Abstract
Does numeral format (e.g., 4 + 8 vs. four + eight) affect calculation per se? University students (N=47) solved single-digit addition problems presented as Arabic digits or English words and reported their strategies (memory retrieval or procedures such as counting or transformation). Decomposition of the response time (RT) distributions into μ (reflecting shift) and t (reflecting skew) confirmed that retrieval trials contributed predominantly to μ, whereas procedure trials contributed predominantly to τ. The format × problem size RT interaction (i.e., greater word-format RT costs for large problems than for small problems) was associated entirely with μ and not with τ. Reported use of procedures presented a corresponding format × size interaction. Together, these results indicate that, relative to the well-practiced digit format, the unfamiliar word format disrupts number-fact retrieval and promotes use of procedural strategies.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Ashcraft, M. H., &Christy, K. S. (1995). The frequency of arithmetic facts in elementary texts: Addition and multiplication in grades 1–6.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,26, 396–421.
Blankenberger, S., &Vorberg, D. (1997). The single-format assumption in arithmetic fact retrieval.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 721–738.
Campbell, J. I. D. (1994). Architectures for numerical cognition.Cognition,53, 1–44.
Campbell, J. I. D. (1997). Reading-based interference in cognitive arithmetic.Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology,51, 74–81.
Campbell, J. I. D. (1999). The surface form X problem-size interaction in cognitive arithmetic: Evidence against an encoding locus.Cognition,70, 25–33.
Campbell, J. I. D., &Austin, S. (2002). Effects of response time deadlines on adults’ strategy choices for simple addition.Memory & Cognition,30, 988–994.
Campbell, J. I. D., &Clark, J. M. (1992). Cognitive number processing: An encoding-complex perspective. In J. I. D. Campbell (Ed.),The nature and origins of mathematical skills (pp. 457–492). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Campbell, J. I. D., &Epp, L. J. (2005). Architectures for arithmetic. In J. I. D. Campbell (Ed.),Handbook of mathematical cognition (pp. 347–360). New York: Psychology Press.
Campbell, J. I. D., &Fugelsang, J. (2001). Strategy choice for arithmetic verification: Effects of numerical surface form.Cognition,80, B21-B30.
Campbell, J. I. D., &Gunter, R. (2002). Calculation, culture, and the repeated operand effect.Cognition,86, 71–96.
Campbell, J. I. D., Kanz, C. L., &Xue, Q. (1999). Number processing in Chinese-English bilinguals.Mathematical Cognition,5, 1–39.
Campbell, J. I. D., Parker, H. R., &Doetzel, N. L. (2004). Interactive effects of numerical surface form and operand parity in cognitive arithmetic.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,30, 51–64.
Campbell, J. I. D., &Timm, J. C. (2000). Adults’ strategy choices for simple addition: Effects of retrieval interference.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,7, 692–699.
Campbell, J. I. D., &Xue, Q. (2001). Cognitive arithmetic across cultures.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,130, 299–315.
Damian, M. F. (2004). Asymmetries in the processing of Arabic digits and number words.Memory & Cognition,32, 164–171.
Dehaene, S., &Cohen, L. (1995). Toward an anatomical and functional model of number processing.Mathematical Cognition,1, 83–120.
Geary, D. C. (1996). The problem-size effect in mental addition: Developmental and cross-national trends.Mathematical Cognition,2, 63–93.
Geary, D. C., &Wiley, J. G. (1991). Cognitive addition: Strategy choice and speed-of-processing differences in young and elderly adults.Psychology & Aging,6, 474–483.
Hamann, M. S., &Ashcraft, M. H. (1986). Textbook presentations of the basic addition facts.Cognition & Instruction,3, 173–192.
Heathcote, A. (1996). RTSYS: A DOS application for the analysis of reaction time data.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,28, 427–445.
Hecht, S. A. (1999). Individual solution processes while solving addition and multiplication math facts in adults.Memory & Cognition,27, 1097–1107.
Hockley, W. E. (1984). Analysis of response time distributions in the study of cognitive processes.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,6, 598–615.
Hohle, R. H. (1965). Inferred components of reaction times as functions of foreperiod duration.Journal of Experimental Psychology,69, 382–386.
Kirk, E. P., &Ashcraft, M. H. (2001). Telling stories: The perils and promise of using verbal reports to study math strategies.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,27, 157–175.
LeFevre, J.-A., Bisanz, J., Daley, K. E., Buffone, L., Greenham, S. L., &Sadesky, G. S. (1996). Multiple routes to solution of singledigit multiplication problems.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,125, 284–306.
LeFevre, J.-A., Sadesky, G. S., &Bisanz, J. (1996). Selection of procedures in mental addition: Reassessing the problem size effect in adults.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,22, 216–230.
Lemaire, P., &Reder, L. (1999). What affects strategy selection in arithmetic? The example of parity and five effects on product verification.Memory & Cognition,27, 364–382.
McCloskey, M. (1992). Cognitive mechanisms in numerical processing: Evidence from acquired dyscalculia.Cognition,44, 107–157.
McCloskey, M., Macaruso, P., &Whetstone, T. (1992). The functional architecture of numerical processing mechanisms: Defending the modular model. In J. I. D. Campbell (Ed.),The nature and origins of mathematical skills (pp. 493–537). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
McNeil, J. E., &Warrington, E. K. (1994). A dissociation between addition and subtraction with written calculation.Neuropsychologia,32, 717–728.
Noël, M.-P., Fias, W., &Brysbaert, M. (1997). About the influence of the presentation format on arithmetical-fact retrieval processes.Cognition,63, 335–374.
Penner-Wilger, M., & Leth-Steensen, C. (2005). Getting more from your data: Using the ex-Gaussian model to examine the shapes of response time distributions. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Penner-Wilger, M., Leth-Steensen, C., &LeFevre, J.-A. (2002). Decomposing the problem-size effect: A comparison of response time distributions across cultures.Memory & Cognition,30, 1160–1167.
Ratcliff, R. (1979). Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics.Psychological Bulletin,114, 510–532.
Ratcliff, R., &Murdock, B. B. (1976). Retrieval processes in recognition memory.Psychological Review,83, 190–214.
Sciama, S. C., Semenza, C., &Butterworth, B. (1999). Repetition priming in simple addition depends on surface form and typicality.Memory & Cognition,27, 116–127.
Siegler, R. S., &Shipley, C. (1995). Variation, selection, and cognitive change. In T. J. Simon & G. S. Halford (Eds.),Developing cognitive competence: New approaches to process modeling (pp. 31–76). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Smith, D. G., &Mewhort, D. J. K. (1998). The distribution of latencies constrains theories of decision time: A test of the random-walk model using numeric comparison.Australian Journal of Psychology,50, 149–156.
Zbrodoff, N. J., &Logan, G. D. (2005). What everyone finds: The problem-size effect. In J. I. D. Campbell (Ed.),Handbook of mathematical cognition (pp. 331–345). New York: Psychology Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
This research was supported by a grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Campbell, J.I.D., Penner-Wilger, M. Calculation latency: The μ of memory and the τ of transformation. Memory & Cognition 34, 217–226 (2006). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193400
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193400