Abstract
In the present study, we examined the joint effects of aging, repetition, and response deadline in a plurality discrimination task. Young and older adults studied lists of unrelated singular and plural nouns, with half presented once (weak items) and half presented five times (strong items). Test lists contained old (same) nouns, plurality-reversed nouns (changed lures), and unstudied nouns (new lures), and the participants were asked to respond old only to same items. In Experiment 1, the participants were tested with both short and long deadlines. In Experiment 2, the tests were unpaced. In both experiments, repetition increased hit rates for young and older adults. Young adults tested with a long deadline or no deadline showed invariant (Experiment 1) or reduced (Experiment 2) false alarms to changed lures when the nouns were studied more often. Young adults tested with a short deadline and older adults tested with both long and short deadlines had increased false alarm rates for strong changed lures; without time pressure to respond, older adults did not have a significant increase in false alarms for changed lures. Implications of these results for theories of cognitive aging are explored.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Arndt, J., &Reder, L. M. (2002). Word frequency and receiver operating characteristic curves in recognition memory: Evidence for a dual-process interpretation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,28, 830–842.
Atkinson, R. C., &Juola, J. F. (1974). Search and decision processes in recognition memory. In D. H. Krantz, R. C. Atkinson, R. D. Luce, & P. Suppes (Eds.),Contemporary developments in mathematical psychology: Vol. 1. Learning, memory, and thinking (pp. 243–293). San Francisco: Freeman.
Bartlett, J. C., Strater, L., &Fulton, A. (1991). False recency and false fame of faces in young adulthood and old age.Memory & Cognition,19, 177–188.
Benjamin, A. S. (2001). On the dual effects of repetition on false recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,27, 941–947.
Benjamin, A. S., &Craik, F. I. M. (2001). Parallel effects of aging and time pressure on memory for source: Evidence from the spacing effect.Memory & Cognition,29, 691–697.
Benton, A. L., &Hamsher, K. D. (1976). Multilingual aphasia exam. Iowa City: University of Iowa.
Budson, A. E., Daffner, K. R., Desikan, R., &Schacter, D. L. (2000). When false recognition is unopposed by true recognition: Gist-based memory distortion in Alzheimer’s disease.Neuropsychology,14, 277–287.
Cleary, A. M., Curran, T., &Greene, R. L. (2001). Memory for detail in item versus associative memory.Memory & Cognition,29, 413–423.
Coltheart, M. (1981). The MRC Psycholinguistic Database.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,33A, 497–505. Available online at www.psy.uwa.edu.au/MRCDataBase/uwa_mrc.htm.
Curran, T. (2000). Brain potentials of recollection and familiarity.Memory & Cognition,28, 923–938.
Diller, D. E., Nobel, P. A., &Shiffrin, R. M. (2001). An ARC-REM model for accuracy and response time in recognition and recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,27, 414–435.
Gallo, D. A., &Roediger, H. L., III (2003). The effects of associations and aging on illusory recollection.Memory & Cognition,31, 1036–1044.
Healy, M. R., Light, L. L., &Chung, C. (2005). Dual-process models of associative recognition in young and older adults: Evidence from receiver operating characteristics.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,31, 768–788.
Hintzman, D. L. (2004). Judgment of frequency versus recognition confidence: Repetition and recursive reminding.Memory & Cognition,32, 336–350.
Hintzman, D. L., &Curran, T. (1994). Retrieval dynamics of recognition and frequency judgments: Evidence for separate processes of familiarity and recall.Journal of Memory & Language,33, 1–18.
Hintzman, D. L., &Curran, T. (1995). When encoding fails: Instructions, feedback, and registration without learning.Memory & Cognition,23, 213–226.
Hintzman, D. L., Curran, T., &Oppy, B. (1992). Effects of similarity and repetition on memory: Registration without learning?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 667–680.
Jacoby, L. L. (1999). Ironic effects of repetition: Measuring age-related differences in memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,25, 3–22.
Jones, T. C., &Jacoby, L. L. (2001). Feature and conjunction errors in recognition memory: Evidence for dual-process theory.Journal of Memory & Language,45, 82–102.
Kelley, R., &Wixted, J. T. (2001). On the nature of associative information in recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,27, 701–722.
Kensinger, E. A., &Schacter, D. L. (1999). When true memories suppress false memories: Effects of ageing.Cognitive Neuropsychology,16, 399–415.
Li, S.-C. (2002). Connecting the many levels and facets of cognitive aging.Current Directions in Psychological Science,11, 38–43.
Light, L. L., Patterson, M. M., Chung, C., &Healy, M. R. (2004). Effects of repetition and response deadline on associative recognition in young and older adults.Memory & Cognition,32, 1182–1193.
Light, L. L., Prull, M. W., La Voie, D. J., &Healy, M. R. (2000). Dual-process theories of memory in old age. In T. J. Perfect & E. A. Maylor (Eds.),Models of cognitive aging (pp. 238–300). New York: Oxford University Press.
Malmberg, K. J., Holden, J. E., &Shiffrin, R. M. (2004). Modeling the effects of repetitions, similarity, and normative word frequency on old-new recognition and judgments of frequency.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,30, 319–331.
Malmberg, K. J., Zeelenberg, R., &Shiffrin, R. M. (2004). Turning up the noise or turning down the volume? On the nature of the impairment of episodic recognition memory by Midazolam. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, & Cognition,30, 540–549.
Mandler, G. (1980). Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence.Psychological Review,87, 252–271.
Marchman, V. A., Plunkett, K., &Goodman, J. (1997). Overregularization in English plural and past tense inflectional morphology: A response to Marcus (1995).Journal of Child Language,24, 767–779.
Naveh-Benjamin, M. (2000). Adult age differences in memory performance: Tests of an associative deficit hypothesis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,26, 1170–1187.
Naveh-Benjamin, M., Hussain, Z., Guez, J., &Bar-On, M. (2003). Adult age differences in episodic memory: Further support for an associative-deficit hypothesis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,29, 826–837.
Nelson, M. J., &Denny, E. C. (1961).Examiner’s manual: The Nelson-Denny Reading Test. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Norman, K. A. (2002). Differential effects of list strength on recollection and familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,28, 1083–1094.
Norman, K. A., &O’Reilly, R. C. (2003). Modeling hippocampal andneocortical contributions to recognition memory: A complimentarylearning- systems approach.Psychological Review,110, 611–646.
Reder, L. M., Nhouyvanisvong, A., Schunn, C. D., Ayers, M. S., Angstadt, P., &Hiraki, K. (2000). A mechanistic account of the mirror effect for word frequency: A computational model of remember-know judgments in a continuous recognition paradigm.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,26, 294–320.
Reitan, R. M. (1992).Trail Making Test: Manual for administration and scoring. South Tucson, AZ: Reitan Neuropsychology Laboratory.
Rotello, C. M., Macmillan, N. A., &Van Tassel, G. (2000). Recallto-reject in recognition: Evidence from ROC curves.Journal of Memory & Language,43, 67–88.
Salthouse, T. A. (1992). Influence of processing speed on adult age differences in working memory.Acta Psychologica,79, 155–170.
Seamon, J. G., Luo, C. R., Schwartz, M. A., Jones, K. J., Lee, D. M., &Jones, S. J. (2002). Repetition can have similar or different effects on accurate and false recognition.Journal of Memory & Language,46, 323–340.
Sheffert, S. M., &Shiffrin, R. M. (2003). Auditory registration without learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,29, 10–21.
Shiffrin, R. M., &Steyvers, M. (1997). A model for recognition memory: REM-retrieving effectively from memory.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,4, 145–166.
Sommers, M. S., &Huff, L. M. (2003). The effects of age and dementia of the Alzheimer’s type on phonological false memories.Psychology & Aging,18, 791–806.
Watson, J. M., Balota, D. A., &Sergent-Marshall, S. D. (2001). Semantic, phonological, and hybrid veridical and false memories in healthy older adults and in individuals with dementia of the Alzheimer type.Neuropsychology,15, 254–267.
Watson, J. M., McDermott, K. B., &Balota, D. A. (2004). Attempting to avoid false memories in the Deese/Roediger-McDermott paradigm: Assessing the combined influence of practice and warnings in young and old adults.Memory & Cognition,32, 135–141.
Yonelinas, A. P. (2002). The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research. {Journal of Memory & Language},46, 441–517.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
A poster describing our results was presented at the 10th Cognitive Aging Conference, April 2004, Atlanta. This research was supported in part by Grant AG 02452 from the National Institute on Aging.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Light, L.L., Chung, C., Pendergrass, R. et al. Effects of repetition and response deadline on item recognition in young and older adults. Memory & Cognition 34, 335–343 (2006). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193411
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193411