Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in
Menu
Find a journal Publish with us Track your research
Search
Cart
  1. Home
  2. Perception & Psychophysics
  3. Article

Time judgments in global temporal contexts

  • Published: April 2005
  • Volume 67, pages 398–417, (2005)
  • Cite this article
Download PDF
Perception & Psychophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript
Time judgments in global temporal contexts
Download PDF
  • Mari Riess Jones1 &
  • J. Devin Mcauley2 
  • 880 Accesses

  • Explore all metrics

Abstract

With three experiments, we examined the effects of global temporal context on time judgments as gauged by constant errors (CEs) and estimates of a preferred period (P). In Experiment 1, participants in seven different conditions listened to sequences of a given rate (with interonset intervals ranging from 200 to 800 msec) and judged the relative duration of a final (comparison) time interval. No P emerged. In Experiments 2 and 3, we embedded the same rates in different global (session) contexts that varied according to (1) mean session rate, (2) standard deviation, (3) range, and (4) number of different rates in a session. Evidence from CEs indicated that P varied primarily as a function of mean session rate and range of tempi. The best predictor of errors involved a measure termedrelative range (RR=range/mean session rate). A general algorithm incorporating RR successfully predicts P, and the implications of this algorithm are discussed.

Article PDF

Download to read the full article text

Similar content being viewed by others

Duration judgments are mediated by the similarity with the temporal context

Article Open access 30 December 2022

Expectation, information processing, and subjective duration

Article 31 October 2017

The role of Weber’s law in human time perception

Article 20 October 2020
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

References

  • Allan, L. G. (1977). The time—order error in judgments of duration.Canadian Journal of Psychology,31, 24–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allan, L. G. (1979). The perception of time.Perception & Psychophysics,26, 340–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, R., &Jones, M. R. (2000). Expectancy, attention, and time.Cognitive Psychology,41, 254–311.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boltz, M. (1994). Changes in internal tempo and effects on learning and remembering of event durations.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,20, 1154–1171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drake, C., &Botte, M.-C. (1993). Tempo sensitivity in auditory sequences: Evidence for a multiple-look model.Perception & Psychophysics,54, 277–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drake, C., Jones, M. R., &Baruch, C. (2000). The development of rhythmic attending in auditory sequences: Attunement, referent period, focal attending.Cognition,77, 251–288.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fraisse, P. (1963).The psychology of time. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraisse, P. (1978). Time and rhythm perception. In E. C. Carterette & M. P. Friedman (Eds.),Handbook of perception VIII: Perceptual coding (pp. 203–254). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraisse, P. (1984) Perception and estimation of time.Annual Review of Psychology,35, 1–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gescheider, G. (1997).Psychophysics: The fundamentals (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbon, J. (1977). Scalar expectancy theory and Weber’s law in animal timing.Psychological Review,84, 279–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstone, S., Lhamon, W. T., &Boardman, W. K. (1957). The time sense: Anchor effects and apparent duration.Journal of Psychology,44, 145–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, M. G. (1965). A modification of Thurstone’s law of comparative judgment to accommodate a judgment category of “equal” or “no difference”.Psychological Bulletin,64, 108–112.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grondin, S. (2001). From physical time to the first and second moments of psychological time.Psychological Bulletin,47, 22–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, A. R., &Darwin, C. J. (1982). Duration discrimination in a series of rhythmic events.Perception & Psychophysics,31, 86–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellstrom, A. (1979). Time errors and differential sensation weighting.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,5, 460–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hellstrom, A. (1985). The time—order error and its relatives: Mirrors of cognitive processes in comparing.Psychological Bulletin,97, 35–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helson, H. (1964).Adaptation-level theory. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsh, I. J., &Watson, C. S. (1996). Auditory psychophysics and perceptionAnnual Review of Psychology,47, 461–484.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hollingsworth, H. L. (1910). The central tendency of judgement.Journal of Philosophy, Psychology & Scientific Methods,7, 461–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson, D. G., &Petrusic, W. M. (1975). The dependence of time— order error direction on stimulus range.Canadian Journal of Psychology,29, 175–182.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M. R. (1976). Time, our lost dimension: Toward a new theory of perception, attention, and memory.Psychological Review,83, 323–355.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M. R. (2004). Attention and timing. In J. G. Neuhoff (Ed.), Ecological psychoacoustics (pp. 49–85). New York: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M. R., &Yee, W. (1997). Sensitivity to time change: The role of context and skill.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,23, 693–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jungers, M. K., Palmer, C., &Speer, S. R. (2002). Time after time: The coordinating influence of tempo in music and speech.Cognitive Processing,1, 21–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keele, S. W., Nicoletti, R., Ivry, R. I., &Pokorny, R. A. (1989). Mechanisms of perceptual timing: Beat-based or interval-based judgments?Psychological Research,50, 251–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirk, R. E. (1995). Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Large, E. W., &Jones, M. R. (1999). The dynamics of attending: How people track time-varying events.Psychological Review,106, 119–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacMillan, N. A., &Creelman, C. D. (1991).Detection theory: A user’s guide. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madison, G. (2001). Variation in isochronous tapping: Higher order dependencies as a function of intertap interval.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,27, 411–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAuley, J. D. (1995).Perception of time phase: Toward an adaptive oscillator model of rhythmic pattern processing. Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University.

  • McAuley, J. D., &Jones, M. R. (2003). Modeling effects of rhythmic context on perceived duration: A comparison of interval and entrainment approaches to short interval timing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,29, 1102–1125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAuley, J. D., &Kidd, G. R. (1998). Effect of deviations from temporal expectations on tempo discrimination of isochronous tone sequences.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 1786–1800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michels, W. C., &Helson, H. (1954). A quantitative theory of time— order effects.American Journal of Psychology,67, 327–334.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Monahan, C. B., &Hirsh, I. J. (1990). Studies in auditory timing: 2. Rhythm patterns.Perception & Psychophysics,47, 227–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Povel, D. J., &Essens, P. J. (1985). Perception of temporal patterns.Music Perception,2, 411–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulze, H. H. (1978). The detectability of local and global displacements in regular rhythmic patterns.Psychological Research,40, 173–181.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schulze, H. H. (1989). The perception of temporal deviations in isochronic patterns.Perception & Psychophysics,45, 291–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurstone, L. L. (1927). A law of comparative judgment.Psychological Review,34, 273–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todd, R., Boltz, M., &Jones, M. R. (1989). The Midilab auditory research system.Psychomusicology,8, 17–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treisman, M. (1963). Temporal discrimination and the indifference interval: Implications for a model of the “internal clock”.Psychological Monographs: General & Applied,77, 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turchioe, R. M. (1948). The relation of adjacent inhibitory stimuli to the central tendency effect.Journal of General Psychology,39, 3–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vierordt, K. (1868). Der Zeitsinn nach Versuchen. Tübingen: Laupp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallin, J. E. W. (1911a). Experimental studies of rhythm and time.Psychological Review,18, 100–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallin, J. E. W. (1911b). Experimental studies of rhythm and time: II. The preferred length of interval (tempo).Psychological Review,18, 202–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, R. M. (1985). Criterion shift rule and perceptual homeostasis.Psychological Review,92, 574–584.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wearden J. H., &Ferrara, A. (1995). Stimulus spacing effects in temporal bisection by humans.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,48B, 289–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wearden, J. H., &Ferrara, A. (1996). Stimulus range effects in temporal bisection by humans.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,49B, 24–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodrow, H. (1934). The temporal indifference interval determined by the method of mean error.Journal of Experimental Psychology,17, 167–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodrow, H. (1951). Time perception. In S. S. Stevens (Ed.),Handbook of experimental psychology (pp. 1224–1236). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodworth, R. S., &Schlosberg, H. (1954). Experimental psychology (rev. ed.) New York: Holt.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Ohio State University, 142 Townshend Hall, 43212, Columbus, OH

    Mari Riess Jones

  2. Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, Ohio

    J. Devin Mcauley

Authors
  1. Mari Riess Jones
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. Devin Mcauley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mari Riess Jones.

Additional information

A portion of this research was conducted while J.D.M. was a music cognition postdoctoral research fellow at Ohio State University. It was sponsored, in part, by grants awarded to M.R.J. from the International Foundation for Music Research and from the National Science Foundation (BCS-9809446).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jones, M.R., Mcauley, J.D. Time judgments in global temporal contexts. Perception & Psychophysics 67, 398–417 (2005). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193320

Download citation

  • Received: 03 November 2003

  • Accepted: 10 June 2004

  • Issue Date: April 2005

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193320

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Constant Error
  • Local Rate
  • Sequence Rate
  • Session Rate
  • Time Judgment
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

Advertisement

Search

Navigation

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Books A-Z

Publish with us

  • Journal finder
  • Publish your research
  • Open access publishing

Products and services

  • Our products
  • Librarians
  • Societies
  • Partners and advertisers

Our imprints

  • Springer
  • Nature Portfolio
  • BMC
  • Palgrave Macmillan
  • Apress
  • Your US state privacy rights
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Help and support
  • Cancel contracts here

65.109.116.201

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2025 Springer Nature