Walking through doorways causes forgetting: Situation models and experienced space

Abstract

We investigated the ability of people to retrieve information about objects as they moved through rooms in a virtual space. People were probed with object names that were either associated with the person (i.e., carried) or dissociated from the person (i.e., just set down). Also, people either did or did not shift spatial regions (i.e., go to a new room). Information about objects was less accessible when the objects were dissociated from the person. Furthermore, information about an object was also less available when there was a spatial shift. However, the spatial shift had a larger effect on memory for the currently associated object. These data are interpreted as being more supportive of a situation model explanation, following on work using narratives and film. Simpler memory-based accounts that do not take into account the context in which a person is embedded cannot adequately account for the results. This research was supported in part by a grant from the Army Research Institute, ARMY-DASW01-02-K-0003 and by funding from J. Chris Forsythe of Sandia National Laboratories.

References

  1. Baddeley, A. [D.] (1986).Working memory. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Copeland, D. E., Magliano, J. P., &Radvansky, G. A. (2006). Situation models in comprehension, memory, and augmented cognition. In C. Forsythe, M. L. Bernard, & T. E. Goldsmith (Eds.),Cognitive systems: Human cognitive models in system design (pp. 37–66). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Curiel, J. M., &Radvansky, G. A. (2002). Mental maps in memory retrieval and comprehension.Memory,10, 113–126.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Glenberg, A. M., Meyer, M., &Lindem, K. (1987). Mental models contribute to foregrounding during text comprehension.Journal of Memory & Language,26, 69–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983).Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Magliano, J. P., Miller, J., &Zwaan, R. A. (2001). Indexing space and time in film understanding.Applied Cognitive Psychology,15, 533–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Magliano, J. P., Radvansky, G. A., & Copeland, D. E. (in press). Beyond language comprehension: Situation models as a form of autobiographical memory. In F. Schmalhofer & C. A. Perfetti (Eds.),Higher level language processes in the brain: Inference and comprehension processes. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

  8. Morrow, D. G., Greenspan, S. L., &Bower, G. H. (1987). Accessibility and situation models in narrative comprehension.Journal of Memory & Language,26, 165–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Radvansky, G. A. (1998). The organization of information retrieved from situation models.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,5, 283–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Radvansky, G. A., &Copeland, D. E. (2000). Functionality and spatial relations in memory and language.Memory & Cognition,28, 987–992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Radvansky, G. A., &Copeland, D. E. (2001). Working memory and situation model updating.Memory & Cognition,29, 1073–1080.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Radvansky, G. A., Copeland, D. E., Berish, D. E., &Dijkstra, K. (2003). Aging and situation model updating.Aging, Neuropsychology, & Cognition,10, 158–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Radvansky, G. A., Copeland, D. E., &Zwaan, R. A. (2003). Aging and functional spatial relations in comprehension and memory.Psychology & Aging,18, 161–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Radvansky, G. A., Spieler, D. H., &Zacks, R. T. (1993). Mental model organization.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 95–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Radvansky, G. A., &Zacks, R. T. (1991). Mental models and the fan effect.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17, 940–953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rinck, M., &Bower, G. H. (1995). Anaphor resolution and the focus of attention in situation models.Journal of Memory & Language,34, 110–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rinck, M., Hähnel, A., Bower, G. H., &Glowalla, U. (1997). The metrics of spatial situation models.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 622–637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Smith, S. M., Glenberg, A. [M.], &Bjork, R. A. (1978). Environmental context and human memory.Memory & Cognition,6, 342–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sun, H.-J., Chan, G. S. W., &Campos, J. L. (2004). Active navigation and orientation-free spatial representations.Memory & Cognition,32, 51–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Thomson, D. M., &Tulving, E. (1970). Associative encoding and retrieval: Weak and strong cues.Journal of Experimental Psychology,86, 255–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Van Dijk, T. A., &Kintsch, W. (1983).Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Waller, D., Loomis, J. M., &Haun, D. B. M. (2004). Body-based senses enhance knowledge of directions in large-scale environments.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,11, 157–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wyer, R. S., Jr., &Radvansky, G. A. (1999). The comprehension and validation of social information.Psychological Review,106, 89–118.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Zwaan, R. A., Langston, M. C., &Graesser, A. C. (1995). The construction of situation models in narrative comprehension: An eventindexing model.Psychological Science,6, 292–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zwaan, R. A., Magliano, J. P., &Graesser, A. C. (1995). Dimensions of situation model construction in narrative comprehension.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 386–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zwaan, R. A., &Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory.Psychological Bulletin,123, 162–185.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Zwaan, R. A., Radvansky, G. A., Hilliard, A. E., &Curiel, J. M. (1998). Constructing multidimensional situation models during reading.Scientific Studies of Reading,2, 199–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zwaan, R. A., &van Oostendorp, H. (1993). Do readers construct spatial representations in naturalistic story comprehension?Discourse Processes,16, 124–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gabriel A. Radvansky.

Additional information

Note—This article was accepted by the previous editorial team, when Colin M. MacLeod was Editor.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Radvansky, G.A., Copeland, D.E. Walking through doorways causes forgetting: Situation models and experienced space. Memory & Cognition 34, 1150–1156 (2006). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193261

Download citation

Keywords

  • Motion Sickness
  • Situation Model
  • Virtual Space
  • Text Comprehension
  • Spatial Shift