experiment 4, presentation time was varied. More time was needed for liftoff from chance level for the word-character combination than for the character-alone presentation. Together, the results suggest that subjects spontaneously assimilate stimulus and word into a single representation by building asymmetric effortful imagery associations, going from the English word to the Chinese character.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bellezza, F. S. (1983). Mnemonic-device instruction with adults. In M. Pressley & J. R. Levin (Eds.),Cognitive strategy research: Psychological foundations (pp. 51–73). New York: Springer.
Bower, G. H. (1972). Mental imagery and associative learning. In L. W. Gregg (Ed.),Cognition in learning and memory (pp. 51–88). New York: Wiley.
Carmichael, L., Hogan, H. P., &Walter, A. A. (1932). An experimental study of the effect of language on the reproduction of visually perceived forms.Journal of Experimental Psychology,15, 73–86.
Craik, F. I. M., &Tulving, E. (1975). Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,104, 268–294.
Crowder, R. G. (1976).Principles of learning and memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Daniel, T. C., &Toglia, M. P. (1976). Recognition gradients for random shapes following distinctive or equivalent verbal association training.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,2, 467–474.
Ellis, H. C. (1968). Transfer of stimulus predifferentiation to shape recognition and identification learning: Role of properties of verbal labels.Journal of Experimental Psychology,78, 401–409.
Ellis, H. C. (1973). Stimulus encoding processes in human learning and memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 7, pp. 123–182). New York: Academic Press.
Gilhooly, K. J., &Logie, R. H. (1980). Age-of-acquisition, imagery, concreteness, familiarity, and ambiguity measures for 1,944 words.Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation,12, 395–427.
Kahana, M. J. (2002). Associative symmetry and memory theory.Memory & Cognition,30, 823–840.
Kahana, M. J., &Loftus, G. (1999). eRsponse time versus accuracy in human memory. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.),The nature of cognition (pp. 322–384). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Mandler, G. (1980). Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence.Psychological Review,87, 252–271.
Meissner, C. A., &Brigham, J. C. (2001). A meta-analysis of the verbal overshadowing effect in face identification.Applied Cognitive Psychology,15, 603–616.
Paivio, A. (1965). Abstractness, imagery, and meaningfulness in pairedassociate learning.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,4, 32–38.
Paivio, A. (1971).Imagery and verbal processes. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Paivio, A., Yuille, J. C., &Madigan, S. A. (1968). Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns.Journal of Experimental Psychology Monographs,76(1, Pt. 2), 1–25.
Ranken, H. B. (1963). Language and thinking: Positive and negative effects of naming.Science,141, 48–50.
Santa, J. L. (1975). Verbal coding and redintegrative memory for shapes.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,104, 286–294.
Toglia, M. P., &Battig, W. R. (1978).Handbook of semantic word norms. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Tulving, E., &Thomson, D. M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory.Psychological Review,80, 352–373.
Underwood, B. J. (1964). Degree of learning and the measurement of forgetting.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,3, 112–129.
Verhaeghen, P., &Kliegl, R. (2000). The effects of learning a new algorithm on asymptotic accuracy and execution speed in old age: A reanalysis.Psychology & Aging,15, 648–656.
Verhaeghen, P., Marcoen, A., &Goossens, L. (1992). Improving memory performance in the aged through mnemonic training: A meta-analytic study.Psychology & Aging,7, 242–251.
Verhaeghen, P., Palfai, T., Cerella, J., Buchler, N., Johnson, M. P., D’Eredita, M., et al. (2000). Age-related dissociations in time-accuracy functions for recognition memory: Utilizing semantic support versus building new representations.Aging, Neuropsychology, & Cognition,7, 260–272.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
Note—This article was accepted by the previous editorial team, when Colin M. MacLeod was Editor.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Verhaeghen, P., Palfai, T. & Johnson, M.P. Verbal labeling as an assimilation mnemonic for abstract visual stimuli: The sample case of recognition memory for Chinese characters. Memory & Cognition 34, 795–803 (2006). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193427
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193427