Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

, Volume 14, Issue 6, pp 1090–1095 | Cite as

“You and your best friend Suzy put Slime in Ms. Smollett’s desk”: Producing false memories with self-relevant details

  • Tracy Desjardins
  • Alan ScoboriaEmail author
Brief Reports


Rates of false memory reports vary markedly in the published literature. In an effort to explain these differences, the present study investigated the effects of including different types of details in a false narrative upon subsequent false memory formation. Participants were assigned to one of four conditions in which the inclusion of self-relevant and/or specific details in a false event (putting a toy in a teacher’s desk) was manipulated. Participants engaged in a standard memory recovery procedure over three interviews, involving recall for three true and one false event. Upon completion, 68.2% of participants in self-relevant groups were judged as having created memories or images about the false event, as compared with 36.4% in non-self-relevant groups. Subjective ratings of memory intensity were higher for self-relevant groups, and self-relevant participants were less likely to correctly guess the false event. These findings indicate that including self-relevant details in suggested childhood events increases the likelihood that such events will be accepted as false memories.


False Memory Autobiographical Memory Relevant Detail Apply Cognitive Psychology False Event 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Bernstein, D. M., Whittlesea, B. W. A., &Loftus, E. F. (2002). Increasing confidence in remote autobiographical memory and general knowledge: Extensions of the revelation effect.Memory & Cognition,30, 432–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Garry, M., &Wade, K. (2005). Actually, a picture is worth less than 45 words: Narratives produce more false memories than photographs do.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,12, 359–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Hyman, I. E., Husband, T. H., &Billings, F. J. (1995). False memories of childhood experiences.Applied Cognitive Psychology,9, 181–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hyman, I. E., &Pentland, J. (1996). The role of mental imagery in the creation of false childhood memories.Journal of Memory & Language,35, 101–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Jacoby, L. L., Kelley, C. M., &Dywan, J. (1989). Memory attributions. In H. L. Roediger III & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.),Varieties of memory and consciousness: Essays in honour of Endel Tulving (pp. 391–422). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  6. Lindsay, D. S., Hagen, L., Read, J. D., Wade, K. A., &Garry, M. (2004). True photographs and false memories.Psychological Science,15, 149–154.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Loftus, E. F. (2003). Make-believe memories.American Psychologist,58, 867–873.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Markus, H. (1977). Self-schemata and processing information about the self.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,35, 63–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Pezdek, K., Finger, K., &Hodge, D. (1997). Planting false childhood memories: The role of event plausibility.Psychological Science,8, 437–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Rogers, T. B., Kuiper, N. A., &Kirker W. S. (1977). Self-reference and the encoding of personal information.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,35, 677–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Schacter, D. L., &Addis, D. R. (2007). Constructive memory: The ghosts of past and future.Nature,445, 27.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Schooler, J. (1999). Discovered memories and the “delayed discovery” doctrine: A cognitive case-based analysis. In S. Taub (Ed.),Recovered memories of child sexual abuse: Psychological, social, and legal perspectives on a contemporary mental health controversy (pp. 121–141). Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
  13. Scoboria, A., Mazzoni, G., Kirsch, I., &Jimenez, S. (2006). The effects of prevalence and script information on plausibility, belief, and memory of autobiographical events.Applied Cognitive Psychology,20, 1049–1064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Scoboria, A., Mazzoni, G., Kirsch, I., &Relyea, M. (2004). Plausibility and belief in autobiographical memory.Applied Cognitive Psychology,18, 791–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Symons, C. S., &Johnson, B. T. (1997). The self-reference effect in memory: A meta-analysis.Psychological Bulletin,121, 371–394.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Wade, K. A., Garry, M., Read, J. D., &Lindsay, D. S. (2002). A picture is worth a thousand lies: Using false photographs to create false childhood memories.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,9, 597–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of WindsorWindsorCanada

Personalised recommendations