We investigated the ability of people to retrieve information about objects as they moved through rooms in a virtual space. People were probed with object names that were either associated with the person (i.e., carried) or dissociated from the person (i.e., just set down). Also, people either did or did not shift spatial regions (i.e., go to a new room). Information about objects was less accessible when the objects were dissociated from the person. Furthermore, information about an object was also less available when there was a spatial shift. However, the spatial shift had a larger effect on memory for the currently associated object. These data are interpreted as being more supportive of a situation model explanation, following on work using narratives and film. Simpler memory-based accounts that do not take into account the context in which a person is embedded cannot adequately account for the results. This research was supported in part by a grant from the Army Research Institute, ARMY-DASW01-02-K-0003 and by funding from J. Chris Forsythe of Sandia National Laboratories.
Baddeley, A. [D.] (1986).Working memory. New York: Oxford University Press.
Copeland, D. E., Magliano, J. P., &Radvansky, G. A. (2006). Situation models in comprehension, memory, and augmented cognition. In C. Forsythe, M. L. Bernard, & T. E. Goldsmith (Eds.),Cognitive systems: Human cognitive models in system design (pp. 37–66). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Curiel, J. M., &Radvansky, G. A. (2002). Mental maps in memory retrieval and comprehension.Memory,10, 113–126.
Glenberg, A. M., Meyer, M., &Lindem, K. (1987). Mental models contribute to foregrounding during text comprehension.Journal of Memory & Language,26, 69–83.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983).Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Magliano, J. P., Miller, J., &Zwaan, R. A. (2001). Indexing space and time in film understanding.Applied Cognitive Psychology,15, 533–545.
Magliano, J. P., Radvansky, G. A., & Copeland, D. E. (in press). Beyond language comprehension: Situation models as a form of autobiographical memory. In F. Schmalhofer & C. A. Perfetti (Eds.),Higher level language processes in the brain: Inference and comprehension processes. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Morrow, D. G., Greenspan, S. L., &Bower, G. H. (1987). Accessibility and situation models in narrative comprehension.Journal of Memory & Language,26, 165–187.
Radvansky, G. A. (1998). The organization of information retrieved from situation models.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,5, 283–289.
Radvansky, G. A., &Copeland, D. E. (2000). Functionality and spatial relations in memory and language.Memory & Cognition,28, 987–992.
Radvansky, G. A., &Copeland, D. E. (2001). Working memory and situation model updating.Memory & Cognition,29, 1073–1080.
Radvansky, G. A., Copeland, D. E., Berish, D. E., &Dijkstra, K. (2003). Aging and situation model updating.Aging, Neuropsychology, & Cognition,10, 158–166.
Radvansky, G. A., Copeland, D. E., &Zwaan, R. A. (2003). Aging and functional spatial relations in comprehension and memory.Psychology & Aging,18, 161–165.
Radvansky, G. A., Spieler, D. H., &Zacks, R. T. (1993). Mental model organization.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 95–114.
Radvansky, G. A., &Zacks, R. T. (1991). Mental models and the fan effect.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17, 940–953.
Rinck, M., &Bower, G. H. (1995). Anaphor resolution and the focus of attention in situation models.Journal of Memory & Language,34, 110–131.
Rinck, M., Hähnel, A., Bower, G. H., &Glowalla, U. (1997). The metrics of spatial situation models.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 622–637.
Smith, S. M., Glenberg, A. [M.], &Bjork, R. A. (1978). Environmental context and human memory.Memory & Cognition,6, 342–353.
Sun, H.-J., Chan, G. S. W., &Campos, J. L. (2004). Active navigation and orientation-free spatial representations.Memory & Cognition,32, 51–71.
Thomson, D. M., &Tulving, E. (1970). Associative encoding and retrieval: Weak and strong cues.Journal of Experimental Psychology,86, 255–262.
Van Dijk, T. A., &Kintsch, W. (1983).Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
Waller, D., Loomis, J. M., &Haun, D. B. M. (2004). Body-based senses enhance knowledge of directions in large-scale environments.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,11, 157–163.
Wyer, R. S., Jr., &Radvansky, G. A. (1999). The comprehension and validation of social information.Psychological Review,106, 89–118.
Zwaan, R. A., Langston, M. C., &Graesser, A. C. (1995). The construction of situation models in narrative comprehension: An eventindexing model.Psychological Science,6, 292–297.
Zwaan, R. A., Magliano, J. P., &Graesser, A. C. (1995). Dimensions of situation model construction in narrative comprehension.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 386–397.
Zwaan, R. A., &Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory.Psychological Bulletin,123, 162–185.
Zwaan, R. A., Radvansky, G. A., Hilliard, A. E., &Curiel, J. M. (1998). Constructing multidimensional situation models during reading.Scientific Studies of Reading,2, 199–220.
Zwaan, R. A., &van Oostendorp, H. (1993). Do readers construct spatial representations in naturalistic story comprehension?Discourse Processes,16, 124–143.
Note—This article was accepted by the previous editorial team, when Colin M. MacLeod was Editor.
About this article
Cite this article
Radvansky, G.A., Copeland, D.E. Walking through doorways causes forgetting: Situation models and experienced space. Memory & Cognition 34, 1150–1156 (2006). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193261
- Motion Sickness
- Situation Model
- Virtual Space
- Text Comprehension
- Spatial Shift