Abstract
Previous studies on human causal learning (De Houwer & Beckers, 2003; De Houwer, Beckers, & Glautier, 2002) showed that secondary task difficulty (performing an easy vs. a difficult secondary task during the main causal learning task) and ceiling information (outcome occurs with a maximal vs. submaximal intensity) had an influence on forward blocking (i.e., lower causal ratings for cue T when AT+ trials are preceded by A+ trials than when no A+ trials are presented). We extended these studies by also examining self-reports of participants about the reasons behind their causal ratings. Blocking was found only for participants who reported an appropriate blocking inference. Furthermore, secondary task difficulty and ceiling information influenced the number of participants who reported an appropriate blocking inference. These findings point to a major impact of inferential reasoning in human causal learning.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Aitken, M. R. F., Larkin, M. J. W., &Dickinson, A. (2001). Reexamination of the role of within-compound associations in the retrospective revaluation of causal judgements.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,54B, 27–51.
Brown, N. R. (1995). Estimation strategies and the judgment of event frequency.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 1539–1553.
Chapman, G. B. (1991). Trial order affects cue interaction in contingency judgment.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17, 837–854.
Chapman, G. B., &Robbins, S. J. (1990). Cue interaction in human contingency judgment.Memory & Cognition,18, 537–545.
Cheng, P. W. (1997). From covariation to causation: A causal power theory.Psychological Review,104, 367–405.
Cheng, P. W., &Holyoak, K. J. (1995). Complex adaptive systems as intuitive statisticians: Causality, contingency, and prediction. In H. L. Roitblat & J.-A. Meyer (Eds.),Comparative approaches to cognitive science (pp. 271–302). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cheng, P. W., &Novick, L. R. (1990). A probabilistic contrast model of causal induction.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,58, 545–567.
De Houwer, J. (2002). Forward blocking depends on retrospective inferences about the presence of the blocked cue during the elemental phase.Memory & Cognition,30, 24–33.
De Houwer, J., &Beckers, T. (2002). A review of recent developments in research and theories on human contingency learning.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,55B, 289–310.
De Houwer, J., &Beckers, T. (2003). Secondary task difficulty modulates forward blocking in human contingency learning.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,56B, 345–357.
De Houwer, J., Beckers, T., &Glautier, S. (2002). Outcome and cue properties modulate blocking.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,55A, 965–985.
De Houwer, J., Beckers, T., &Vandorpe, S. (2005). Evidence for the role of higher order reasoning processes in cue competition and other learning phenomena.Learning & Behavior,33, 239–249.
De Houwer, J., Vandorpe, S., &Beckers, T. (2004). On the role of controlled cognitive processes in human associative learning. In A. Wills (Ed.),New directions in human associative learning (pp. 41–63). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Denniston, J. C., Savastano, H. I., &Miller, R. R. (2001). The extended comparator hypothesis: Learning by contiguity, responding by relative strength. In R. R. Mowrer & S. B. Klein (Eds.),Handbook of contemporary learning theories (pp. 65–117). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Dickinson, A., &Burke, J. (1996). Within-compound associations mediate the retrospective revaluation of causality judgements.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,49B, 60–80.
Dickinson, A., Shanks, D., &Evenden, J. (1984). Judgement of act-outcome contingency: The role of selective attribution.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,36A, 29–50.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983).Mental models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lovibond, P. F. (2003). Causal beliefs and conditioned responses: Retrospective revaluation induced by experience and by instruction.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,29, 97–106.
Nisbett, R. E., &Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.Psychological Review,84, 231–259.
Rescorla, R. A., &Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.),Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory (pp.64–999). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Rips, L. J. (1983). Cognitive processes in propositional reasoning.Psychological Review,90, 38–71.
Shanks, D. R. (1985). Forward and backward blocking in human contingency judgement.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,37B, 1–21.
Shanks, D. R., &Lopez, F. J. (1996). Causal order does not affect cue selection in human associative learning.Memory & Cognition,24, 511–522.
Sloman, S. A. (1996). The empirical case for two systems of reasoning.Psychological Bulletin,119, 3–22.
Smith, E. R., &Miller, F. D. (1978). Limits on perception of cognitive processes: A reply to Nisbett and Wilson.Psychological Review,85, 355–362.
Vandorpe, S., & De Houwer, J. (in press-a). A comparison of forward blocking and reduced overshadowing in human causal learning.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.
Vandorpe, S., & De Houwer, J. (in press-b). People want to see information that will help them make valid inferences in human contingency learning.Memory & Cognition.
Waldmann, M. R. (2000). Competition among causes but not effects in predictive and diagnostic learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,26, 53–76.
Waldmann, M. R., &Holyoak, K. J. (1992). Predictive and diagnostic learning within causal models: Asymmetries in cue competition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,121, 222–236.
Waldmann, M. R., &Walker, J. M. (2005). Competence and performance in human causal learning.Learning & Behavior,33, 211–229.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vandorpe, S., De Houwer, J. & Beckers, T. Further evidence for the role of inferential reasoning in forward blocking. Memory & Cognition 33, 1047–1056 (2005). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193212
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193212