Abstract
Influences of feature-feature statistical co-occurrences and causal relations have been found in some circumstances, but not others. We hypothesized that detecting an influence of these knowledge types hinges crucially on the congruence between the task and type of knowledge. We show that both knowledge types influence tasks that tap feature relatedness. Detailed descriptions of causal theories were collected, and co-occurrence statistics were based on feature production norms. Regression analyses tested the influences of these knowledge types in untimed relatedness ratings and speeded relatedness decisions for 65 feature pairs spanning a range of correlational strength. Both knowledge types influenced both tasks, demonstrating that causal theories and statistical co-occurrences between features influence conceptual computations.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Ahn, W.-K., Kim, N. S., Lassaline, M. E., &Dennis, M. J. (2000). Causal status as a determinant of feature centrality.Cognitive Psychology,41, 361–416.
Ahn, W.-K., Marsh, J. K., Luhmann, C. C., &Lee, K. (2002). Effect of theory-based feature correlations on typicality judgments.Memory & Cognition,30, 107–118.
Billman, D., &Heit, E. (1988). Observational learning from internal feedback: A simulation of an adaptive learning method.Cognitive Science,12, 587–625.
Billman, D., &Knutson, J. (1996). Unsupervised concept learning and value systematicity: A complex whole aids learning the parts.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,22, 458–475.
Burnard, L. (2000). British National Corpus user reference guide version 2.0. Retrieved August 25, 2004, from www.hcu.ox.ac.uk/BNC/ World/HTML/urg.html
Chin-Parker, S., &Ross, B. H. (2002). The effect of category learning on sensitivity to within-category correlations.Memory & Cognition,30, 353–362.
Cohen, J. D., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., &Provost, J. (1993). PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,25, 257–271.
Cree, G. S., &McRae, K. (2003). Analyzing the factors underlying the structure and computation of the meaning ofchipmunk, cherry, chisel, cheese, and cello (and many other such concrete nouns).Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,132, 163–201.
Cree, G. S., McRae, K., &McNorgan, C. (1999). An attractor model of lexical conceptual processing: Simulating semantic priming.Cognitive Science,23, 371–414.
Gelman, S. A. (2003).The essential child: Origins of essentialism in everyday thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hopfield, J. J. (1982). Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,79, 2554–2558.
Hopfield, J. J. (1984). Neurons with graded response have collective computational features like those of two-state neurons.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,81, 3088–3092.
Jones, S. S., &Smith, L. B. (1993). The place of perception in children’s concepts.Cognitive Development,8, 113–139.
Keil, F. C. (2003). Categorisation, causation, and the limits of understanding.Language & Cognitive Processes,18, 663–692.
Lin, E. L., &Murphy, G. L. (1997). Effects of background knowledge on object categorization and part detection.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,23, 1153–1169.
Malt, B. C., &Smith, E. E. (1984). Correlated properties in natural categories.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,23, 250–269.
McRae, K. (2004). Semantic memory: Some insights from featurebased connectionist attractor networks. In B. H. Ross (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 45, pp. 41–86). San Diego: Academic Press.
McRae, K., Cree, G. S., Seidenberg, M. S., &McNorgan, C. (2005). Semantic feature production norms for a large set of living and nonliving things.Behavior Research Methods,37, 547–559.
McRae, K., Cree, G. S., Westmacott, R., &De Sa, V. R. (1999). Further evidence for feature correlations in semantic memory.Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology,53, 360–373.
McRae, K., De Sa, V. R., &Seidenberg, M. S. (1997). On the nature and scope of featural representations of word meaning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,126, 99–130.
Murphy, G. L. (2002).The big book of concepts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Murphy, G. L., &Medin, D. L. (1985). The role of theories in conceptual coherence.Psychological Review,92, 289–316.
Murphy, G. L., &Wisniewski, E. J. (1989). Feature correlations in conceptual representations. In G. Tiberghien (Ed.),Advances in cognitive science: Vol. 2. Theory and applications (pp. 23–45). Chichester, U.K.: Ellis Horwood.
Myers, J. L. (1979).Fundamentals of experimental design. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Palmeri, T. J., &Blalock, C. (2000). The role of background know ledge in speeded perceptual categorization.Cognition,77, B45-B57.
Rehder, B., &Hastie, R. (2004). Category coherence and categorybased property induction.Cognition,91, 113–153.
Rehder, B., &Murphy, G. L. (2003). A knowledge-resonance (KRES) model of category learning.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,10, 759–784.
Rosch, E., &Mervis, C. (1975). Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories.Cognitive Psychology,7, 573–605.
Sloman, S. A., Love, B. C., &Ahn, W. (1998). Feature centrality and conceptual coherence.Cognitive Science,22, 189–228.
Tangen, J. M., &Allan, L. G. (2004). Cue interaction and judgments of causality: Contributions of causal and associative processes.Memory & Cognition,32, 107–124.
Wattenmaker, W. D. (1991). Learning modes, feature correlations, and memory-based categorization.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17, 908–923.
Wattenmaker, W. D. (1993). Incidental concept learning, feature frequency, and correlated properties.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 203–222.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
This work was supported by a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council Doctoral Scholarship and a SHARCNET Graduate Research Fellowship to C.M., and by Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council Grant OGP0155704 and National Institutes of Health Grants R01-DC0418 and R01-MH6051701 to K.M. Part of the manuscript formed C.M.’s University of Western Ontario master’s thesis.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McNorgan, C., Kotack, R.A., Meehan, D.C. et al. Feature-feature causal relations and statistical co-occurrences in object concepts. Memory & Cognition 35, 418–431 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193282
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193282