Abstract
Tehan and Humphreys’s (1995, 1996) short-term cued recall paradigm showed that recall in shortterm memory is cue driven. In critical trials, the participants studied two blocks of four words each and were required to forget the first block while remembering the second block. A foil in the first block (e.g.,orange) was related to a target (e.g.,carrot) in the second block. Proactive interference (PI) was evident when a retrieval cue was used that subsumed the foil and the target (e.g.,type of juice), but not when a cue was used that subsumed only the target (e.g.,type of vegetable). Four experiments were performed to examine the extent to which contextual organization in the foil block would enhance or diminish the foil’s efficacy in creating PI. A novel condition was included in which the words in the foil block were studied in a phonologically related context but the target was cued semantically, and vice versa with a semantic context and phonological cue. There were no differences in recall accuracy between conditions with and without contextual organization, but reliable increases in foil intrusions were observed when contextual organization was present. Contextual organization enhanced the foil, rather than diminished it, but the strengthened foil generated PI only when the cue subsumed the foil and the target and had no effect when the cue subsumed only the target. The results are consistent with a cue-driven retrieval interpretation of short-term recall.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Baddeley, A. D. (2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory?Trends in Cognitive Sciences,4, 417–423.
Baddeley, A. D., &Hitch, G. J. (1974). Working memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 8, pp. 47–89). New York: Academic Press.
Battig, W. F., &Montague, W. E. (1969). Category norms for verbal items in 56 categories: A replication and extension of the Connecticut category norms.Journal of Experimental Psychology Monographs,80 (Pt.2), 1–46.
Bourassa, D. C., &Besner, D. (1994). Beyond the articulatory loop: A semantic contribution to serial order recall of subspan lists.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,1, 122–125.
Caza, N., Belleville, S., &Gilbert, B. (2002). How loss of meaning with preservation of phonological word form affects immediate serial recall performance: A linguistic account.NeuroCase,8, 255–273.
Conrad, R., &Hull, A. J. (1964). Information, acoustic confusion, and memory span.British Journal of Psychology,55, 429–432.
Dillon, R. F., &Bittner, L. A. (1975). Analysis of retrieval cues and release from proactive inhibition.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,14, 616–622.
Fallon, A. B., Groves, K., &Tehan, G. (1999). Phonological similarity and trace degradation in the serial recall task: When cat helps rat, but not man.International Journal of Psychology,34, 301–307.
Gardiner, J. M., Craik, F. I. M., &Birtwistle, J. (1972). Retrieval cues and release from proactive inhibition.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,11, 778–783.
Gathercole, S. E., Frankish, C. R., Pickering, S. J., &Peaker, S. (1999). Phonotactic influences on short-term memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,25, 84–95.
Goh, W. D., &Pisoni, D. B. (2003). Effects of lexical competition on immediate memory span for spoken words.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,56A, 929–954.
Hulme, C., Maughan, S., &Brown, G. D. A. (1991). Memory for familiar and unfamiliar words: Evidence for a long-term memory contribution to short-term memory span.Journal of Memory & Language,30, 685–701.
Hulme, C., Roodenrys, S., Schweickert, R., Brown, G. D. A., Martin, S., &Stuart, G. (1997). Word-frequency effects on shortterm memory tasks: Evidence for a redintegration process in immediate serial recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 1217–1232.
Kuçcera, H., &Francis, W. N. (1967).Computational analysis of presentday American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
Ladefoged, P. (1993).A course in phonetics (3rd ed.). Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Martin, R. C., &Romani, C. (1994). Verbal working memory and sentence comprehension: A multiple-components view.Neuropsychology,8, 506–523.
Martin, R. C., Shelton, J. R., &Yaffee, L. S. (1994). Language processing and working memory: Neuropsychological evidence for separate phonological and semantic capacities.Journal of Memory & Language,33, 83–111.
McEvoy, C. L., &Nelson, D. L. (1982). Category name and instance norms for 106 categories of various sizes.American Journal of Psychology,95, 581–634.
McGeoch, J. A. (1932). Forgetting and the law of disuse.Psychological Review,39, 352–370.
Nairne, J. S. (1990). A feature model of immediate memory.Memory & Cognition,18, 251–269.
Nairne, J. S. (2002a). The myth of the encoding-retrieval match.Memory,10, 389–395.
Nairne, J. S. (2002b). Remembering over the short-term: The case against the standard model.Annual Review of Psychology,53, 53–81.
Nairne, J. S., &Kelley, M. R. (1999). Reversing the phonological similarity effect.Memory & Cognition,27, 45–53.
Nairne, J. S., &Neumann, C. (1993). Enhancing effects of similarity on long-term memory for order.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 329–337.
Nelson, D. L., Bennett, D. J., Gee, N. R., Schreiber, T. A., &McKinney, V. M. (1993). Implicit memory: Effects of network size and interconnectivity on cued recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 747–764.
Nelson, D. L., McEvoy, C. L., & Schreiber, T. A. (1998).The University of South Florida word association, rhyme, and word fragment norms. Available at w3.usf.edu/FreeAssociation/Intro.html.
Nelson, D. L., McKinney, V. M., Gee, N. R., &Janczura, G. A. (1998). Interpreting the influence of implicitly activated memories on recall and recognition.Psychological Review,105, 299–324.
Nelson, D. L., Walling, J., &McEvoy, C. L. (1979). Doubts about depth.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,5, 24–44.
Poirier, M., &Saint-Aubin, J. (1995). Memory for related and unrelated words: Further evidence on the influence of semantic factors in immediate serial recall.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,48A, 384–404.
Roodenrys, S., Hulme, C., Lethbridge, A., Hinton, M., &Nimmo, L. M. (2002). Word-frequency and phonological-neighborhood effects on verbal short-term memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,28, 1019–1034.
Roodenrys, S., &Quinlan, P. T. (2000). The effects of stimulus set size and word frequency on verbal serial recall.Memory,8, 71–78.
Saint-Aubin, J., &Poirier, M. (1999). Semantic similarity and immediate serial recall: Is there a detrimental effect on order information?Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,52A, 367–394.
Schweickert, R. (1993). A multinomial processing tree model for degradation and redintegration in immediate recall.Memory & Cognition,21, 168–175.
Tehan, G., &Humphreys, M. S. (1995). Transient phonemic codes and immunity to proactive interference.Memory & Cognition,23, 181–191.
Tehan, G., &Humphreys, M. S. (1996). Cuing effects in short-term recall.Memory & Cognition, 24, 719–732.
Tehan, G., &Humphreys, M. S. (1998). Creating proactive interference in immediate recall: Building a dog from a dart, a mop, and a fig.Memory & Cognition,26, 477–489.
Walker, I., &Hulme, C. (1999). Concrete words are easier to recall than abstract words: Evidence for a semantic contribution to shortterm serial recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,25, 1256–1271.
Wickens, D. D. (1970). Encoding categories of words: An empirical approach to meaning.Psychological Review,77, 1–15.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work was supported, in part, by Research Support Scheme C-107-000-222-091 and Research Grant R-107-000-048-112, awarded to the first author.
Note—This article was accepted by the previous editorial team, when Colin M. MacLeod was Editor.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Goh, W.D., Tan, H. Proactive interference and cuing effects in short-term cued recall: Does foil context matter?. Memory & Cognition 34, 1063–1079 (2006). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193253
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193253