Abstract
Context variability refers to the number of preexperimental contexts that are associated with concepts. In four experiments, we investigated the basis for increased recognition memory for low context variability words. Low context variability was associated with greater recollection in the hit rates, and high context variability was associated with greater familiarity in the false alarms. Shortening the study time reduced recollection, but low context variability still influenced recollection in the hit rates. A modality change from study to test also reduced recollection but preserved recollective differences for low versus high context variability items. One interpretation of the results suggests that low context variability evokes more specific and, perhaps, idiosyncratic recollective associations during learning and that these associations support better recognition in the hit rates. By contrast, activating the larger number of associations for high context variability items may be mistaken for familiarity in the false alarm rates.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Arndt, J., &Reder, L. M. (2002). Word frequency and receiver operating characteristic curves in recognition memory: Evidence for a dual-process interpretation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,28, 830–842.
Brown, J., Lewis, V. J., &Monk, A. F. (1977). Memorability, word frequency and negative recognition.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,29, 461–473.
Cary, M., &Reder, L. M. (2003). A dual-process account of the listlength and strength-based mirror effects in recognition.Journal of Memory & Language,49, 231–248.
Conway, M. A., Gardiner, J. M., Perfect, T. J., Anderson, S. J., &Cohen, G. (1997). Changes in memory awareness during learning: The acquisition of knowledge by psychology undergraduates.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,126, 393–413.
Dennis, S., & Humphreys, M. S. (2001). A context noise model of episodic word recognition. Psychological Review,108, 452–478.
Gardiner, J. M., &Java, R. I. (1990). Recollective experience in word and nonword recognition.Memory & Cognition,18, 23–30.
Gardiner, J. M., Ramponi, C., &Richardson-Klavehn, A. (1998). Experiences of remembering, knowing, and guessing.Consciousness & Cognition,7, 1–26.
Gardiner, J. M., &Richardson-Klavehn, A. (2000). Remembering and knowing. In E. Tulving and F. I. M. Craik (Eds.),The Oxford handbook of memory (pp. 229–244). New York: Oxford University Press.
Gillund, G., &Shiffrin, R. M. (1984). A retrieval model for both recognition and recall.Psychological Review,91, 1–67.
Glanzer, M., &Adams, J. K. (1985). The mirror effect in recognition memory.Memory & Cognition,13, 8–20.
Glanzer, M., &Adams, J. K. (1990). The mirror effect in recognition memory: Data and theory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 5–16.
Gregg, V. H., &Gardiner, J. M. (1994). Recognition memory and awareness: A large effect of study-test modalities on “know” responses following a highly perceptual orienting task.European Journal of Cognitive Psychology,6, 131–147.
Guttentag, R., &Carroll, D. (1997). Recollection-based recognition: Word frequency effects.Journal of Memory & Language,37, 502–516.
Hicks, J. L., &Marsh, R. L. (1999). Remember-know judgments can depend on how memory is tested. {Psychonomic Bulletin & Review},6, 117–122.
Hicks, J. L., Marsh, R. L., &Ritschel, L. (2002). The role of recollection and partial information in source monitoring.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,28, 503–508.
Hirshman, E., &Arndt, J. (1997). Discriminating alternative conceptions of false recognition: The cases of word concreteness and word frequency.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 1306–1323.
Hockley, W. F. (1994). Reflections of the mirror effect for item and associative recognition.Memory & Cognition,22, 713–722.
Howard, M. W., &Kahana, M. J. (2002). A distributed representation of temporal context.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,46, 269–299.
Humphreys, M. S., Dennis, S., Maguire, A. M., Reynolds, K., Bolland, S. W., &Hughes, J. D. (2003). What you get out of memory depends on the question you ask.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,29, 797–812.
Humphreys, M. S., &Maguire, A. M. (2005). Recollection and familiarity: Redundancy at the item level. In C. Izawa & N. Ohta (Eds.),Human learning and memory: Advances in theory and applications. The 4th Tsukuba International Conference on Memory (pp. 61–84). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Hunt, R. R., &Lamb, C. A. (2001). What causes the isolation effect?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,27, 1359–1366.
Jacoby, L. L. (1998). Invariance in automatic influences of memory: Toward a user’s guide for the process-dissociation procedure.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24, 3–26.
Jacoby, L. L. (1999). Ironic effects of repetition: Measuring age-related differences in memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,25, 3–22.
Jacoby, L. L., Yonelinas, A. P., &Jennings, J. M. (1997). The relationship between conscious and unconscious (automatic) influences: A declaration of independence. In J. D. Cohen & J. W. Schooler (Eds.),Scientific approaches to consciousness (pp. 13–47). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Joordens, S., &Hockley, W. E. (2000). Recollection and familiarity through the looking glass: When old does not mirror new.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,26, 1534–1555.
Kelley, C. M., &Jacoby, L. L. (1998). Subjective reports and process dissociation: Fluency, knowing, and feeling.Acta Psychologica,98, 127–140.
Kishiyama, M. M., &Yonelinas, A. P. (2003). Novelty effects on recollection and familiarity in recognition memory.Memory & Cognition,31, 1045–1051.
Lee, A. T., Tzeng, O. J. L., Garro, L. C., &Hung, D. L. (1978). Sensory modality and the word-frequency effect.Memory & Cognition,6, 306–311.
Macken, W. J. (2002). Environmental context and recognition: The role of recollection and familiarity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,28, 153–161.
Malmberg, K. J., &Nelson, T. O. (2003). The word frequency effect for recognition memory and the elevated-attention hypothesis.Memory & Cognition,31, 35–43.
McClelland, J. L., &Chappell, M. (1998). Familiarity breeds differentiation: A subjective-likelihood approach to the effects of experience in recognition memory.Psychological Review,105, 724–760.
Nelson, D. L., &McEvoy, C. L. (2000). What is this thing called frequency?Memory & Cognition,28, 509–522.
Nelson, D. L., Zhang, N., &McKinney, V. M. (2001). The ties that bind what is known to the recognition of what is new.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,27, 1147–1159.
Reder, L. M., Donavos, D. K., &Erickson, M. A. (2002). Perceptual match effects in direct tests of memory: The role of contextual fan.Memory & Cognition,30, 312–323.
Reder, L. M., Nhouyvanisvong, A., Schunn, C. D., Ayers, M. S., Angstadt, P., &Hiraki, K. (2000). A mechanistic account of the mirror effect for word frequency: A computational model of remember-know judgments in a continuous recognition paradigm.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,26, 294–320.
Roediger, H. L., III, &McDermott, K. B. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 803–814.
Roediger, H. L., III,Weldon, M. S., &Challis, B. H. (1989). Explaining dissociations between implicit and explicit measures of retention: A processing account. In H. L. Roediger III & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.),Varieties of memory and consciousness: Essays in honour of Endel Tulving (pp. 3–41). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Rotello, C. M., Macmillan, N. A., &Van Tassel, G. (2000). Recall-toreject in recognition: Evidence from ROC curves.Journal of Memory & Language,43, 67–88.
Smith, S. M., &Vela, E. (2001). Environmental context-dependent memory: A review and meta-analysis.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,8, 203–220.
Steyvers, M., &Malmberg, K. J. (2003). The effect of normative context variability on recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,29, 760–766.
Strack, F., &Bless, H. (1994). Memory for nonoccurrences: Metacognitive and presuppositional strategies.Journal of Memory & Language,33, 203–217.
Tulving, E. (1972). Episodic and semantic memory. In E. Tulving & W. Donaldson (Eds.),Organization of memory(pp. 381–403). New York: Academic Press.
Yonelinas, A. P., &Jacoby, L. L. (1995). The relation between remembering and knowing as bases for recognition: Effects of size congruency.Journal of Memory & Language,34, 622–643.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cook, G.I., Marsh, R.L. & Hicks, J.L. The Role of Recollection and Familiarity in the Context Variability Mirror Effect. Memory & Cognition 34, 240–250 (2006). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193402
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193402