Memory & Cognition

, Volume 33, Issue 7, pp 1248–1255 | Cite as

On the speed of intuition: Intuitive judgments of semantic coherence under different response deadlines

  • Annette BolteEmail author
  • Thomas Goschke


Intuition is the ability to judge stimulus properties on the basis of information that is activated in memory but not consciously retrieved. We investigated one central feature of intuitive judgments— namely, their speed. Participants judged whether or not three clue words were coherent in the sense that they were weakly associated with a common fourth concept. To restrict the time available for conscious deliberation of possible solution words, participants had to synchronize their judgments with a response signal appearing at different lags after the clue words. In two experiments, participants discriminated coherent and incoherent triads reliably better than chance, even when they did not consciously retrieve the solution word and the lag between clue words and response signal was as short as 1.5 sec. Results indicate that intuitive judgments can indeed be made very fast and without extended conscious deliberation. Possible mechanisms underlying intuitive judgments are discussed.


Response Signal False Alarm Rate Chance Level Solution Concept Intuitive Judgment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Abdullaev, Y. G., &Posner, M. I. (1997). Time course of activating brain areas in generating verbal associations.Psychological Science,8, 56–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bastick, T. (1982).Intuition: How we think and act. Chichester, U.K.: Wiley.Google Scholar
  3. Beeman, M., Friedman, R. B., Grafman, J., Perez, E., Diamond, S., &Beadle Lindsay, M. (1994). Summation priming and coarse semantic coding in the right hemisphere.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,6, 26–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bolte, A., Goschke, T., &Kuhl, J. (2003). Emotion and intuition: Effects of positive and negative mood on implicit judgments of semantic coherence.Psychological Science,14, 416–421.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bowden, E. M., &Beeman, M. J. (1998). Getting the right idea: Semantic activation in the right hemisphere may help solve insight problems.Psychological Science,9, 435–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bowers, K. S., Regehr, G., Balthazard, C., &Parker, K. (1990). Intuition in the context of discovery.Cognitive Psychology,22, 72–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chiarello, C., &Richards, L. (1992). Another look at categorical priming in the cerebral hemispheres.Neuropsychologia,30, 381–392.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Collins, A. M., &Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing.Psychological Review,82, 407–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dorfman, J., Shames, V. A., &Kihlstrom, J. F. (1996). Intuition, incubation, and insight: Implicit cognition in problem solving. In G. Underwood (Ed.),Implicit cognition (pp.257–2966). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Epstein, S. (1994). Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious.American Psychologist,49, 709–724.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Galton, F. (1879). Psychometric experiments.Brain,2, 149–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Goschke, T. (1997). Implicit learning and unconscious knowledge: Mental representation, computational mechanisms, and brain structures. In K. Lamberts & D. Shanks (Eds.),Knowledge, concepts and categories (pp. 247–333). Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  13. Greenwald, A. G. (1992). New look 3: Unconscious cognition reclaimed.American Psychologist,47, 766–779.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hintzman, D. L. (1988). Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace memory model.Psychological Review,95, 528–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ilg, R., Vogeley, K., Bolte, A., Goschke, T., Shah, N. J., & Fink, G. R. (2003, June).Neural correlates of intuition: An event-related fMRI study of implicit perception of semantic coherence. Poster presented at the 9th International Conference on Functional Mapping of the Human Brain, New York.Google Scholar
  16. Jung, C. G., &Riklin, F. (1904). Diagnostische Assoziationsstudien.Zeitschrift für Psychologie und Neurologie,3, 193–215.Google Scholar
  17. Jung-Beeman, M., Bowden, E. M., Haberman, J., Frymiare, J. L., Arambel-Liu, S., Greenblatt, R., et al. (2004). Neural activity when people solve verbal problems with insight.Public Library of Science Biology,2, e97.Google Scholar
  18. Kahneman, D. (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality.American Psychologist,58, 697–720.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kiefer, M., Weisbrod, M., Kern, I., Maier, S., &Spitzer, M. (1998). Right hemisphere activation during indirect semantic priming: Evidence from event-related potentials.Brain & Language,64, 377–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kihlstrom, J. F. (1987). The cognitive unconscious.Science,237, 1445–1452.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kuhl, J. (2000). A functional-design approach to motivation and selfregulation: The dynamics of personality systems and interactions. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.),Handbook of selfregulation (pp. 111–169). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  22. Lieberman, M. D. (2000). Intuition: A social cognitive neuroscience approach.Psychological Bulletin,126, 109–137.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mednick, S. A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process.Psychological Review,69, 220–232.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mednick, S. A., &Mednick, M. T. (1967).Remote associates test: Examiner’s manual. College and adult forms 1 and 2. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  25. Perrig, W. J., &Wippich, W. (1995). Intuition in the context of perception, memory and judgement. In B. Boothe, R. Hirsig, A. Helminger, B. Meier, & R. Volkart (Eds.),Swiss monographs in psychology: Vol. 3. Perception-evaluation-interpretation (pp. 21–31). Göttingen: Hogrefe & Huber.Google Scholar
  26. Pollack, I. (1970). A nonparametric procedure for evaluation of true and false positives.Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation,2, 155–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Reber, A. S. (1993).Implicit learning and tacit knowledge: An essay on the cognitive unconscious. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Reed, A. V. (1973). Speed-accuracy trade-off in recognition memory.Science,181, 574–576.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schacter, D. L. (1987). Implicit memory: History and current status.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,13, 501–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Seger, C. A. (1994). Implicit learning.Psychological Bulletin,115, 163–196.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Seger, C. A., Desmond, J. E., Glover, G. H., &Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2000). Functional magnetic resonance imaging evidence for righthemisphere involvement in processing unusual semantic relationships.Neuropsychology,14, 361–369.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Shames, V. A. (1994).Is there such a thing as implicit problem-solving? Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Arizona, Tucson.Google Scholar
  33. Spitzer, M., Braun, U., Maier, S., Hermle, L., &Maher, B. A. (1993). Indirect semantic priming in schizophrenic patients.Schizophrenia Research,11, 71–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Stadler, M. A., &Frensch, P. A. (1998).Handbook of implicit learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  35. Strack, F., &Deutsch, R. (2004). Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior.Personality & Social Psychology Review,8, 220–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Westcott, M. R. (1968).Toward a contemporary psychology of intuition. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  37. Wickelgren, W. A. (1977). Speed-accuracy tradeoff and information processing dynamics.Acta Psychologica,41, 67–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Yaniv, I., &Meyer, D. E. (1987). Activation and metacognition of inaccessible stored information: Potential bases for incubation effects in problem solving.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,2, 187–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for PsychologyBraunschweig University of TechnologyBraunschweigGermany
  2. 2.Dresden University of TechnologyDresdenGermany

Personalised recommendations