Skip to main content

On the formation of collective memories: The role of a dominant narrator

Abstract

To test our hypothesis that conversations can contribute to the formation of collective memory, we asked participants to study stories and to recall them individually (pregroup recollection), then as a group (group recounting), and then once again individually (postgroup recollection}). One way that postgroup collective memories can be formed under these circumstances is if unshared pregroup recollections in the group recounting influences others’ postgroup recollections. In the present research, we explored (using tests of recall and recognition) whether the presence of a dominant narrator can facilitate the emergence of unshared pregroup recollections in a group recounting and whether this emergence is associated with changes in postgroup recollections. We argue that the formation of a collective memory through conversation is not inevitable but is limited by cognitive factors, such as conditions for social contagion, and by situational factors, such as the presence of a narrator.

References

  1. Asch, S. E. (1956). Studies of independence and conformity: A minority of one against a unanimous majority.Psychological Monographs,70(Whole No. 416).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bangerter, A. (2000). Identifying individual and collective acts of remembering in task-related communication.Discourse Processes,30, 237–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bangerter, A., von Cranach, M., &Arn, C. (1997). Collective remembering in the communicative regulation of group action: A functional approach.Journal of Language & Social Psychology,16, 365–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bar-Tal, D. (2000).Shared beliefs in a society. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Basden, B. H., Basden, D. R., Bryner, S., &Thomas, R. L., III (1997). A comparison of group and individual remembering: Does collaboration disrupt retrieval strategies?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 1176–1191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Basden, B. H., Basden, D. R., &Henry, S. (2000). Cost and benefits of collaborative remembering.Applied Cognitive Psychology,14, 497–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Basden, B. H., Reysen, M. B., &Basden, D. R. (2002). Transmitting false memories in social groups.American Journal of Psychology,115, 211–231.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Belli, R. F. (1988). Color blend retrievals: Compromise memories or deliberate compromise responses?Memory & Cognition,16, 314–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Binet, A. (1900).La suggestibilité. Paris: Schleicher Freres.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Coelho, P. (1993).The alchemist. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dritschel, B. H. (1991). Autobiographical memory in natural discourse: A methodological note.Applied Cognitive Psychology,5, 319–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Echterhoff, G., &Saar, M. (Eds.) (2002).Kontexte und Kulturen des Erinnerns. Konstanz: UVK.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fay, N., Garrod, S., &Carletta, J. (2000). Group discussion as interactive dialogue or as serial monologue: The influence of group size.Psychological Science,11, 481–486.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Fentress, J., &Wickham, C. (1992).Social memory. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fleiss, J. L. (1981).Statistical methods for rates and proportions. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gabbert, F., Memon, A., &Allan, K. (2003). Memory conformity: Can eyewitnesses influence each other’s memory for an event?Applied Cognitive Psychology,17, 533–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gladwell, M. (2002).The tipping point: How little things can make a big difference. New York: Back Bay Books.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Halbwachs, M. (1980).Collective memory. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hirst, W., &Manier, D. (1996). Social influences on remembering. In D. Rubin (Ed.),Remembering the past (pp. 271–290). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Hirst, W., &Manier, D. (2002). The diverse forms of collective memory. In G. Echterhoff & M. Saar (Eds.),Kontexte und Kulturen des Erinnerns (pp. 75–102). Konstanz: UVK.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hirst, W., Manier, D., &Apetroaia, I. (1997). The social construction of the remembered self: Family recounting. In J. G. Snodgrass & R. L. Thompson (Eds.),The self across psychology (Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 818, pp. 163–188). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Jerome, J. K. (1900).Three men on the bummel. Bristol: Arrowsmith.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kashy, D. A., &Kenny, D. A. (2000). The analysis of data from dyads and groups. In H. T. Reis & C. M. Judd (Eds.),Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 451–477). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kintsch, W. (1976). Memory for prose. In C. N. Cofer (Ed.),The structure of human memory (pp. 90–113). San Francisco: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Loftus, E. F. (1993). Made in memory: Distortion in memory after misleading communication. In D. L. Medin (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 30, pp. 187–215). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Manier, D. (1997). Family remembering: Autobiographical remembering in the context of family conversations.Dissertation Abstracts International,58(5-B), 2688. (University Microfilms No. 9732474)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Manier, D., Pinner, E., &Hirst, W. (1996). Conversational remembering. In D. Hermann, C. McEvoy, C. Hertzog, P. Hertel, & M. K. Johnson (Eds.),Basic and applied memory research: Practical applications (Vol. 2, pp. 269–286). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  28. McCann, C. D., &Higgins, R. (1992). Personal and contextual factors in communication: A review of the “communication game”. In G. R. Stein & K. Fiedler (Eds.),Language, interaction, and social cognition (pp. 144–172). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Meade, M. L., &Roediger, H. L., III (2002). Explorations in the social contagion of memory.Memory & Cognition,30, 995–1009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Middleton, D., &Edwards, D. (Eds.) (1990).Collective remembering. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Moreland, R. L., Argote, L., &Krishman, R. (1996). Socially shared cognition at work: Transactive memory and group performance. In J. L. Nye & A. M. Brower (Eds.), What’s social about social cognition? Research on socially shared cognition in small groups (pp. 57–86). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Olick, J. K. (1999). Collective memory: The two cultures.Sociological Theory,7, 333–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Olick, J. K., &Robbins, J. (1998). Social memory studies: From “collective memory” to the historical sociology of mnemonic practices.Annual Review of Sociology,24, 105–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Ozuru, Y., & Hirst, W. (2002, November). Conversational influence on recognition memory. Poster presented at 43rd Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Kansas City, MO.

  35. Pasupathi, M. (2001). The social construction of the personal past and its implications for adult development.Psychological Bulletin,127, 651–672.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Pennebaker, J. W., Paez, D., &Rime, B. (Eds.) (1997).Collective memory of political events. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Roediger, H. L., III,Meade, M. L., &Bergman, E. T. (2001). Social contagion of memory.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,8, 365–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Sherif, M. (1966).The psychology of social norms. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Sperber, D. (1996).Explaining culture: A naturalistic approach. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Stasser, G., Stewart, D. D., &Wittenbaum, G. M. (1995). Expert roles and information exchange during discussion: The importance of knowing who knows what.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,31, 244–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Stasser, G., &Titus, W. (1987). Effects of information load and percentage of shared information on the dissemination of unshared information during group discussion.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,53, 81–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Stewart, D. D., &Stasser, G. (1995). Expert role assignment and information sampling during collective recall and decision making.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,69, 619–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Tindale, R. S., &Sheffey, S. (2002). Shared information, cognitive load, and group memory.Group Processes & Intergroup Relations,5, 5–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Todorov, A., Lalljee, M., &Hirst, W. (2000). Communication context, explanation, and social judgment.European Journal of Social Psychology,30, 199–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Walther, E., Bless, H., Strack, F., Rackstraw, P., Wagner, D., &Werth, L. (2002). Conformity effects in memory as a function of group size, dissenters and uncertainty.Applied Cognitive Psychology,16, 793–810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Wegner, D. (1986). Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. In B. Mullen & G. Goethals (Eds.),Theories of group behavior (pp. 185–208). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Wegner, D., Erber, R., &Raymond, P. (1991). Transactive memory in close relationships.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,6, 923–929.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Weldon, M. S. (2001). Remembering as a social process. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 40, pp. 67–120). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Weldon, M. S., &Bellinger, K. D. (1997). Collective memory: Collaborative and individual processes in remembering.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 1160–1175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Weldon, M. S., Blair, C., &Huebsch, P. D. (2000). Group remembering: Does social loafing underlie collaborative inhibition?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,6, 1568–1577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Wertsch, J. (2002).Voices of collective remembering. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  52. Wilkes-Gibbs, D., & Kim, P. H. (1991, November). Discourse influences on memory for visual forms. Paper presented at the 32nd Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, San Francisco.

  53. Wittenbaum, G. M., &Park, E. S. (2001). The collective preference for shared information.Current Directions in Psychological Science,10, 70–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Wittenbaum, G. M., &Stasser, G. (1996). Management of information in small groups. In J. L. Nye & A. M. Brower (Eds.),What’s social about social cognition? Social cognition research in small groups (pp. 3–28). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Wright, D. B., Self, G., &Justice, C. (2000). Memory conformity: Exploring the misinformation effects when presented by another person.British Journal of Psychology,91, 189–202.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexandru Cuc.

Additional information

The first three authors contributed equally to this project. The order in which they are listed reflects the throw of a die.

Note—This article was accepted by the previous editorial team, when Colin M. MacLeod was Editor.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cuc, A., Ozuru, Y., Manier, D. et al. On the formation of collective memories: The role of a dominant narrator. Memory & Cognition 34, 752–762 (2006). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193423

Download citation

Keywords

  • False Alarm
  • Confidence Rating
  • False Recognition
  • Critical Item
  • Collective Memory