Advertisement

Behavior Research Methods

, Volume 39, Issue 2, pp 167–174 | Cite as

CAPAS 2.0: A computer tool for coding transcribed and digitally recorded verbal reports

  • Robert J CrutcherEmail author
Articles From the SCiP Conference

Abstract

A new computer software tool for coding and analyzing verbal report data is described. Combining and extending the capabilities of earlier verbal report coding software tools, CAPAS 2.0 enables researchers to code two different types of verbal report data: (1) verbal reports already transcribed and stored in text files and (2) verbal reports in their original digitally recorded audio format. For both types of data, individual verbal report segments are presented in random order and coded independently of other segments in accordance with a localized encoding principle. Once all reports are coded, CAPAS 2.0 converts the coded reports to a formatted file suitable for analysis by statistical packages such as SPSS. R. J. Crutcher, crutcher@udayton.edu

Keywords

Audio Recording Verbal Report Computer Tool Audio File Verbal Protocol 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Ames, S. L., Gallaher, P. E., Sun, P., Pearce, S., Zogg, J. B., Houska, B. R., et al. (2005). A Web-based program for coding open-ended response protocols.Behavior Research Methods,37, 470–479.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, J. R. (1987). Methodologies for studying human knowledge.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,10, 467–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Austin, J., &Mawhinney, T. C. (1999). Using concurrent verbal reports to examine data analyst verbal behavior.Journal of Organizational Behavior Management,18, 61–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bainbridge, L., &Sanderson, P. (1995). Verbal protocol analysis. In J. R. Wilson & E. N. Corlett (Eds.),Evaluation of human work: A practical ergonomics methodology. Bristol, PA: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  5. Bhaskar, R., &Simon, H. A. (1977). Problem solving in semantically rich domains: An example from engineering thermodynamics.Cognitive Science,1, 193–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chi, M. T. H. (1997). Quantifying qualitative analyses of verbal data: A practical guide.Journal of the Learning Sciences,6, 271–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chi, M. T. H. (2006). Laboratory methods for assessing experts’ and novices’ knowledge. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J. Feltovich, & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.),The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 167–184). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Crutcher, R. J. (1994). Telling what we know: The use of verbal report methodologies in psychological research.Psychological Science,5, 241–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Crutcher, R. J. (1998). The role of prior knowledge in mediating foreign vocabulary acquisition and retention: A process-analytic approach. In A. F. Healy & L. E. Bourne, Jr. (Eds.),Foreign language learning: Psycholinguistic studies on training and retention (pp. 91–111). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  10. Crutcher, R. J. (2003). A computer-aided digital audio recording and encoding system for improving the encoding of verbal reports.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,35, 263–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Crutcher, R. J., &Ericsson, K. A. (2000). The role of mediators in memory retrieval as a function of practice: Controlled mediation to direct access.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,26, 1297–1317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Crutcher, R. J., Ericsson, K. A., &Wichura, C. A. (1994). Improving the encoding of verbal reports by using MPAS: A computer-aided encoding system.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,26, 167–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ericsson, K. A. (2002). Towards a procedure for eliciting verbal expression of non-verbal experience without reactivity: Interpreting the verbal overshadowing effect within the theoretical framework for protocol analysis.Applied Cognitive Psychology,16, 981–987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ericsson, K. A. (2006). Protocol analysis and expert thought: Concurrent verbalizations of thinking during experts’ performance on representative tasks. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J. Feltovich, & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.),The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 223–241). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Ericsson, K. A., Charness, N., Feltovich, P. J., &Hoffman, R. R. (Eds.). (2006).The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Ericsson, K. A., &Crutcher, R. J. (1991). Introspection and verbal reports on cognitive processes: Two approaches to the study of thinking.New Ideas in Psychology,9, 57–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ericsson, K. A., &Simon, H. A. (1993).Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data (Rev. ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  18. Fisher, C. (1987). Advancing the study of programming with computeraided protocol analysis. In G. M. Olson, S. Sheppard, & E. Soloway (Eds.),Empirical studies of programmers: Second workshop (pp. 198–216). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
  19. James, J. M., &Sanderson, P. M. (1991). Heuristic and statistical support for protocol analysis with SHAPA Version 2.01.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,23, 449–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. MacLin, O. H., &MacLin, M. K. (2005). Coding observational data: A software solution.Behavior Research Methods,37, 224–231.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Nisbett, R. E., &Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.Psychological Review,84, 231–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Noldus, L. P. J. J., Trienes, R. J. H., Hendriksen, A. H. M., Jansen, H., &Jansen, R. G. (2000). The Observer Video-Pro: New software for the collection, management, and presentation of time-structured data from videotapes and digital media files.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,32, 197–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sanderson, P. M., James, J. M., &Seidler, K. S. (1989). SHAPA: An interactive software environment for protocol analysis.Ergonomics,32, 1271–1302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Schraagen, J. M. (2006). Task analysis. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J. Feltovich, & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.),The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 185–201). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Siegler, R. S. (1987). The perils of averaging data over strategies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,116, 250–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Siegler, R. S. (1988). Strategy choice procedures and the development of multiplication skill.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,117, 258–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Simon, H. A., &Kaplan, C. A. (1989). Foundations of cognitive science. In M. I. Posner (Ed.),Foundations of cognitive science (pp. 1–47). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  28. Smith, E. R., &Miller, F. D. (1978). Limits on perception of cognitive processes: A reply to Nisbett and Wilson.Psychological Review,85, 355–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Trabasso, T., &Suh, S. (1993). Understanding text: Achieving explanatory coherence through on-line inferences and mental operations in working memory.Discourse Processes,16, 3–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Waterman, D. A., &Newell, A. (1971). Protocol analysis as a task for artificial intelligence.Artificial Intelligence,2, 285–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Waterman, D. A., &Newell, A. (1973). PAS-II: An interactive taskfree version of an automatic protocol analysis system. InProceedings of the Third International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 431–445). Menlo Park, CA: Stanford Research Institute.Google Scholar
  32. White, D. J., King, A. P., &Duncan, S. D. (2002). Voice recognition technology as a tool for behavioral research.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,34, 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. White, P. (1980). Limitations on verbal reports of internal events: A refutation of Nisbett and Wilson and of Bem.Psychological Review,87, 105–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of DaytonDayton

Personalised recommendations