Abstract
Seven experiments examined recognition memory for sequentially presented odors. Following Reed (2000), participants were presented with a sequence of odors and then required to identify an odor from the sequence in a test probe comprising 2 odors. The pattern of results obtained by Reed (2000, although statistically marginal) demonstrated enhanced recognition for odors presented at the start (primacy) and end (recency) of the sequence: a result that we failed to replicate in any of the experiments reported here. Experiments 1 and 3 were designed to replicate Reed (2000), employing five-item and seven-item sequences, respectively, and each demonstrated significant recency, with evidence of primacy in Experiment 3 only. Experiment 2 replicated Experiment 1, with reduced interstimulus intervals, and produced a null effect of serial position. The ease with which the odors could be verbally labeled was manipulated in Experiments 4 and 5. Nameable odors produced a null effect of serial position (Experiment 4), and hard-to-name odors produced a pronounced recency effect (Experiment 5); nevertheless, overall rates of recognition were remarkably similar for the two experiments at around 70%. Articulatory suppression reduced recognition accuracy (Experiment 6), but recency was again present in the absence of primacy. Odor recognition performance was immune to the effects of an interleaved odor (Experiment 7), and, again, both primacy and recency effects were absent. There was no evidence of olfactory fatigue: Recognition accuracy improved across trials (Experiment 1). It is argued that the results of the experiments reported here are generally consistent with that body of work employing hard-to-name visual stimuli, where recency is obtained in the absence of primacy when the retention interval is short.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Annett, J. A., &Lorimer, A. W. (1995). Primacy and recency in recognition of odors and recall of odor names.Perceptual & Motor Skills,81, 787–794.
Avons, S. E., Ward, G., &Melling, L. (2004). Item and order memory for novel visual patterns assessed by two-choice recognition.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,57A, 865–891.
Bjork, R. A., &Whitten, W. B. (1974). Recency-sensitive retrieval processes.Cognitive Psychology,6, 173–189.
Engen, T. (1987). Remembering odors and their names.American Scientist,75, 497–503.
Gaffan, E. A. (1992). Primacy, recency, and the variability of data in studies of animals’ working memory.Animal Learning & Behavior,20, 240–252.
Gaffan, E. A. (1994). Primacy in animals’ working memory: Artifacts.Animal Learning & Behavior,22, 231–232.
Gaffan, E. A., &Gaffan, D. (1992). Less-than-expected variability in evidence for primacy and von Restorff effects in rats’ nonspatial memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,18, 298–301.
Gardiner, J. M., &Gregg, V. H. (1979). When auditory memory is not overwritten.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,18, 705–719.
Greene, R. L., Elliot, C. L., &Smith, M. D. (1988). When do interleaved suffixes improve recall?Journal of Memory & Language,27, 560–571.
Herz, R., &Engen, T. (1996). Odor memory: Review and analysis.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,3, 300–313.
Hitch, G. J. (1975). The role of attention in visual and auditory suffix effects.Memory & Cognition,3, 501–505.
Johnson, A., Miles, C., & Beacham, H. A. (2005).Item and order memory for odours assessed by two-choice recognition. Manuscript in preparation.
Jones, F. N., Roberts, K., &Holman, E. (1978). Similarity judgments and recognition memory for common spices.Perception & Psychophysics,24, 2–6.
Kaiser, L., &De Jong, R. (1993). Multi-odour memory influenced by learning order.Behavioural Processes,30, 175–184.
Kerr, J. R., Avons, S. E., &Ward, G. (1999). The effect of retention interval on serial position curves for item recognition of visual patterns and faces.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,25, 1475–1494.
Kerr, J. R., Ward, G., &Avons, S. E. (1998). Response bias in visual serial order memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24, 1316–1323.
Kesner, R. P., Chiba, A. A., &Jackson-Smith, P. (1994). Rats do show primacy and recency effects in memory for lists of spatial locations: A reply to Gaffan.Animal Learning & Behavior,22, 214–218.
Knoedler, A. J., Hellwig, K. A., &Neath, I. (1999). The shift from recency to primacy with increasing delay.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,25, 474–487.
Korsnes, M. S. (1995). Retention intervals and serial list memory.Perceptual & Motor Skills,80, 723–731.
Larsson, M., &Backman, L. (1997). Age-related differences in episodic odour recognition: The role of access to specific odour names.Memory,5, 361–378.
Lawless, H. T. (1978). Recognition of common odors, pictures, and simple shapes.Perception & Psychophysics,24, 493–495.
Mahrer, P., &Miles, C. (1999). Memorial and strategic determinants of tactile recency.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,25, 630–643.
Miles, C., &Borthwick, H. (1996). Tactile short-term memory revisited.Memory,4, 655–668.
Miles, C., &Jenkins, R. (2000). Recency and suffix effects with immediate recall of olfactory stimuli.Memory,8, 195–206.
Murdock, B. B., Jr. (1960). The distinctiveness of stimuli.Psychological Review,67, 16–31.
Neath, I. (1993). Distinctiveness and serial position effects in recognition.Memory & Cognition,21, 689–698.
Neath, I., &Knoedler, A. J. (1994). Distinctiveness and serial position effects in recognition and sentence processing.Journal of Memory & Language,33, 776–795.
Phillips, W. A., &Christie, D. F. M. (1977). Components of visual memory.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,29, 117–133.
Rawlins, J. N. P., Deacon, M. R. J., Tai, C. T., &Aggleton, J. P. (1992). Doubts concerning primacy in rats’ nonspatial recognition memory: Reply to Gaffan and Gaffan.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,18, 302–304.
Reed, P. (1992). Fewer doubts concerning rats’ serial position performance: Reply to Gaffan and Gaffan (1992) and Rawlins, Deacon, Chih-Ta, and Aggleton (1992).Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,18, 305–307.
Reed, P. (1994). Less than expected variance in studies of serial position effects is not a sufficient reason for caution.Animal Learning & Behavior,22, 224–230.
Reed, P. (2000). Serial position effects in recognition memory for odors.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,26, 411–422.
Reed, P., Chih-Ta, T., Aggleton, J. P., &Rawlins, J. N. P. (1991). Primacy, recency and the von Restorff effect in rats’ nonspatial recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,17, 36–44.
Surprenant, A. M., Pitt, M. A., &Crowder, R. G. (1993). Auditory recency in immediate memory.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,46A, 193–223.
Walk, H. A., &Johns, E. E. (1984). Interference and facilitation in short-term memory for odors.Perception & Psychophysics,36, 508–514.
Ward, G., Avons, S. E., &Melling, L. (2005). Serial position curves in short-term memory: Functional equivalence across modalities. Memory,13, 308–317.
White, T. L. (1992, March).A comparison of item and order processing in olfactory and verbal short-term memory. Paper presented at the fourth annual AchemS conference, Sarasota, FL.
White, T. L. (1998). Olfactory memory: The long and the short of it.Chemical Senses,23, 433–441.
White, T. L., &Treisman, M. (1997). A comparison of the encoding of content and order in olfactory memory and in memory for visually presented verbal materials.British Journal of Psychology,88, 459–472.
Wright, A. A. (1994). Primacy effects in animal memory and human nonverbal memory.Animal Learning & Behavior,22, 219–223.
Wright, A. A., Santiago, H. C., Sands, S. F., Kendrick, D. F., &Cook, R. G. (1985). Memory processing of serial lists by pigeons, monkeys, and people.Science,229, 287–289.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The authors thank Bryony Berry, Paul Allen, and Anna Biles for their help with data collection, Andrew Johnson for statistical advice, Rob Honey and Simon Killcross for their useful discussions concerning this work, and Geoff Ward and two anonymous referees for their helpful comments on an earlier version of this paper.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Miles, C., Hodder, K. Serial position effects in recognition memory for odors: A reexamination. Memory & Cognition 33, 1303–1314 (2005). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193230
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193230