Skip to main content
Download PDF

Using a computer simulation of three slot machines to investigate a gambler’s preference among varying densities of near-miss alternatives

Behavior Research Methods volume 39, pages 237–241 (2007)Cite this article

Abstract

The present article describes a software program in Visual Basic .NET designed to simulate three slot machines on a computer screen. This software is described in detail regarding utility, downloading, and usage; and data are presented illustrating the software’s potential for researchers interested in gambling behavior. A simulation of multiple slot machines such as this enables researchers to evaluate players’ preferences across various machines. In the highlighted experiment, 18 recreational slot machine players played the software for extra course credit and a chance at cash prizes. All participants played a version of the simulation in which every 5th response on average was a win, whereas the remaining trials were a loss. However, on those loss trials, a varying distribution of almost wins or near misses (i.e., two winning symbols on the payoff line and the final winning symbol directly above or below the payoff line) were presented in percentages of 15, 30, or 45. While no preferences across the three options could be predicted on the basis of reinforcement history alone, deviations from equal choices across the games were noted and appeared to be the result of the presentations of near-miss losing trials. Implications for a greater understanding of pathological gambling are presented.

References

  • Dixon, M. R., &Delaney, J. (2006). The impact of verbal behavior on gambling behavior. In P. M. Ghezzi, C. A. Lyons, M. R. Dixon, & G. R. Wilson (Eds.),Gambling: Behavior theory, research, and application (pp. 171–189). Reno, NV: Context Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, M. R., MacLin, O. H., &Daugherty, D. (2006). Response allocations to concurrently available slot machine simulations.Behavior Research Methods,38, 232–236.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, M. R., &Moore, K. (2006). Native American gambling: The quest for the new white buffalo. In P. M. Ghezzi, C. A. Lyons, M. R. Dixon, & G. R. Wilson (Eds.),Gambling: Behavior theory, research, and application (pp. 231–247). Reno, NV: Context Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, M. R., &Schreiber, J. E. (2004). Near-miss effects on response latencies and win estimations of slot machine players.Psychological Record,54, 335–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghezzi, P. M., Lyons, C. A., &Dixon, M. R. (2000). Gambling in socioeconomic perspective. In W. K. Bickel & R. E. Vuchinich (Eds.),Reframing health behavior change with behavioral economics (pp. 313–338). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesieur, H. R., &Blume, S. B. (1987). The South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS): A new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers.American Journal of Psychiatry,144, 1184–1188.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MacLin, O. H., Dixon, M. R., &Hayes, L. J. (1999). A computerized slot machine simulation to investigate the variables involved in gambling behavior.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,31, 731–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacLin, O. H., Dixon, M. R., Robinson, A., &Daugherty, D. (2006). Writing a simple slot machine simulation program. In P. M. Ghezzi, C. A. Lyons, M. R. Dixon, & G. R. Wilson (Eds.),Gambling: Behavior theory, research, and application (pp. 127–154). Reno, NV: Context Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, H. J., Hall, M. N., &Vander Bilt, J. (1999). Estimating the prevalence of disordered gambling behavior in the United States and Canada: A research synthesis.American Journal of Public Health,89, 1369–1376.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, R. M., &Brown, R. I. F. (1988). An outcome study of Gamblers Anonymous.British Journal of Psychiatry,152, 284–288.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. University of Northern Iowa, Cedar Falls, Iowa

    Otto H. MacLin & Dustin Daugherty

  2. Behavior Analysis and Therapy Program, Rehabilitation Institute, Southern Illinois University, 62901, Carbondale, IL

    Mark R. Dixon & Stacey L. Small

Authors
  1. Otto H. MacLin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mark R. Dixon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Dustin Daugherty
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Stacey L. Small
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark R. Dixon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

MacLin, O.H., Dixon, M.R., Daugherty, D. et al. Using a computer simulation of three slot machines to investigate a gambler’s preference among varying densities of near-miss alternatives. Behavior Research Methods 39, 237–241 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193153

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193153

Keywords

  • Pathological Gambling
  • Gambling Behavior
  • Extinction Condition
  • Slot Machine
  • Visual Basic