Memory & Cognition

, Volume 34, Issue 5, pp 1150–1156 | Cite as

Walking through doorways causes forgetting: Situation models and experienced space

  • Gabriel A. RadvanskyEmail author
  • David E. Copeland


We investigated the ability of people to retrieve information about objects as they moved through rooms in a virtual space. People were probed with object names that were either associated with the person (i.e., carried) or dissociated from the person (i.e., just set down). Also, people either did or did not shift spatial regions (i.e., go to a new room). Information about objects was less accessible when the objects were dissociated from the person. Furthermore, information about an object was also less available when there was a spatial shift. However, the spatial shift had a larger effect on memory for the currently associated object. These data are interpreted as being more supportive of a situation model explanation, following on work using narratives and film. Simpler memory-based accounts that do not take into account the context in which a person is embedded cannot adequately account for the results. This research was supported in part by a grant from the Army Research Institute, ARMY-DASW01-02-K-0003 and by funding from J. Chris Forsythe of Sandia National Laboratories.


Motion Sickness Situation Model Virtual Space Text Comprehension Spatial Shift 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Baddeley, A. [D.] (1986).Working memory. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Copeland, D. E., Magliano, J. P., &Radvansky, G. A. (2006). Situation models in comprehension, memory, and augmented cognition. In C. Forsythe, M. L. Bernard, & T. E. Goldsmith (Eds.),Cognitive systems: Human cognitive models in system design (pp. 37–66). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  3. Curiel, J. M., &Radvansky, G. A. (2002). Mental maps in memory retrieval and comprehension.Memory,10, 113–126.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Glenberg, A. M., Meyer, M., &Lindem, K. (1987). Mental models contribute to foregrounding during text comprehension.Journal of Memory & Language,26, 69–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983).Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Magliano, J. P., Miller, J., &Zwaan, R. A. (2001). Indexing space and time in film understanding.Applied Cognitive Psychology,15, 533–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Magliano, J. P., Radvansky, G. A., & Copeland, D. E. (in press). Beyond language comprehension: Situation models as a form of autobiographical memory. In F. Schmalhofer & C. A. Perfetti (Eds.),Higher level language processes in the brain: Inference and comprehension processes. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  8. Morrow, D. G., Greenspan, S. L., &Bower, G. H. (1987). Accessibility and situation models in narrative comprehension.Journal of Memory & Language,26, 165–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Radvansky, G. A. (1998). The organization of information retrieved from situation models.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,5, 283–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Radvansky, G. A., &Copeland, D. E. (2000). Functionality and spatial relations in memory and language.Memory & Cognition,28, 987–992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Radvansky, G. A., &Copeland, D. E. (2001). Working memory and situation model updating.Memory & Cognition,29, 1073–1080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Radvansky, G. A., Copeland, D. E., Berish, D. E., &Dijkstra, K. (2003). Aging and situation model updating.Aging, Neuropsychology, & Cognition,10, 158–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Radvansky, G. A., Copeland, D. E., &Zwaan, R. A. (2003). Aging and functional spatial relations in comprehension and memory.Psychology & Aging,18, 161–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Radvansky, G. A., Spieler, D. H., &Zacks, R. T. (1993). Mental model organization.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 95–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Radvansky, G. A., &Zacks, R. T. (1991). Mental models and the fan effect.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17, 940–953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rinck, M., &Bower, G. H. (1995). Anaphor resolution and the focus of attention in situation models.Journal of Memory & Language,34, 110–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rinck, M., Hähnel, A., Bower, G. H., &Glowalla, U. (1997). The metrics of spatial situation models.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 622–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Smith, S. M., Glenberg, A. [M.], &Bjork, R. A. (1978). Environmental context and human memory.Memory & Cognition,6, 342–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sun, H.-J., Chan, G. S. W., &Campos, J. L. (2004). Active navigation and orientation-free spatial representations.Memory & Cognition,32, 51–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Thomson, D. M., &Tulving, E. (1970). Associative encoding and retrieval: Weak and strong cues.Journal of Experimental Psychology,86, 255–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Van Dijk, T. A., &Kintsch, W. (1983).Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  22. Waller, D., Loomis, J. M., &Haun, D. B. M. (2004). Body-based senses enhance knowledge of directions in large-scale environments.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,11, 157–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wyer, R. S., Jr., &Radvansky, G. A. (1999). The comprehension and validation of social information.Psychological Review,106, 89–118.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Zwaan, R. A., Langston, M. C., &Graesser, A. C. (1995). The construction of situation models in narrative comprehension: An eventindexing model.Psychological Science,6, 292–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Zwaan, R. A., Magliano, J. P., &Graesser, A. C. (1995). Dimensions of situation model construction in narrative comprehension.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 386–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Zwaan, R. A., &Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory.Psychological Bulletin,123, 162–185.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Zwaan, R. A., Radvansky, G. A., Hilliard, A. E., &Curiel, J. M. (1998). Constructing multidimensional situation models during reading.Scientific Studies of Reading,2, 199–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zwaan, R. A., &van Oostendorp, H. (1993). Do readers construct spatial representations in naturalistic story comprehension?Discourse Processes,16, 124–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Notre DameNotre Dame
  2. 2.University of Southern MississippiHattiesburg

Personalised recommendations