Abstract
What is the nature of the knowledge that readers acquire as they learn to comprehend a novel construction in their native language? This question was explored in two experiments that examined the extent to which readers who learn a new construction are able to extend it to sentence contexts other than the one in which it initially appeared. Readers were trained on the needs construction (“The meal needs cooked given that dinner is in an hour”) and then were presented with examples of the construction in a different sentential context (“John thinks that what the meal needs is cooked given that dinner is in an hour”). The results show that readers have little difficulty comprehending the needs construction in the new context, even when the construction is used with a different verb. These findings are discussed with respect to theories of structural priming and sentence processing.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Baguley, T. (2003).Simple main effects in ANOVA. Retrieved December 9, 2003 from www-staff.lboro.ac.uk/~hutsb/simple.htm.
Bock, J. K. (1986). Syntactic persistence in language production.Cognitive Psychology,18, 355–387.
Bock, [J.] K. (1989). Closed-class imminence in sentence production.Cognition,31, 163–186.
Bock, [J.] K., &Griffin, Z. M. (2000). The persistence of structural priming: Transient activation or implicit learning?Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,129, 177–192.
Branigan, H. P., Pickering, M. J., &Cleland, A. A. (2000). Syntactic co-ordination in dialogue.Cognition,75, B13-B25.
Branigan, H. P., Pickering, M. J., &McLean, J. F. (2005). Priming prepositional-phrase attachment during comprehension.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,31, 468–481.
Branigan, H. P., Pickering, M. J., McLean, J. F., & Stewart, A. J. (in press). The scope of grammatical encoding during language production: Evidence from syntactic priming.Language & Cognitive Processes.
Brooks, P. J., &Tomasello, M. (1999). Young children learn to produce passives with nonce verbs.Developmental Psychology,35, 29–44.
Carey, P. W., Mehler, J., &Bever, T. G. (1970). Judging the veracity of ambiguous sentences.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,9, 243–254.
Chaffin, R., Morris, R. K., &Seely, R. E. (2001). Learning new word meanings from context: A study of eye movements.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,27, 225–235.
Chang, F., Dell, G. S., Bock, K., &Griffin, Z. M. (2000). Structural priming as implicit learning: A comparison of models of sentence production.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research,29, 217–229.
Cleland, A. A., &Pickering, M. J. (2003). The use of lexical and syntactic information in language production: Evidence from the priming of noun phrase structure.Journal of Memory & Language,49, 214–230.
Cleland, A. A., &Pickering, M. J. (2006). Do writing and speaking employ the same syntactic representations?Journal of Memory & Language,54, 185–198.
Dell, G. S., Reed, K. D., Adams, D. R., &Meyer, A. S. (2000). Speech errors, phonotactic constraints, and implicit learning: A study of the role of experience in language production.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,26, 1355–1367.
Ferreira, V. (2003). The persistence of optional complementizer production: Why saying that is not saying that at all.Journal of Memory & Language,48, 379–398.
Fisher, C. (1996). Structural limits on verb mapping: The role of analogy in childrens interpretations of sentences.Cognitive Psychology,31, 41–81.
Frazier, L., &Clifton, C. (1996).Construal. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Garnsey, S. M., Pearlmutter, N. J., Myers, E., &Lotocky, M. A. (1997). The contributions of verb bias and plausibility to the comprehension of temporarily ambiguous sentences.Journal of Memory & Language,37, 58–93.
Garrod, S., &Anderson, A. (1987). Saying what you mean in dialogue: A study in conceptual and semantic co-ordination.Cognition,27, 181–218.
Garrod, S., &Doherty, G. (1994). Conversation, co-ordination and convention: An empirical investigation of how groups establish linguistic conventions.Cognition,53, 181–215.
Griffin, Z. M., &Weinstein-Tull, J. (2003). Conceptual structure modulates structural priming in the production of complex sentences.Journal of Memory & Language,49, 537–555.
Kaschak, M. P., &Glenberg, A. M. (2000). Constructing meaning: The role of affordances and grammatical constructions in sentence comprehension.Journal of Memory & Language,43, 508–529.
Kaschak, M. P., &Glenberg, A. M. (2004). This construction needs learned.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,133, 450–467.
Kaschak, M. P., Loney, R. A., &Borreggine, K. L. (2006). Recent experience affects the strength of structural priming.Cognition,99, B73-B82.
Keppel, G. (1991).Design and analysis: A researchers handbook (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Labov, W. (1994).Principles of linguistic change: Vol. 1. Internal factors. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
Levin, B. (1993).English verbs. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
MacDonald, M. C., Pearlmutter, N. J., &Seidenberg, M. S. (1994). Lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution.Psychological Review,101, 676–703.
McRae, K., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., &Tanenhaus, M. K. (1998). Modeling the influence of thematic fit (and other constraints) in online sentence comprehension.Journal of Memory & Language,38, 283–312.
Murray, T. E., Frazier, T. C., &Simon, B. L. (1996).Need past participle in American English.American Speech,71, 255–271.
Murray, T. E., &Simon, B. L. (2001). At the intersection of regional and social dialects: The case of like past participle in American English.American Speech,77, 32–69.
Nygaard, L. C., &Pisoni, D. B. (1998). Talker-specific learning in speech perception.Perception & Psychophysics,60, 355–376.
Pickering, M. J., &Branigan, H. P. (1998). The representation of verbs: Evidence from syntactic priming in language production.Journal of Memory & Language,39, 633–651.
Pickering, M. J., Branigan, H. P., Cleland, A. A., &Stewart, A. J. (2000). Activation of syntactic information during language production.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research,29, 205–216.
Savage, C., Lieven, E., Theakston, A., &Tomasello, M. (2003). Testing the abstractness of childrens linguistic representations: Lexical and structural priming of syntactic constructions in young children.Developmental Science,6, 557–567.
Seidenberg, M. S., &MacDonald, M. C. (1999). A probabilistic constraints approach to language acquisition and processing.Cognitive Science,23, 569–588.
Trueswell, J. C., Tanenhaus, M. K., &Kello, C. (1993). Verbspecific constraints in sentence processing: Separating effects of lexical preference from garden-paths.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 528–553.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kaschak, M.P. What this construction needs is generalized. Memory & Cognition 34, 368–379 (2006). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193414
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193414