Abstract
Visual short-term memory (VSTM) is traditionally considered a robust form of visual memory resistant to interference from subsequent visual input. This study shows that the robustness of VSTM depends on the way attention is allocated in VSTM. When attention is distributed across multiple memory items, VSTM for these items is vulnerable to interference from subsequent input, including passively viewed images and the postchange testing displays. Yet attention can readjust its focus in VSTM on the basis of an attentional orienting cue presented long after encoding. When attention is oriented to a particular memorized item, the memory is resistant to subsequent interference. This effect, however, is eliminated when the subset of items demanding focal attention exceeds one, suggesting that orienting attention in VSTM is less flexible than orienting attention in perception. We propose that the robustness of VSTM is influenced by whether attention is focused or distributed in VSTM.
Article PDF
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Awh, E., &Pashler, H. (2000). Evidence for split attentional foci.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,26, 834–846.
Broadbent, D. E., &Broadbent, M. H. P. (1981). Recency effects in visual memory.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,33A, 1–15.
Carrier, L. M., &Pashler, H. (1995). Attentional limits in memory retrieval.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 1339–1348.
Griffin, I. C., &Nobre, A. C. (2003). Orienting attention to locations in internal representations.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,15, 1176–1194.
Kramer, A. F., &Hahn, S. (1995). Splitting the beam: Distribution of attention over non-contiguous regions of the visual field.Psychological Science,6, 381–386.
Landman, R., Spekreijse, H., &Lamme, V. (2003). Large capacity storage of integrated objects before change blindness.Vision Research,43, 149–164.
Lepsien, J., Griffin, I. C., Delvin, J. T., &Nobre, A. C. (2005). Directing spatial attention in mental representations: Interactions between attentional orienting and working memory load.NeuroImage,26, 733–743.
Luck, S. J., &Vogel, E. K. (1997). The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions.Nature,390, 279–281.
Makovski, T., Shim, W. M., &Jiang, Y. V. (2006). Interference from filled delays on visual change detection.Journal of Vision,6, 1469–1470.
Phillips, W. A. (1974). On the distinction between sensory storage and short-term visual memory.Perception & Psychophysics,16, 283–290.
Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention: The 7th Sir Frederic Bartlett Lecture.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,32, 3–25.
Schmidt, B. K., Vogel, E. K., Woodman, G. F., &Luck, S. J. (2002). Voluntary and automatic attentional control of visual working memory.Perception & Psychophysics,64, 754–763.
Sligte, I. G., Lamme, V. A. F., &Scholte, H. S. (2006). Iconic memory revisited: A plea for a distinction between a retinal and cortical icon [Abstract].Journal of Vision,6, 989.
Vogel, E. K. (2000). Selective storage in visual working memory: Distinguishing between perceptual-level and working memory-level mechanisms of attention. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa.
Vogel, E. K., Woodman, G. F., &Luck, S. J. (2005). Pushing around the locus of selection: Evidence for the flexible-selection hypothesis.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,17, 1907–1922.
Vogel, E. K., Woodman, G. F., &Luck, S. J. (2006). The time course of consolidation in visual working memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,32, 1436–1451.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This study was supported by Grants NSF 0345525, ARO 46929-LS, and NIH MH071788.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Makovski, T., Jiang, Y.V. Distributing versus focusing attention in visual short-term memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 14, 1072–1078 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193093
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193093