Abstract
Many studies report that people have difficulty in evoking odor images. In this article, we explore whether this results from another commonly observed phenomenon, difficulty in naming odors. In Experiment 1, participants both named and attempted to imagine either odors or their common visual referents. More-difficult-toname odors were reported as being more difficult to evoke as olfactory images, in comparison with the visual condition. In Experiment 2, participants received training prior to forming odor images and naming the same set of odors. As in Experiment 1, more-difficult-to-name odors were harder to imagine, but participants who had learned the odor names during training were significantly better, by their own report, at imagining many of these stimuli, relative to participants who were either exposed to the odors, exposed to their names, or who received no pretraining. In sum, these experiments suggest that odor naming may account for some of the difficulty reported by participants when attempting to evoke odor images; we discuss an associative basis for this effect.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Algom, D., &Cain, W. S. (1991). Remembered odors and mental mixtures: Tapping reservoirs of olfactory knowledge.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,17, 1104–1119.
Algom, D., Marks, L. E., &Cain, W. S. (1993). Memory psychophysics for chemosensation: Perceptual and mental mixtures of odor and taste.Chemical Senses,18, 151–160.
Ashton, R., &White, K. D. (1980). Sex differences in imagery vividness: An artefact of the test.British Journal of Psychology,71, 35–38.
Bensafi, M., Porter, J., Pouliot, S., Mainland, J., Johnson, B., Zelano, C., et al. (2003). Olfactomotor activity during imagery mimics that during perception.Nature Neuroscience,6, 1142–1144.
Bensafi, M., Pouliot, S., &Sobel, N. (2005). Odorant-specific patterns of sniffing during imagery distinguish “bad” and “good” olfactory imagers.Chemical Senses,30, 521–529.
Brower, D. (1947). The experimental study of imagery: II. The relative predominance of various imagery modalities.Journal of General Psychology,37, 199–200.
Cain, W. S. (1979). To know with the nose: Keys to odor identification.Science,203, 468–470.
Cain, W. S., de Wijk, R., Lulejian, C., Schiet, F., &See, L.-C. (1998). Odor identification: Perceptual and semantic dimensions.Chemical Senses,23, 309–326.
Cain, W. S., &Potts, B. C. (1996). Switch and bait: Probing the discriminative basis of odor identification via recognition memory.Chemical Senses,21, 35–44.
Crosley, C. J., &Dhamoon, S. (1983). Migrainous olfactory aura in a family.Archives of Neurology,40, 459.
Crowne, D. P., &Marlow, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology.Journal of Consulting Psychology,24, 349–354.
Daly, D. (1958). Uncinate fits.Neurology,8, 250–260.
Desor, J. A., &Beauchamp, G. K. (1974). The human capacity to transmit olfactory information.Perception & Psychophysics,16, 551–556.
Djordjevic, J., Zatorre, R., &Jones-Gotman, M. (2004). Effects of perceived and imagined odors on taste detection.Chemical Senses,29, 199–208.
Djordjevic, J., Zatorre, R., Petrides, M., &Jones-Gotman, M. (2004). The mind’s nose: Effects of odor and visual imagery on odor detection.Psychological Science,15, 143–148.
Gilbert, A. N., Crouch, M., &Kemp, S. E. (1998). Olfactory and visual mental imagery.Journal of Mental Imagery,22, 137–146.
Haberly, L. B. (2001). Parallel-distributed processing in olfactory cortex: New insights from morphological and physiological analysis of neuronal circuitry.Chemical Senses,26, 551–577.
Haberly, L. B., &Bower, J. M. (1989). Olfactory cortex: Model circuit for study of associative memory?Trends in Neurosciences,12, 258–264.
Hurovitz, C. S., Dunn, S., Domhoff, G. W., &Fiss, H. (1999). The dreams of blind men and women: A replication and extension of previous findings.Dreaming,9, 183–193.
Jonsson, F. U., Tchekhova, A., Lonner, P., &Olsson, M. J. (2005). A metamemory perspective on odor naming and identification.Chemical Senses,30, 353–365.
Kosslyn, S. M., Ganis, G., &Thompson, W. L. (2003). Mental imagery: Against the nihilistic hypothesis.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,7, 109–111.
Lawless, H. T. (1997). Olfactory psychophysics. In G. K. Beauchamp & L. Bartoshuk (Eds.),Tasting and smelling (pp. 125–175). San Diego: Academic Press.
Lawless, H. T., &Cain, W. S. (1975). Recognition memory for odors.Chemical Senses & Flavour,1, 331–337.
Lawless, H. T., &Engen, T. (1977). Associations to odors: Interference, mnemonics and verbal labelling.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,3, 52–59.
Li, Z., &Hertz, J. (2000). Odour recognition and segmentation by a model olfactory bulb and cortex.Network: Computational Neural Systems,11, 83–102.
Lindauer, M. S. (1969). Imagery and sensory modality.Perceptual & Motor Skills,29, 203–215.
Lorig, T. S. (1999). On the similarity of odor and language perception.Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews,23, 391–398.
Lyman, B. J., &McDaniels, M. A. (1990). Memory for odors and odor names: Modalities of elaboration and imagery.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 656–664.
Marks, D. F. (1973). Visual imagery differences in the recall of pictures.British Journal of Psychology,64, 17–24.
Marsella, A. J., &Quijano, W. Y. (1974). A comparison of vividness of mental imagery across different sensory modalities in Filipinos and Caucasian-Americans.Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,5, 451–465.
McKelvie, S. J. (1995). The VVIQ as a psychometric test of individual differences in visual imagery vividness: A critical quantitative review and plea for direction.Journal of Mental Imagery,19, 1–106.
Richardson, J. T. E. (1999).Imagery. Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
Rouby, C., &Bensafi, M. (2002). Is there a hedonic dimension to odors? In C. Rouby, B. Schaal, D. Dubois, R. Gervais, & A. Holley (Eds.),Olfaction, taste and cognition (pp. 140–159). Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
Segal, S. J. (1971). Processing of the stimulus in imagery and perception. In S. J. Segal (Ed.),Imagery: Current cognitive approaches (pp. 69–100). New York: Academic Press.
Sheehan, P. W. (1967). A shortened form of Betts’ Questionnaire upon mental imagery.Journal of Clinical Psychology,23, 386–389.
Stevenson, R. J., &Boakes, R. A. (2003). A mnemonic theory of odor perception.Psychological Review,110, 340–364.
Stevenson, R. J., &Case, T. I. (2005a). Olfactory dreams: Phenomenology, relationship to volitional imagery and odor identification.Imagination, Cognition & Personality,24, 69–90.
Stevenson, R. J., &Case, T. I. (2005b). Olfactory imagery: A review.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,12, 244–264.
Stevenson, R. J., &Prescott, J. (1997). Judgments of chemosensory mixtures in memory.Acta Psychologica,95, 195–214.
Stevenson, R. J., &Repacholi, B. M. (2003). Age-related changes in children’s hedonic response to male body odor.Developmental Psychology,39, 670–679.
White, K. D., Ashton, R., &Law, H. (1978). The measurement of imagery vividness: Effects of format and order on Betts’ Questionnaire upon mental imagery.Canadian Journal of the Behavioral Sciences,10, 68–78.
Wilson, D. A., &Stevenson, R. J. (2003). The fundamental role of memory in odor perception.Trends in Neurosciences,26, 243–248.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stevenson, R.J., Case, T.I. & Mahmut, M. Difficulty in evoking odor images: The role of odor naming. Memory & Cognition 35, 578–589 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193296
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193296