Abstract
Study of the phonological similarity effect (PSE) in immediate serial recall (ISR) has produced a conflicting body of results. Five experiments tested various theoretical ideas that together may help integrate these results. Experiments 1 and 2 tested alternative accounts that explain the effect of phonological similarity on item recall in terms of feature overlap, linguistic structure, or serial order. In each experiment, the participants’ ISR was assessed for rhyming, alliterative, and similar nonrhyming/ nonalliterative lists. The results were consistent with the predictions of the serial order account, with item recall being higher for rhyming than for alliterative lists and higher for alliterative than for similar nonrhyming/nonalliterative lists. Experiments 3 and 4 showed that these item recall differences are reduced when list items repeat across lists. Experiment 5 employed rhyming and dissimilar onesyllable and two-syllable lists to demonstrate that recall for similar (rhyming) lists can be better than that for dissimilar lists even in a typical ISR task in which words are used, providing a direct reversal of the classic PSE. These and other previously published results are interpreted and integrated within a proposed theoretical framework that offers an account of the PSE.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
The American Heritage dictionary of the English language (3rd ed.). (1996). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Baddeley, A. D. (1966). Short-term memory for word sequences as a function of acoustic, semantic, and formal similarity.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,18, 362–365.
Baddeley, A. D. (1986).Working memory. New York: Oxford University Press.
Baddeley, A. [D.] (1992). Is working memory working? The fifteenth Bartlett Lecture.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,44A, 1–31.
Baddeley, A. D., Gathercole, S. E., &Papagno, C. (1998). The phonological loop as a language learning device.Psychological Review,105, 158–173.
Baddeley, A. D., &Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory.Psychology of Learning & Motivation,8, 47–89.
Baddeley, A. D., &Hitch, G. (1994). Developments in the concept of working memory.NeuroPsychology,8, 485–493.
Baddeley, A. D., Lewis, V., &Vallar, G. (1984). Exploring the articulatory loop.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,36A, 233–252.
Bogus, R. (1991).The complete rhyming dictionary revised including the poet’s craft book (rev. ed.). New York: Doubleday.
Cohen, J., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., &Provost, J. (1993). Psy-Scope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,25, 257–271.
Coltheart, V. (1993). Effects of phonological similarity and concurrent irrelevant articulation on short-term memory recall of repeated and novel word lists.Memory & Cognition,21, 539–545.
Conrad, R. (1964). Acoustic confusion and immediate memory.British Journal of Psychology,55, 75–84.
Drewnowski, A. (1980). Attributes and priorities in short-term recall: A new model of memory span.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,109, 208–250.
Fallon, A. B. (1999).Phonemic similarity, trace strength, and trace degradation in the immediate serial recall task. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Australia.
Fallon, A. B., Groves, K., &Tehan, G. (1999). Phonological similarity and trace degradation in the serial recall task: When CAT helps RAT, but not MAN.International Journal of Psychology,34, 301–307.
Fallon, A. B., Mak, E., Tehan, G., &Daly, C. (2005). Lexicality and phonological similarity: A challenge for the retrieval-based account of serial recall?Memory,13, 349–356.
Fallon, A. B., & Tehan, G. (1995, September).The cat among the pigeons: The discovery of a reverse phonemic similarity effect in shortterm serial recall. Paper presented at the 30th Annual Australian Psychological Society Conference, Perth.
Gathercole, S. E., Gardiner, J. M., &Gregg, V. H. (1982). Modality and phonological similarity effects in serial recall: Does one’s own voice play a role?Memory & Cognition,10, 176–180.
Gupta, P. (1996). Word learning and verbal short-term memory: A computational account. In G. W. Cottrell (Ed.),Proceedings of the Eighteenth Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 189–194). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Gupta, P., &Dell, G. S. (1999). The emergence of language from serial order and procedural memory. In B. MacWhinney (Ed.),The emergence of language (pp. 447–481). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Gupta, P., &MacWhinney, B. (1997). Vocabulary acquisition and verbal short-term memory: Computational and neural bases.Brain & Language,59, 267–333.
Kučera, H., &Francis, W. (1967).Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
Lambert, B. L., Chang, K.-Y., &Lin, S.-J. (2003). Immediate free recall of drug names: Effects of similarity and availability.American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy,60, 156–168.
Lian, A., &Karlsen, P. J. (2004). Advantages and disadvantages of phonological similarity in serial recall and serial recognition of nonwords.Memory & Cognition,32, 223–234.
Lian, A., Karlsen, P. J., &Eriksen, T. B. (2004). Opposing effects of phonological similarity on item and order memory of words and nonwords in the serial recall task.Memory,12, 314–337.
Merriam-Webster’s online dictionary (2001). Available at www .m-w.com.
Merriam-Webster’s rhyming dictionary (1995). Springfield, MA: Merriam-Webster.
Mitchell, K. M. (Ed.) (1996).Essential songwriter’s rhyming dictionary. Los Angeles: Alfred.
Nairne, J. S. (1990). A feature model of immediate memory.Memory & Cognition,18, 251–269.
Nairne, J. S., &Kelley, M. R. (1999). Reversing the phonological similarity effect.Memory & Cognition,27, 45–53.
Nairne, J. S., &Neumann, C. (1993). Enhancing effects of similarity on long-term memory for order.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 329–337.
Nimmo, L. M., &Roodenrys, S. (2004). Investigating the phonological similarity effect: Syllable structure and the position of common phonemes.Journal of Memory & Language,50, 245–258.
Poirier, M., &Saint-Aubin, J. (1996). Immediate serial recall, word frequency, item identity, and item position.Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology,50, 408–412.
Service, E., &Maury, S. (2003). All parts of an item are not equal: Effects of phonological redundancy on immediate recall.Memory & Cognition,31, 273–284.
Sevald, C. A., &Dell, G. S. (1994). The sequential cuing effect in speech production.Cognition,53, 91–127.
SoundEdit 16 users guide, Version 1.0 [Computer software] (1997). San Francisco: Macromedia.
Watkins, M. J., Watkins, O. C., &Crowder, R. G. (1974). The modality effect in free and serial recall as a function of phonological similarity.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,7, 319–348.
Webster’s compact rhyming dictionary (1987). Springfield, MA: Merriam-Webster.
Wickelgren, W. A. (1965). Short-term memory for phonemically similar lists.American Journal of Psychology,78, 567–574.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported in part by a University of Iowa CIFRE grant and by Grant NIH R01 DC006499 to the first author.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gupta, P., Lipinski, J. & Aktunc, E. Reexamining the phonological similarity effect in immediate serial recall: The roles of type of similarity, category cuing, and item recall. Memory & Cognition 33, 1001–1016 (2005). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193208
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193208