Abstract
Five experiments were performed to investigate the category-based generalization ofnonblank properties, properties that were novel but that were attributed to existing category features with causal explanations. Experiments 1–3 tested how such explanations interact with the well-known effects of similarity on such generalizations. The results showed that when the causal explanations were used, standard effects of typicality (Experiment 1), diversity (Experiment 2), or similarity itself (Experiment 3) were almost completely eliminated. Experiments 4 and 5 demonstrated that category-based generalizations exhibit some of the standard properties of causal reasoning; for example, an effect (i.e., a novel category property) is judged to be more prevalent when its cause (i.e., an existing category feature) is also prevalent. These findings suggest that category-based property generalization is often an instance of causal inference.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bailenson, J. N., Shum, M. S., Atran, S., Medin, D. L., &Coley, J. D. (2002). A bird’s eye view: Biological categorization and reasoning within and across cultures.Cognition,84, 1–53.
Bloom, P. (2000).How children learn the meanings of words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gelman, S. A. (1988). The development of induction within natural kind and artifact categories.Cognitive Psychology,20, 65–95.
Gelman, S. A. (2003).The essential child: Origins of essentialism in everyday thought. New York: Oxford University Press.
Gelman, S. A., &Markman, E. M. (1986). Categories and induction in young children.Cognition,23, 183–208.
Hadjichristidis, C., Sloman, S. A., Stevenson, R., &Over, D. (2004). Feature centrality and property induction.Cognitive Science,28, 45–74.
Heit, E. (2000). Properties of inductive reasoning.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,7, 569–592.
Heit, E., &Rubinstein, J. (1994). Similarity and property effects in inductive reasoning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,20, 411–422.
Keil, F. C. (1989).Concepts, kinds, and cognitive development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kemp, C., &Tenenbaum, J. B. (2003). Theory-based induction. In R. Alterman & D. Kirsh (Eds.),Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 203–208). Boston: Cognitive Science Society.
Lassaline, M. E. (1996). Structural alignment in induction and similarity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,22, 754–770.
López, A., Atran, S., Coley, J. D., Medin, D. L., &Smith, E. E. (1997). The tree of life: Universal and cultural features of folkbiological taxonomies and inductions.Cognitive Psychology,32, 251–295.
López, A., Gelman, S. A., Gutheil, G., &Smith, E. E. (1992). The development of category-based induction.Child Development,63, 1070–1090.
Medin, D. L., Coley, J. D., Storms, G., &Hayes, B. K. (2003). A relevance theory of induction.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,10, 517–532.
Medin, D. L., &Ortony, A. (1989). Psychological essentialism. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.),Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 179–196). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Murphy, G. L., &Ross, B. H. (1999). Induction with cross-classified categories.Memory & Cognition,27, 1024–1041.
Osherson, D. N., Smith, E. E., Wilkie, O., López, A., &Shafir, E. (1990). Category-based induction.Psychological Review,97, 185–200.
Proffitt, J. B., Coley, J. D., &Medin, D. L. (2000). Expertise and category-based induction.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,26, 811–828.
Rehder, B. (2003a). Categorization as causal reasoning.Cognitive Science,27, 709–748.
Rehder, B. (2003b). A causal-model theory of conceptual representation and categorization.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,29, 1141–1159.
Rehder, B., &Burnett, R. C. (2005). Feature inference and the causal structure of categories.Cognitive Psychology,50, 264–314.
Rehder, B., &Hastie, R. (2001). Causal knowledge and categories: The effects of causal beliefs on categorization, induction, and similarity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,130, 323–360.
Rehder, B., &Hastie, R. (2004). Category coherence and categorybased property induction.Cognition,91, 113–153.
Rips, L. J. (2001). Necessity and natural categories.Psychological Bulletin,127, 827–852.
Ross, B. H., &Murphy, G. L. (1999). Food for thought: Crossclassification and category organization in a complex real-world domain.Cognitive Psychology,38, 495–553.
Shafto, P., &Coley, J. D. (2003). Development of categorization and reasoning in the natural world: Novices to experts, naive similarity to ecological knowledge.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,29, 641–649.
Sloman, S. A. (1993). Feature-based induction.Cognitive Psychology,25, 231–280.
Sloman, S. A. (1994). When explanations compete: The role of explanatory coherence on judgments of likelihood.Cognition,52, 1–21.
Sloman, S. A. (1997). Explanatory coherence and the induction of properties.Thinking & Reasoning,3, 81–110.
Sloman, S. A., Love, B. C., &Ahn, W.-K. (1998). Feature centrality and conceptual coherence.Cognitive Science,22, 189–228.
Smith, E. E., Shafir, E., &Osherson, D. (1993). Similarity, plausibility, and judgments of probability.Cognition,49, 67–96.
Wu, M. L., &Gentner, D. (1998). Structure in category-based induction. In M. A. Gernsbacher & S. J. Derry (Eds.),Proceedings of the 20th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1154–1158). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rehder, B. When similarity and causality compete in category-based property generalization. Memory & Cognition 34, 3–16 (2006). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193382
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193382