Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Menu
Find a journal Publish with us Track your research
Search
Cart
  1. Home
  2. Memory & Cognition
  3. Article

On the formation of collective memories: The role of a dominant narrator

  • Published: June 2006
  • Volume 34, pages 752–762, (2006)
  • Cite this article
Download PDF
Memory & Cognition Aims and scope Submit manuscript
On the formation of collective memories: The role of a dominant narrator
Download PDF
  • Alexandru Cuc1,
  • Yasuhiro Ozuru2,
  • David Manier3 &
  • …
  • William Hirst4 
  • 2153 Accesses

  • 100 Citations

  • 19 Altmetric

  • 2 Mentions

  • Explore all metrics

Abstract

To test our hypothesis that conversations can contribute to the formation of collective memory, we asked participants to study stories and to recall them individually (pregroup recollection), then as a group (group recounting), and then once again individually (postgroup recollection}). One way that postgroup collective memories can be formed under these circumstances is if unshared pregroup recollections in the group recounting influences others’ postgroup recollections. In the present research, we explored (using tests of recall and recognition) whether the presence of a dominant narrator can facilitate the emergence of unshared pregroup recollections in a group recounting and whether this emergence is associated with changes in postgroup recollections. We argue that the formation of a collective memory through conversation is not inevitable but is limited by cognitive factors, such as conditions for social contagion, and by situational factors, such as the presence of a narrator.

Article PDF

Download to read the full article text

Similar content being viewed by others

Advancing the ‘We’ Through Narrative

Article 15 March 2017

Shaun Gallagher & Deborah Tollefsen

Psychologie – Psychology

Chapter © 2023

Psychologie – Psychology

Chapter © 2020
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

References

  • Asch, S. E. (1956). Studies of independence and conformity: A minority of one against a unanimous majority.Psychological Monographs,70(Whole No. 416).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bangerter, A. (2000). Identifying individual and collective acts of remembering in task-related communication.Discourse Processes,30, 237–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bangerter, A., von Cranach, M., &Arn, C. (1997). Collective remembering in the communicative regulation of group action: A functional approach.Journal of Language & Social Psychology,16, 365–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Tal, D. (2000).Shared beliefs in a society. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basden, B. H., Basden, D. R., Bryner, S., &Thomas, R. L., III (1997). A comparison of group and individual remembering: Does collaboration disrupt retrieval strategies?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 1176–1191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basden, B. H., Basden, D. R., &Henry, S. (2000). Cost and benefits of collaborative remembering.Applied Cognitive Psychology,14, 497–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basden, B. H., Reysen, M. B., &Basden, D. R. (2002). Transmitting false memories in social groups.American Journal of Psychology,115, 211–231.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Belli, R. F. (1988). Color blend retrievals: Compromise memories or deliberate compromise responses?Memory & Cognition,16, 314–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binet, A. (1900).La suggestibilité. Paris: Schleicher Freres.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coelho, P. (1993).The alchemist. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dritschel, B. H. (1991). Autobiographical memory in natural discourse: A methodological note.Applied Cognitive Psychology,5, 319–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Echterhoff, G., &Saar, M. (Eds.) (2002).Kontexte und Kulturen des Erinnerns. Konstanz: UVK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fay, N., Garrod, S., &Carletta, J. (2000). Group discussion as interactive dialogue or as serial monologue: The influence of group size.Psychological Science,11, 481–486.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fentress, J., &Wickham, C. (1992).Social memory. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleiss, J. L. (1981).Statistical methods for rates and proportions. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabbert, F., Memon, A., &Allan, K. (2003). Memory conformity: Can eyewitnesses influence each other’s memory for an event?Applied Cognitive Psychology,17, 533–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gladwell, M. (2002).The tipping point: How little things can make a big difference. New York: Back Bay Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halbwachs, M. (1980).Collective memory. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, W., &Manier, D. (1996). Social influences on remembering. In D. Rubin (Ed.),Remembering the past (pp. 271–290). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, W., &Manier, D. (2002). The diverse forms of collective memory. In G. Echterhoff & M. Saar (Eds.),Kontexte und Kulturen des Erinnerns (pp. 75–102). Konstanz: UVK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, W., Manier, D., &Apetroaia, I. (1997). The social construction of the remembered self: Family recounting. In J. G. Snodgrass & R. L. Thompson (Eds.),The self across psychology (Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 818, pp. 163–188). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jerome, J. K. (1900).Three men on the bummel. Bristol: Arrowsmith.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kashy, D. A., &Kenny, D. A. (2000). The analysis of data from dyads and groups. In H. T. Reis & C. M. Judd (Eds.),Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 451–477). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kintsch, W. (1976). Memory for prose. In C. N. Cofer (Ed.),The structure of human memory (pp. 90–113). San Francisco: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loftus, E. F. (1993). Made in memory: Distortion in memory after misleading communication. In D. L. Medin (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 30, pp. 187–215). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manier, D. (1997). Family remembering: Autobiographical remembering in the context of family conversations.Dissertation Abstracts International,58(5-B), 2688. (University Microfilms No. 9732474)

    Google Scholar 

  • Manier, D., Pinner, E., &Hirst, W. (1996). Conversational remembering. In D. Hermann, C. McEvoy, C. Hertzog, P. Hertel, & M. K. Johnson (Eds.),Basic and applied memory research: Practical applications (Vol. 2, pp. 269–286). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCann, C. D., &Higgins, R. (1992). Personal and contextual factors in communication: A review of the “communication game”. In G. R. Stein & K. Fiedler (Eds.),Language, interaction, and social cognition (pp. 144–172). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meade, M. L., &Roediger, H. L., III (2002). Explorations in the social contagion of memory.Memory & Cognition,30, 995–1009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Middleton, D., &Edwards, D. (Eds.) (1990).Collective remembering. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreland, R. L., Argote, L., &Krishman, R. (1996). Socially shared cognition at work: Transactive memory and group performance. In J. L. Nye & A. M. Brower (Eds.), What’s social about social cognition? Research on socially shared cognition in small groups (pp. 57–86). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olick, J. K. (1999). Collective memory: The two cultures.Sociological Theory,7, 333–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olick, J. K., &Robbins, J. (1998). Social memory studies: From “collective memory” to the historical sociology of mnemonic practices.Annual Review of Sociology,24, 105–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozuru, Y., & Hirst, W. (2002, November). Conversational influence on recognition memory. Poster presented at 43rd Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Kansas City, MO.

  • Pasupathi, M. (2001). The social construction of the personal past and its implications for adult development.Psychological Bulletin,127, 651–672.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pennebaker, J. W., Paez, D., &Rime, B. (Eds.) (1997).Collective memory of political events. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roediger, H. L., III,Meade, M. L., &Bergman, E. T. (2001). Social contagion of memory.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,8, 365–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherif, M. (1966).The psychology of social norms. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperber, D. (1996).Explaining culture: A naturalistic approach. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stasser, G., Stewart, D. D., &Wittenbaum, G. M. (1995). Expert roles and information exchange during discussion: The importance of knowing who knows what.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,31, 244–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stasser, G., &Titus, W. (1987). Effects of information load and percentage of shared information on the dissemination of unshared information during group discussion.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,53, 81–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, D. D., &Stasser, G. (1995). Expert role assignment and information sampling during collective recall and decision making.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,69, 619–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tindale, R. S., &Sheffey, S. (2002). Shared information, cognitive load, and group memory.Group Processes & Intergroup Relations,5, 5–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todorov, A., Lalljee, M., &Hirst, W. (2000). Communication context, explanation, and social judgment.European Journal of Social Psychology,30, 199–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walther, E., Bless, H., Strack, F., Rackstraw, P., Wagner, D., &Werth, L. (2002). Conformity effects in memory as a function of group size, dissenters and uncertainty.Applied Cognitive Psychology,16, 793–810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wegner, D. (1986). Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. In B. Mullen & G. Goethals (Eds.),Theories of group behavior (pp. 185–208). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wegner, D., Erber, R., &Raymond, P. (1991). Transactive memory in close relationships.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,6, 923–929.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weldon, M. S. (2001). Remembering as a social process. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 40, pp. 67–120). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weldon, M. S., &Bellinger, K. D. (1997). Collective memory: Collaborative and individual processes in remembering.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 1160–1175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weldon, M. S., Blair, C., &Huebsch, P. D. (2000). Group remembering: Does social loafing underlie collaborative inhibition?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,6, 1568–1577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wertsch, J. (2002).Voices of collective remembering. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkes-Gibbs, D., & Kim, P. H. (1991, November). Discourse influences on memory for visual forms. Paper presented at the 32nd Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, San Francisco.

  • Wittenbaum, G. M., &Park, E. S. (2001). The collective preference for shared information.Current Directions in Psychological Science,10, 70–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittenbaum, G. M., &Stasser, G. (1996). Management of information in small groups. In J. L. Nye & A. M. Brower (Eds.),What’s social about social cognition? Social cognition research in small groups (pp. 3–28). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, D. B., Self, G., &Justice, C. (2000). Memory conformity: Exploring the misinformation effects when presented by another person.British Journal of Psychology,91, 189–202.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Behavioral Sciences, Farquhar College of Arts and Sciences, Nova Southeastern University, 3301 College Avenue, 33314, Fort Lauderdale, FL

    Alexandru Cuc

  2. University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee

    Yasuhiro Ozuru

  3. City University of New York, New York, New York

    David Manier

  4. New School University, New York, New York

    William Hirst

Authors
  1. Alexandru Cuc
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yasuhiro Ozuru
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. David Manier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. William Hirst
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexandru Cuc.

Additional information

The first three authors contributed equally to this project. The order in which they are listed reflects the throw of a die.

Note—This article was accepted by the previous editorial team, when Colin M. MacLeod was Editor.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cuc, A., Ozuru, Y., Manier, D. et al. On the formation of collective memories: The role of a dominant narrator. Memory & Cognition 34, 752–762 (2006). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193423

Download citation

  • Received: 07 December 2004

  • Accepted: 10 May 2005

  • Issue Date: June 2006

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193423

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • False Alarm
  • Confidence Rating
  • False Recognition
  • Critical Item
  • Collective Memory
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

Advertisement

search

Navigation

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Books A-Z

Publish with us

  • Publish your research
  • Open access publishing

Products and services

  • Our products
  • Librarians
  • Societies
  • Partners and advertisers

Our imprints

  • Springer
  • Nature Portfolio
  • BMC
  • Palgrave Macmillan
  • Apress
  • Your US state privacy rights
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Help and support

65.108.231.39

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2024 Springer Nature